From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 522E210E22B for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 03:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:20:23 -0800 From: Matthew Brost Message-ID: <20211210032023.GA22348@jons-linux-dev-box> References: <20211209082053.1412439-1-mastanx.katragadda@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211209082053.1412439-1-mastanx.katragadda@intel.com> Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [i-g-t] tests/i915/exec_balancer: Added Skip Guc Submission List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" To: Mastan Katragadda Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org List-ID: On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 01:50:53PM +0530, Mastan Katragadda wrote: > This test makes assumptions about the backend scheduling algorithm that > a real world UMD would never assume. This test is not testing a UMD-KMD > contract, rather a specific backend.It is an invalid test case thus we > are skipping. > > Changes Since v1: > -Updated commit message > > Cc: Matthew Brost > Signed-off-by: Mastan Katragadda Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost > --- > tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c > index cc07a5a9..d58734ab 100644 > --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c > @@ -3320,6 +3320,7 @@ igt_main > > igt_subtest_group { > igt_fixture { > + igt_require(!gem_using_guc_submission(i915)); > intel_allocator_multiprocess_start(); > } > > -- > 2.25.1 >