Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_flip: Add test to check suspend/resume

[Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1387 bytes --]

Hi,

On 01/18, Shayenne Moura wrote:
> This patch adds one test to evaluate suspend/resume operations using kms_flip.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shayenne Moura <shayenneluzmoura@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tests/kms_flip.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>  mode change 100644 => 100755 tests/kms_flip.c
> 
> diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
> old mode 100644
> new mode 100755
> index f28272dd..3ca2fdfc
> --- a/tests/kms_flip.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
> @@ -1567,6 +1567,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		{ 10, TEST_DPMS_OFF | TEST_DPMS | TEST_VBLANK_RACE, "dpms-vs-vblank-race" },
>  		{ 10, TEST_MODESET | TEST_VBLANK_RACE, "modeset-vs-vblank-race" },
>  		{ 0, TEST_BO_TOOBIG | TEST_NO_2X_OUTPUT, "bo-too-big" },
> +		{ 30, TEST_FLIP | TEST_SUSPEND, "flip-vs-suspend" },

I remember to follow a conversation in the IRC that you said that VKMS
pass this test. I tried it here on my VM, and after running the test my
system got freeze. My VM uses Arch Linux with Kernel 5.0.0-rc1. Did I
miss something?

Also, I tested it on my host machine with i915 driver and I noticed that
the test took much more than 30 seconds to finish. Is it right?

Thanks
Best Regards

>  	};
>  	int i;
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Rodrigo Siqueira
https://siqueira.tech
Graduate Student
Department of Computer Science
University of São Paulo

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 154 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev