From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:01:49 +0300 From: Petri Latvala Message-ID: <20200406090149.GK9497@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20200406085309.1585743-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200406085309.1585743-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/perf_pmu: Add the missing igt_dynamic to dynamic rcs* test selection List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" To: Chris Wilson Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:53:09AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > An important ingredient to using igt_subtest_with_dynamic is to include > an igt_dynamic at some point. > > Reported-by: Petri Latvala > Fixes: 311cb1b360b7 ("i915/perf_pmu: Dynamic active engine tests") > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > Cc: Petri Latvala Thanks, Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala If someone (tm) is feeling like there's not enough to do, perf_pmu could use a refactoring with the dynamic subtests to do igt_subtest_with_dynamic() { igt_require(system-wide things); igt_dynamic_f() { igt_require(engine-specific thing); } } so that skips happen for a whole subtest at a time for things like gen checks. _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev