From: Casey Bowman <casey.g.bowman@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Casey Bowman <casey.g.bowman@intel.com>, dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_psr: Changed psr_set logic to account for older kernels
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:26:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181017212658.113049-1-casey.g.bowman@intel.com> (raw)
Only EINVAL was being used to account for older kernels,
but on legacy kernels that don't use i915_edp_psr_debug,
the ENOENT error will be thrown. This changes the logic
to set PSR via the module parameter if a problem occurs
when attempting to set PSR via the debugfs_fd.
Signed-off-by: Casey Bowman <casey.g.bowman@intel.com>
---
lib/igt_psr.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/igt_psr.c b/lib/igt_psr.c
index 0ddfb64f..6904393c 100644
--- a/lib/igt_psr.c
+++ b/lib/igt_psr.c
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ static int has_psr_debugfs(int debugfs_fd)
* Check if new PSR debugfs api is usable by writing an invalid value.
* Legacy mode will return OK here, debugfs api will return -EINVAL.
* -ENODEV is returned when PSR is unavailable.
+ * -ENOENT is returned when PSR debugfs api doesn't exist (i.e. using
+ * an older kernel).
*/
ret = psr_write(debugfs_fd, "0xf");
if (ret == -EINVAL)
@@ -103,11 +105,11 @@ static bool psr_set(int debugfs_fd, bool enable)
return false;
}
- if (ret == -EINVAL) {
- ret = psr_modparam_set(enable);
- } else {
+ if (ret == 0) {
ret = psr_write(debugfs_fd, enable ? "0x3" : "0x1");
igt_assert(ret > 0);
+ } else {
+ ret = psr_modparam_set(enable);
}
/* Restore original value on exit */
--
2.19.0
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next reply other threads:[~2018-10-17 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-17 21:26 Casey Bowman [this message]
2018-10-17 21:54 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for lib/igt_psr: Changed psr_set logic to account for older kernels Patchwork
2018-10-17 22:54 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-10-18 21:12 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Souza, Jose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181017212658.113049-1-casey.g.bowman@intel.com \
--to=casey.g.bowman@intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox