From: Kunal Joshi <kunal1.joshi@intel.com>
To: Martin Peres <martin.peres@mupuf.org>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, petri.latvala@intel.com
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_kms: only check chamelium's presence in chamelium tests
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:59:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210322072923.GA20972@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3a01f1b-3805-2ee8-866c-daa9086c893b@mupuf.org>
On 2021-03-22 at 08:29:02 +0200, Martin Peres wrote:
> On 22/03/2021 07:26, Kunal Joshi wrote:
> > Avoid checking if chamelium is present or not in non chamelium
> > tests as its just an overhead.
>
> The point of doing this was to stop having screens in CI and instead mostly
> have chameliums. This means that we need to make sure the chamelium exposes
> all the ports before starting a KMS test, since some tests may have left the
> screens disconnected.
>
> Is that making sense?
Thanks martin for having a look and yeah i got your point,
But for checking all the ports are connected we can have a script which
checks it before the execution starts rather than checking it everytime
Currently when chamelium is not reachable we get SIGQUIT on all the
tests
Starting subtest: basic-fence-flip
Received signal SIGQUIT.
Stack trace:
#0 [fatal_sig_handler+0xd6]
#1 [killpg+0x40]
#2 [pselect+0x59]
#3 [xmlrpc_server_info_disallow_auth_ntlm+0x389]
#4 [xmlrpc_server_info_disallow_auth_ntlm+0x786]
#5 [xmlrpc_server_info_disallow_auth_ntlm+0xd1f]
#6 [xmlrpc_client_call2+0xa8]
#7 [xmlrpc_client_call2f_va+0x9e]
#8 [__chamelium_rpc_va+0x87]
#9 [__chamelium_rpc.constprop.8+0x8c]
#10 [chamelium_wait_reachable+0x65]
#11 [igt_display_require+0xbe]
#12 [test_flip+0x4b]
#13 [__real_main1093+0x1c38]
#14 [main+0x27]
#15 [__libc_start_main+0xe7]
#16 [_start+0x2a]
When chamelium is not reachable chamelium_wait_reachable() never returns
back and we have inactivity timeout which kills the test.
Regards
Kunal Joshi
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-22 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-22 5:26 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_kms: only check chamelium's presence in chamelium tests Kunal Joshi
2021-03-22 6:29 ` Martin Peres
2021-03-22 7:29 ` Kunal Joshi [this message]
2021-03-22 8:16 ` Martin Peres
2021-03-22 8:39 ` Kunal Joshi
2021-03-22 8:50 ` Martin Peres
2021-03-22 8:21 ` Petri Latvala
2021-03-22 6:41 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-03-22 7:54 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210322072923.GA20972@intel.com \
--to=kunal1.joshi@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=martin.peres@mupuf.org \
--cc=petri.latvala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox