From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: IGT development <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib: Don't leak children in igt_waitchildren_timeout
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:46:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190212124655.GY23159@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154997336486.2447.5977084066251962615@skylake-alporthouse-com>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:09:25PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Vetter (2019-02-12 12:04:29)
> > Instead of cleaning up the mess in igt_exit make sure we don't even
> > let it out of the container. See also
> >
> > commit 754876378d6c9b2775e8c07b4d16f9878c55949f
> > Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Date: Fri Feb 26 22:11:10 2016 +0000
> >
> > igt/gem_sync: Enforce a timeout of 20s
> >
> > which added this helper.
> >
> > To make sure that everyone follows the rules, add an assert.
> >
> > We're keeping the cleanup code as a failsafe, and because it speeds
> > up the testcase I'm following up with.
> >
> > v2: Chris pointed out that my original patch did nothing. Which I
> > didn't catch because my testcase was also broken. Unfortunately this
> > means we need to open code part of the waiting.
> >
> > v3: The 2nd __igt_waitchildren() isn't necessary, __igt_waitchildren
> > recovers from EINTR already and keeps waiting (Chris Wilson).
> >
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/igt_core.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/igt_core.c b/lib/igt_core.c
> > index cbbe79f88070..fa73712ced91 100644
> > --- a/lib/igt_core.c
> > +++ b/lib/igt_core.c
> > @@ -1525,6 +1525,7 @@ void igt_exit(void)
> >
> > for (int c = 0; c < num_test_children; c++)
> > kill(test_children[c], SIGKILL);
> > + assert(!num_test_children);
> >
> > if (!test_with_subtests) {
> > struct timespec now;
> > @@ -1832,20 +1833,47 @@ void igt_waitchildren(void)
> > igt_fail(err);
> > }
> >
> > +static bool igt_killchidren_timed_out;
> > +
> > +static void igt_alarm_killchildren(int signal)
> > +{
> > + igt_info("Timed out waiting for children\n");
> > +
> > + igt_killchidren_timed_out = true;
> > +
> > + for (int c = 0; c < num_test_children; c++)
> > + kill(test_children[c], SIGKILL);
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * igt_waitchildren_timeout:
> > * @seconds: timeout in seconds to wait
> > * @reason: debug string explaining what timedout
> > *
> > - * Wait for all children forked with igt_fork, for a maximum of @seconds.
> > - *
> > - * Wraps igt_waitchildren() and igt_set_timeout()
> > + * Wait for all children forked with igt_fork, for a maximum of @seconds. If the
> > + * timeout expires, kills all children and cleans them up.
> > */
> > void igt_waitchildren_timeout(int seconds, const char *reason)
> > {
> > - igt_set_timeout(seconds, reason);
> > - igt_waitchildren();
> > + struct sigaction sa;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + sa.sa_handler = igt_alarm_killchildren;
> > + sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
> > + sa.sa_flags = 0;
> > +
> > + igt_killchidren_timed_out = false;
> > +
> > + sigaction(SIGALRM, &sa, NULL);
> > +
> > + alarm(seconds);
> > +
> > + ret = __igt_waitchildren();
> > + if (!igt_killchidren_timed_out && ret)
> > + igt_fail(ret);
> > igt_reset_timeout();
>
> Experience says to cancel the alarm as soon as you no longer need it.
>
> > + if (igt_killchidren_timed_out)
> > + igt_fail(IGT_EXIT_FAILURE);
>
> Something like
>
> ret = __igt_waitchildren();
> igt_reset_timeout();
> if (igt_killchildren_timed_out && !ret) // this should be impossible!
> ret = IGT_EXIT_FAILURE;
> if (ret)
> igt_fail(ret);
>
> Just to have only one path to the igt_fail. I'm not even sure about
> needing the igt_killchildren_timed_out; if no child was killed then we
> didn't exactly timeout :)
Hm right ordered this way we should either get a SIGKILL status in ret, or
it all worked out. I'll respin.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-12 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 18:02 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/9] lib/tests: Check that igt_assert forwards correctly through igt_fork Daniel Vetter
2019-02-11 18:02 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/9] lib/tests: make sure igt_skip in igt_fork is forbidden Daniel Vetter
2019-02-11 18:02 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/9] lib: Don't leak children in igt_waitchildren_timeout Daniel Vetter
2019-02-11 21:03 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 22:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-02-11 23:01 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-12 8:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-02-12 12:04 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Daniel Vetter
2019-02-12 12:09 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-12 12:46 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-02-12 16:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-02-12 16:08 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-13 10:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-02-11 18:02 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 4/9] tests/gem_exec_reuse: Don't leak the hang detector Daniel Vetter
2019-02-11 18:06 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 18:02 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 5/9] tests/i915_missed_irq: Don't leave the hang detector hanging Daniel Vetter
2019-02-11 18:08 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 18:02 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 6/9] lib/tests: make sure we catch igt_fork leaks Daniel Vetter
2019-02-12 16:00 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Daniel Vetter
2019-02-11 18:02 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 7/9] lib: Make sure we leak no child processes Daniel Vetter
2019-02-11 21:06 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 22:43 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Daniel Vetter
2019-02-12 16:48 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 18:02 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 8/9] lib: Drop igt_child_done Daniel Vetter
2019-02-11 18:02 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 9/9] lib: Drop IGT_EXIT_TIMEOUT Daniel Vetter
2019-02-11 18:27 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/9] lib/tests: Check that igt_assert forwards correctly through igt_fork Patchwork
2019-02-11 22:15 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-02-12 12:46 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/9] lib/tests: Check that igt_assert forwards correctly through igt_fork (rev2) Patchwork
2019-02-12 14:59 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-02-12 16:09 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [i-g-t,1/9] lib/tests: Check that igt_assert forwards correctly through igt_fork (rev4) Patchwork
2019-02-12 16:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/9] lib/tests: Check that igt_assert forwards correctly through igt_fork Chris Wilson
2019-02-13 10:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-02-12 17:51 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [i-g-t,1/9] lib/tests: Check that igt_assert forwards correctly through igt_fork (rev5) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190212124655.GY23159@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox