Re: [igt-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/2] tests/kms_vrr: Use atomic API for page flip

["Navare, Manasi" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>]

@Harry and @Nicholas, could you run kms_vrr IGT with this patch on AMD
to see that with teh atomic API, it doesnt break VRR on AMD?

Regards
Manasi

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 09:16:59PM -0700, Modem, Bhanuprakash wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Navare, Manasi D <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 12:41 AM
> > To: Modem, Bhanuprakash <bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
> > Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org; harry.wentland@amd.com;
> > nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com; Kiran, Pichika Uday
> > <pichika.uday.kiran@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] tests/kms_vrr: Use atomic API for page flip
> >
> > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:56:46AM +0530, bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com
> > wrote:
> > > From: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
> > >
> > > We should avoid using drmModePageFlip as it'll only be used for
> > > legacy drivers, instead, use igt_display_commit_atomic() API to
> > > page flip for atomic display code path.
> > >
> > > Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
> > > Cc: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
> > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
> >
> > I have tested this on i915 and the page flips are captured correctly with
> > non blocking page flip requests using atomic_commit call.
> >
> > @Harry, @Nicholas could you test this on AMD driver to make
> > sure its not breaking anything?
> [Bhanu]
> @Harry, @Nicholas did you get a chance to check this patch?
> >
> > Manasi
> >
> > > ---
> > >  tests/kms_vrr.c | 39 ++++++++++-----------------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/kms_vrr.c b/tests/kms_vrr.c
> > > index 73115fef..0fe28931 100644
> > > --- a/tests/kms_vrr.c
> > > +++ b/tests/kms_vrr.c
> > > @@ -126,11 +126,11 @@ static range_t get_vrr_range(data_t *data,
> > igt_output_t *output)
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  /* Returns a suitable vrr test frequency. */
> > > -static uint32_t get_test_rate_ns(data_t *data, igt_output_t *output)
> > > +static uint64_t get_test_rate_ns(data_t *data, igt_output_t *output)
> > >  {
> > >  drmModeModeInfo *mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
> > >  range_t range;
> > > -uint32_t vtest;
> > > +uint64_t vtest;
> > >
> > >  /*
> > >   * The frequency with the fastest convergence speed should be
> > > @@ -210,32 +210,18 @@ wait_for_vblank(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe)
> > >  return get_vblank_event_ns(data);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -/* Performs an asynchronous non-blocking page-flip on a pipe. */
> > > -static int
> > > +/* Performs an atomic non-blocking page-flip on a pipe. */
> > > +static void
> > >  do_flip(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe_id, igt_fb_t *fb)
> > >  {
> > > -igt_pipe_t *pipe = &data->display.pipes[pipe_id];
> > > -int ret;
> > > -
> > >  igt_set_timeout(1, "Scheduling page flip\n");
> > >
> > > -/*
> > > - * Only the legacy flip ioctl supports async flips.
> > > - * It's also non-blocking, but returns -EBUSY if flipping too fast.
> > > - * 2x monitor tests will need async flips in the atomic API.
> > > - */
> > > -do {
> > > -ret = drmModePageFlip(data->drm_fd, pipe->crtc_id,
> > > -      fb->fb_id,
> > > -      DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_EVENT |
> > > -      DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC,
> > > -      data);
> > > -} while (ret == -EBUSY);
> > > -
> > > -igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> > > -igt_reset_timeout();
> > > +igt_display_commit_atomic(&data->display,
> > > +  DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_NONBLOCK |
> > > +  DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_EVENT,
> > > +  NULL);
> > >
> > > -return 0;
> > > +igt_reset_timeout();
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  /*
> > > @@ -246,11 +232,6 @@ do_flip(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe_id, igt_fb_t
> > *fb)
> > >   * can arbitrarily restrict the bounds further than the absolute
> > >   * min and max range. But VRR is really about extending the flip
> > >   * to prevent stuttering or to match a source content rate.
> > > - *
> > > - * The only way to "present" at a fixed rate like userspace in a vendor
> > > - * neutral manner is to do it with async flips. This avoids the need
> > > - * to wait for next vblank and it should eventually converge at the
> > > - * desired rate.
> > >   */
> > >  static uint32_t
> > >  flip_and_measure(data_t *data, igt_output_t *output, enum pipe pipe,
> > > @@ -271,7 +252,7 @@ flip_and_measure(data_t *data, igt_output_t *output,
> > enum pipe pipe,
> > >  front = !front;
> > >  do_flip(data, pipe, front ? &data->fb1 : &data->fb0);
> > >
> > > -vblank_ns = get_vblank_event_ns(data);
> > > +vblank_ns = wait_for_vblank(data, pipe);
> > >  diff_ns = rate_ns - (vblank_ns - last_vblank_ns);
> > >  last_vblank_ns = vblank_ns;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.24.1.1.gb6d4d82bd5
> > >
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev