From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_panel_fitting: Fix plane scaling avoidance on gen7/gen8
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 19:51:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190902165141.GY7482@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190830223023.16396-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 03:30:23PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> Most gen7 and gen8 platforms can't do plane scaling, so we need to
> ensure the test doesn't try to do plane scaling on those platforms. The
> legacy non-atomic subtest bakes these platform characteristics into the
> test itself since legacy modesetting interfaces don't provide a way to
> probe platform capabilities like atomic does.
>
> Maarten previously tried to address this with commit 24c5e0778
> ("tests/kms_panel_fitting: Do not use scaling on gen7 and gen8, v2."),
> but he augmented an existing test for gen9+pipeC which comes too late
> since we've already turned on the plane at that point. We can fix this
> by moving the test up higher; not only before we enable panel fitting,
> but also before we turn on the sprite.
>
> Note that this still isn't a great subtest since it's very
> Intel-specific, despite being part of a generic KMS test that's intended
> for all vendors. A future enhancement might be to try to probe the
> platform capabilities with a TEST_ONLY atomic operation before using the
> legacy interfaces to actually program them.
>
> While touching the code, I also added some slight restructuring, added
> additional comments, and broke up >80 char lines to add clarity to
> what's going on.
>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_panel_fitting.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c b/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
> index 491e429f..a942294b 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
> @@ -131,11 +131,10 @@ static void test_panel_fitting(data_t *d)
> igt_fb_set_position(&d->fb2, d->plane2, 100, 100);
> igt_fb_set_size(&d->fb2, d->plane2, d->fb2.width-200, d->fb2.height-200);
> igt_plane_set_position(d->plane2, 100, 100);
> - igt_plane_set_size(d->plane2, mode->hdisplay-200, mode->vdisplay-200);
> - igt_display_commit2(display, COMMIT_UNIVERSAL);
>
> /*
> - * most of gen7 and all of gen8 doesn't support scaling at all.
> + * Most of gen7 and all of gen8 doesn't support plane scaling
> + * at all.
> *
> * gen9 pipe C has only 1 scaler shared with the crtc, which
> * means pipe scaling can't work simultaneously with panel
> @@ -144,9 +143,24 @@ static void test_panel_fitting(data_t *d)
> * Since this is the legacy path, userspace has to know about
> * the HW limitations, whereas atomic can ask.
> */
> - if (IS_GEN8(devid) || (IS_GEN7(devid) && !IS_IVYBRIDGE(devid)) ||
> + if (IS_GEN8(devid) ||
> + (IS_GEN7(devid) && !IS_IVYBRIDGE(devid)) ||
> (IS_GEN9(devid) && pipe == PIPE_C))
> - igt_plane_set_size(d->plane2, d->fb2.width-200, d->fb2.height-200);
> + /* same as visible area of fb => no scaling */
> + igt_plane_set_size(d->plane2,
> + d->fb2.width-200,
> + d->fb2.height-200);
> + else
> + /*
> + * different than visible area of fb => plane scaling
> + * active
> + */
> + igt_plane_set_size(d->plane2,
> + mode->hdisplay-200,
> + mode->vdisplay-200);
> +
> + /* Plane scaling active (if possible), pfit off */
> + igt_display_commit2(display, COMMIT_UNIVERSAL);
>
> /* enable panel fitting along with sprite scaling */
> mode->hdisplay = 1024;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-02 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-30 22:30 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_panel_fitting: Fix plane scaling avoidance on gen7/gen8 Matt Roper
2019-08-30 23:09 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2019-08-31 23:15 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-09-02 16:51 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-09-02 21:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190902165141.GY7482@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox