From: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] Fix PMU freq verification with SLPC
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 20:41:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230105044144.3982688-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
With SLPC, even when we set the same min and max freq's, the requested and
actual freq's can differ from the min/max freq set. For example "efficient
freq" (when in effect) can override set min/max freq. In general FW is the
final arbiter in determining freq and can override set values.
Therefore compare the requested freq reported by PMU not against the set
freq's but against the requested freq reported in sysfs.
v2: Remove v1 patches which need to be redone. In v2 just add failing tests
to BAT testlist to try to repro the failures
v3: Add modified v1 patches with minimal changes which are expected to fix
the two issues
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6806
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6786
Ashutosh Dixit (3):
tests/perf_pmu: Compare against requested freq in frequency subtest
tests/gem_ctx_freq: Compare against requested freq
HAX: Add gem_ctx_freq@sysfs and perf_pmu@frequency to
fast-feedback.testlist
tests/i915/gem_ctx_freq.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 5 +++--
tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 2 ++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.38.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-05 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-05 4:41 Ashutosh Dixit [this message]
2023-01-05 4:41 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] tests/perf_pmu: Compare against requested freq in frequency subtest Ashutosh Dixit
2023-01-05 4:41 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/gem_ctx_freq: Compare against requested freq Ashutosh Dixit
2023-01-05 4:41 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] HAX: Add gem_ctx_freq@sysfs and perf_pmu@frequency to fast-feedback.testlist Ashutosh Dixit
2023-01-05 5:38 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Fix PMU freq verification with SLPC (rev3) Patchwork
2023-01-05 7:09 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-01-05 15:33 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Fix PMU freq verification with SLPC (rev4) Patchwork
2023-01-06 10:29 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-07 1:11 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] Fix PMU freq verification with SLPC Ashutosh Dixit
2023-01-10 19:47 Ashutosh Dixit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230105044144.3982688-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox