From: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Skip VBlank tests in modules without VBlank (rev3)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:53:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190207085333.GO4038@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190206173249.uercdo7bqkko5ksz@smtp.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:32:49PM -0200, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> On 01/27, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: Skip VBlank tests in modules without VBlank (rev3)
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48468/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_4791_full -> IGTPW_2301_full
> > ====================================================
> >
> > Summary
> > -------
> >
> > **FAILURE**
> >
> > Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_2301_full absolutely need to be
> > verified manually.
> >
> > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > introduced in IGTPW_2301_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
> > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> >
> > External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/48468/revisions/3/mbox/
> >
> > Possible new issues
> > -------------------
> >
> > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_2301_full:
> >
> > ### IGT changes ###
> >
> > #### Possible regressions ####
> >
> > * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us:
> > - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> DMESG-WARN
> > - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> DMESG-WARN
> > - shard-glk: NOTRUN -> DMESG-WARN
These are https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109467 I think
> >
> > * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@hang:
> > - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> FAIL
And this is https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109469
> I tried to figure out the reason for the failure described by the CI
> [1]; however, I can’t see any relationship between my patch and the
> problem reported by the CI. I tried to reproduce the CI results on my
> i915, but all the tests passed on my machine.
>
> I suspect this could be a false positive.
Yep, all false positives.
--
Petri Latvala
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-07 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-27 19:38 [igt-dev] [PATCH V3 i-g-t] Skip VBlank tests in modules without VBlank Rodrigo Siqueira
2019-01-27 20:12 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Skip VBlank tests in modules without VBlank (rev3) Patchwork
2019-01-27 23:44 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-02-06 17:32 ` Rodrigo Siqueira
2019-02-07 8:53 ` Petri Latvala [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190207085333.GO4038@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=petri.latvala@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox