From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B31710E2BB for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 16:54:36 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?q?Zbigniew=20Kempczy=C5=84ski?= To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 18:54:17 +0200 Message-Id: <20230529165417.347129-3-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20230529165417.347129-1-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> References: <20230529165417.347129-1-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] lib/intel_batchbuffer: Use COMPUTE instead RENDER engine for Xe on PVC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" List-ID: For gpgpu fill currently we select I915_EXEC_RENDER which is correct as pipeline selection allows to submit compute job on it. However newer platforms like PVC have no render engine so replacing to compute engine is necessary. At the moment this is workaround - more rework in intel-bb is necessary to better support both - i915 and xe. Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński Cc: Kamil Konieczny --- lib/intel_batchbuffer.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/intel_batchbuffer.c b/lib/intel_batchbuffer.c index 9f65536173..71f62973c8 100644 --- a/lib/intel_batchbuffer.c +++ b/lib/intel_batchbuffer.c @@ -2315,7 +2315,10 @@ __xe_bb_exec(struct intel_bb *ibb, uint64_t flags, bool sync) inst.engine_class = DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE; break; case I915_EXEC_RENDER: - inst.engine_class = DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER; + if (IS_PONTEVECCHIO(xe_dev_id(ibb->fd))) + inst.engine_class = DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE; + else + inst.engine_class = DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER; break; case I915_EXEC_VEBOX: inst.engine_class = DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE; -- 2.34.1