public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
	Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	IGT development <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH] drm/doc: Make igts for cross-driver stuff mandatory
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:54:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190123105403.GD3271@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k1iv3d37.fsf@intel.com>

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:03:40PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019, "Wentland, Harry" <Harry.Wentland@amd.com> wrote:
> > Would it make sense to append something like ", if such a test can be
> > reasonably made using IGT for the target HW." to make it clear to
> > contributors that in cases like the one discussed this is at the
> > reviewers discretion?
> 
> I think the simplest change would be to say API changes SHOULD have
> driver-agnostic testcases, with the RFC 2119 meaning of SHOULD:
> 
>    SHOULD   This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
>    may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a
>    particular item, but the full implications must be understood and
>    carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
> 
> I.e. s/need/should/. I think it also catches the spirit of the
> discussion here; seems like everyone agrees having tests is a good goal.
> 
> You'll have to allow for reviewer/maintainer/community discretion no
> matter what. Judging by the discussion, CRC based tests don't currently
> meet the driver-agnostic requirement. Playing devil's advocate, you
> could argue any new APIs couldn't be tested with CRC either, even if it
> were the most reasonable approach for i915.

I think I'll combine both for v3, I wanted to do something like that
anyway to address Eric Anholt's similar concern.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-23 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-16 16:39 [igt-dev] [PATCH] drm/doc: Make igts for cross-driver stuff mandatory Daniel Vetter
2019-01-16 22:41 ` Eric Anholt
2019-01-17 11:50   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-17 11:01 ` Arkadiusz Hiler
2019-01-17 11:09   ` Petri Latvala
2019-01-17 11:38 ` Liviu Dudau
2019-01-17 11:52   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-17 12:26     ` Liviu Dudau
2019-01-17 12:32       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-17 14:54         ` Liviu Dudau
2019-01-17 15:59           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-18 11:19             ` Liviu Dudau
2019-01-21 11:54     ` Brian Starkey
2019-01-21 17:21       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-22  8:53         ` [igt-dev] " Daniel Vetter
2019-01-22 13:27           ` Brian Starkey
2019-01-22 14:03             ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-22 15:08               ` Brian Starkey
2019-01-22 15:17                 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-22 16:11                   ` Sean Paul
2019-01-22 16:28                     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-28 14:03                       ` Liviu Dudau
2019-01-28 17:21                         ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-22 19:00 ` Wentland, Harry
2019-01-22 19:19   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-22 19:42     ` Wentland, Harry
2019-01-22 19:53       ` Sean Paul
2019-01-23  9:46         ` Brian Starkey
2019-01-23 10:03       ` Daniel Stone
2019-01-23 10:11         ` Jani Nikula
2019-01-23 10:53           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-23 10:03       ` Jani Nikula
2019-01-23 10:54         ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-01-23  9:40     ` Brian Starkey
2019-01-23 10:50       ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190123105403.GD3271@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=petri.latvala@intel.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox