From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, daniel@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v4 4/4] kms_content_protection: Macros repalces the constants
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:26:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211172649.GT23159@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549645030-7494-5-git-send-email-ramalingam.c@intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:27:10PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> For better readability numeric values are replaced with macros.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_content_protection.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_content_protection.c b/tests/kms_content_protection.c
> index c43e08b71a83..7fc8542e769a 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_content_protection.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_content_protection.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,16 @@ struct data {
> struct igt_fb red, green;
> } data;
>
Maybe add a comment that these should match the content protection
properties. Either way:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> +#define CP_UNDESIRED 0
> +#define CP_DESIRED 1
> +#define CP_ENABLED 2
> +
> +#define LIC_PERIOD_MSEC (4 * 1000)
> +/* Kernel retry count=3, Max time per authentication allowed = 6Sec */
> +#define KERNEL_AUTH_TIME_ALLOWED_MSEC (3 * 6 * 1000)
> +#define KERNEL_DISABLE_TIME_ALLOWED_MSEC (1 * 1000)
> +#define FLIP_EVENT_POLLING_TIMEOUT_MSEC 1000
> +
>
> static void flip_handler(int fd, unsigned int sequence, unsigned int tv_sec,
> unsigned int tv_usec, void *_data)
> @@ -57,7 +67,7 @@ static int wait_flip_event(void)
> pfd.events = POLLIN;
> pfd.revents = 0;
>
> - rc = poll(&pfd, 1, 1000);
> + rc = poll(&pfd, 1, FLIP_EVENT_POLLING_TIMEOUT_MSEC);
> switch (rc) {
> case 0:
> igt_info("Poll timeout. 1Sec.\n");
> @@ -154,11 +164,11 @@ static bool test_cp_enable(igt_output_t *output, enum igt_commit_style s)
> primary = igt_output_get_plane_type(output, DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY);
>
> igt_output_set_prop_value(output,
> - IGT_CONNECTOR_CONTENT_PROTECTION, 1);
> + IGT_CONNECTOR_CONTENT_PROTECTION, CP_DESIRED);
> igt_display_commit2(display, s);
>
> - /* Wait for 18000mSec (3 authentication * 6Sec) */
> - ret = wait_for_prop_value(output, 2, 18000);
> + ret = wait_for_prop_value(output, CP_ENABLED,
> + KERNEL_AUTH_TIME_ALLOWED_MSEC);
> if (ret) {
> igt_plane_set_fb(primary, &data.green);
> igt_display_commit2(display, s);
> @@ -179,12 +189,14 @@ static void test_cp_disable(igt_output_t *output, enum igt_commit_style s)
> * Even on HDCP enable failed scenario, IGT should exit leaving the
> * "content protection" at "UNDESIRED".
> */
> - igt_output_set_prop_value(output, IGT_CONNECTOR_CONTENT_PROTECTION, 0);
> + igt_output_set_prop_value(output, IGT_CONNECTOR_CONTENT_PROTECTION,
> + CP_UNDESIRED);
> igt_plane_set_fb(primary, &data.red);
> igt_display_commit2(display, s);
>
> /* Wait for HDCP to be disabled, before crtc off */
> - ret = wait_for_prop_value(output, 0, 1000);
> + ret = wait_for_prop_value(output, CP_UNDESIRED,
> + KERNEL_DISABLE_TIME_ALLOWED_MSEC);
> igt_assert_f(ret, "Content Protection not cleared\n");
> }
>
> @@ -219,7 +231,7 @@ static void test_cp_lic(igt_output_t *output)
> bool ret;
>
> /* Wait for 4Secs (min 2 cycles of Link Integrity Check) */
> - ret = wait_for_prop_value(output, 1, 4 * 1000);
> + ret = wait_for_prop_value(output, CP_DESIRED, LIC_PERIOD_MSEC);
> igt_assert_f(!ret, "Content Protection LIC Failed\n");
> }
>
> @@ -258,7 +270,8 @@ static void test_content_protection_on_output(igt_output_t *output,
> IGT_CRTC_ACTIVE, 1);
> igt_display_commit2(display, s);
>
> - ret = wait_for_prop_value(output, 2, 18000);
> + ret = wait_for_prop_value(output, CP_ENABLED,
> + KERNEL_AUTH_TIME_ALLOWED_MSEC);
> if (!ret)
> test_cp_enable_with_retry(output, s, 2);
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 16:57 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v4 0/4] HDCP test on modeset Ramalingam C
2019-02-08 16:57 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v4 1/4] kms_content_protection: modularizing the CP test steps Ramalingam C
2019-02-08 16:57 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v4 2/4] kms_content_protection: Test CP along with modeset Ramalingam C
2019-02-08 16:57 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v4 3/4] kms_content_protection: Confirm that LIC is passed Ramalingam C
2019-02-08 16:57 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v4 4/4] kms_content_protection: Macros repalces the constants Ramalingam C
2019-02-11 17:26 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-02-08 17:41 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for HDCP test on modeset Patchwork
2019-02-08 22:10 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190211172649.GT23159@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox