From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/i915_pm_rps: Fix test after silent conflict
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:12:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230717171219.832728-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230717165318.831766-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
A silent conflict sneaked in as I was merging
d86ca7e17b58 ("tests/i915_pm_rps: Exercise sysfs thresholds") in a way
that igt_sysfs_set_u32 has became a function returning void.
Assert is now built-in so drop it from the test.
v2:
* Fix invalid value test.
* Assert new values after write while at it.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: d86ca7e17b58 ("tests/i915_pm_rps: Exercise sysfs thresholds")
Reference: 54dc25efaf10 ("lib/igt_sysfs: add asserting helpers for read/write operations")
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
Cc: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>
---
tests/i915/i915_pm_rps.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_rps.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_rps.c
index 68bb99d62c19..15c74cc703c2 100644
--- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_rps.c
+++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_rps.c
@@ -988,6 +988,28 @@ static igt_spin_t *spin_sync_gt(int i915, uint64_t ahnd, unsigned int gt,
return __igt_sync_spin(i915, ahnd, *ctx, &e);
}
+static void sysfs_fail_set_u32(int dir, const char *attr, uint32_t set)
+{
+ u32 old, new;
+ bool ret;
+
+ old = igt_sysfs_get_u32(dir, attr);
+ ret = __igt_sysfs_set_u32(dir, attr, set);
+ igt_assert_eq(ret, false);
+ new = igt_sysfs_get_u32(dir, attr);
+ igt_assert_eq(old, new);
+}
+
+static void sysfs_set_u32(int dir, const char *attr, uint32_t set)
+{
+ u32 new;
+
+ igt_sysfs_set_u32(dir, attr, set);
+
+ new = igt_sysfs_get_u32(dir, attr);
+ igt_assert_eq(set, new);
+}
+
#define TEST_IDLE 0x1
#define TEST_PARK 0x2
static void test_thresholds(int i915, unsigned int gt, unsigned int flags)
@@ -1010,8 +1032,8 @@ static void test_thresholds(int i915, unsigned int gt, unsigned int flags)
igt_require(def_up && def_down);
/* Check invalid percentages are rejected */
- igt_assert_eq(igt_sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "rps_up_threshold_pct", 101), false);
- igt_assert_eq(igt_sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "rps_down_threshold_pct", 101), false);
+ sysfs_fail_set_u32(sysfs, "rps_up_threshold_pct", 101);
+ sysfs_fail_set_u32(sysfs, "rps_down_threshold_pct", 101);
/*
* Invent some random up-down thresholds, but always include 0 and 100
@@ -1034,8 +1056,8 @@ static void test_thresholds(int i915, unsigned int gt, unsigned int flags)
/* Exercise the thresholds with a GPU load to trigger park/unpark etc */
for (i = 0; i < points; i++) {
igt_info("Testing thresholds up %u%% and down %u%%...\n", ta[i], tb[i]);
- igt_assert_eq(igt_sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "rps_up_threshold_pct", ta[i]), true);
- igt_assert_eq(igt_sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "rps_down_threshold_pct", tb[i]), true);
+ sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "rps_up_threshold_pct", ta[i]);
+ sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "rps_down_threshold_pct", tb[i]);
if (flags & TEST_IDLE) {
gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
@@ -1069,8 +1091,8 @@ static void test_thresholds(int i915, unsigned int gt, unsigned int flags)
gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
/* Restore defaults */
- igt_assert_eq(igt_sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "rps_up_threshold_pct", def_up), true);
- igt_assert_eq(igt_sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "rps_down_threshold_pct", def_down), true);
+ sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "rps_up_threshold_pct", def_up);
+ sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "rps_down_threshold_pct", def_down);
free(ta);
free(tb);
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-17 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-17 16:53 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_rps: Fix test after silent conflict Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-17 17:05 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
2023-07-17 17:12 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2023-07-17 18:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-17 19:33 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-18 7:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-17 17:37 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for tests/i915_pm_rps: Fix test after silent conflict (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230717171219.832728-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox