From: "Zbigniew Kempczyński" <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib: Fix device lists not cleaned up sufficiently before rescan
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:23:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200402172313.GA17522@zkempczy-mobl2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200320153623.4780-1-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 04:36:23PM +0100, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Some effort is already taken to clean up previous content of device
> lists before forced device rescan is performed but it is not
> sufficient. An attempt to use forced device rescan in a test results
> in that test crashing or spinning until being killed by OOM killer.
> Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> lib/igt_device_scan.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_device_scan.c b/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> index b3f79c81e..db4da30d3 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> @@ -353,14 +353,11 @@ static void set_vendor_device(struct igt_device *dev)
> dev->device = strndup(pci_id + 5, 4);
> }
>
> -/* Allocate arrays for keeping scanned devices */
> +/* Initialize lists for keeping scanned devices */
> static bool prepare_scan(void)
> {
> - if (igt_devs.all.prev == NULL || igt_devs.all.next == NULL)
> - IGT_INIT_LIST_HEAD(&igt_devs.all);
> -
> - if (igt_devs.filtered.prev == NULL || igt_devs.filtered.next == NULL)
> - IGT_INIT_LIST_HEAD(&igt_devs.filtered);
> + IGT_INIT_LIST_HEAD(&igt_devs.all);
> + IGT_INIT_LIST_HEAD(&igt_devs.filtered);
I think above change according to the change below is not required.
>
> return true;
> }
> @@ -595,8 +592,15 @@ void igt_devices_scan(bool force)
> {
> if (force && igt_devs.devs_scanned) {
> struct igt_device *dev, *tmp;
> +
> + igt_list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &igt_devs.filtered,
> + link) {
> + igt_list_del(&dev->link);
> + free(dev);
> + }
> igt_list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &igt_devs.all, link) {
> igt_device_free(dev);
> + igt_list_del(&dev->link);
> free(dev);
> }
>
> --
> 2.21.1
>
Yes, that part is what we need to fix the leak.
Reviewed-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-02 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-20 15:36 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib: Fix device lists not cleaned up sufficiently before rescan Janusz Krzysztofik
2020-03-20 16:07 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-03-20 21:52 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-04-02 17:23 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński [this message]
2020-04-02 18:12 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2020-04-02 18:31 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200402172313.GA17522@zkempczy-mobl2 \
--to=zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
--cc=petri.latvala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox