Re: [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for tests/kms_concurrent: Allow the test to proceed with fewer planes

[Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>]

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:28:12AM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 21:21 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: tests/kms_concurrent: Allow the test to proceed with fewer
> > planes
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/58872/
> > State : failure
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_4920_full -> IGTPW_2760_full
> > ====================================================
> > 
> > Summary
> > -------
> > 
> >   **FAILURE**
> > 
> >   Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_2760_full absolutely need
> > to be
> >   verified manually.
> >   
> >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the
> > changes
> >   introduced in IGTPW_2760_full, please notify your bug team to allow
> > them
> >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
> > positives in CI.
> > 
> >   External URL: 
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/58872/revisions/1/mbox/
> > 
> > Possible new issues
> > -------------------
> > 
> >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > IGTPW_2760_full:
> > 
> > ### IGT changes ###
> > 
> > #### Possible regressions ####
> > 
> >   * igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-ts-continuation-modeset:
> >     - shard-kbl:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
> Not related at all.
> 
> Patch pushed.

See my reply, I think we now have a test gap. Can you pls fill that again?

I know there's a pile of pressure, but that's no good reason to rush
stuff.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev