From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH 3/4] xe_exec_basic: Add section to test zero number of BB in exec IOCTL
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 18:21:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230727012136.456190-4-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230727012136.456190-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Verify the exec queue ordering works wrt out-sync signaling when zero
number of BB passed to exec IOCTL.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
tests/xe/xe_exec_basic.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 107 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/xe/xe_exec_basic.c b/tests/xe/xe_exec_basic.c
index 33750458e9..259e5e158a 100644
--- a/tests/xe/xe_exec_basic.c
+++ b/tests/xe/xe_exec_basic.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include "xe/xe_ioctl.h"
#include "xe/xe_query.h"
+#include "xe/xe_spin.h"
#include <string.h>
#define MAX_N_ENGINES 16
@@ -300,6 +301,108 @@ test_exec(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
}
}
+/**
+ * SUBTEST: zero-execs
+ * Description: Test zero execs in IOCTL
+ * Functionality: exec IOCTL
+ * Run type: BAT
+ */
+
+static void test_zero_execs(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
+ int n_execs)
+{
+ uint32_t vm;
+ uint64_t addr = 0x1a0000;
+ struct drm_xe_sync sync[2] = {
+ { .flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_SYNCOBJ | DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL, },
+ { .flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_SYNCOBJ | DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL, },
+ };
+ struct drm_xe_exec exec = {
+ .num_batch_buffer = 1,
+ .num_syncs = 1,
+ .syncs = to_user_pointer(sync),
+ };
+ size_t bo_size;
+ uint32_t bo = 0;
+ uint32_t syncobj;
+ uint32_t engine;
+ struct xe_cork cork;
+ struct {
+ uint32_t batch[16];
+ uint64_t pad;
+ uint32_t data;
+ } *data;
+ int i, b;
+
+ vm = xe_vm_create(fd, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_ASYNC_DEFAULT, 0);
+ bo_size = sizeof(*data) * n_execs;
+ bo_size = ALIGN(bo_size + xe_cs_prefetch_size(fd),
+ xe_get_default_alignment(fd));
+ bo = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size,
+ visible_vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id));
+ data = xe_bo_map(fd, bo, bo_size);
+ engine = xe_engine_create(fd, vm, eci, 0);
+
+ xe_cork_init(fd, eci, &cork);
+ xe_cork_wait_started(&cork);
+
+ /* Initial bind behind cork */
+ sync[0].handle = syncobj = syncobj_create(fd, 0);
+ sync[0].flags |= DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL;
+ sync[1].handle = cork.syncobj;
+ sync[1].flags &= ~DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL;
+ xe_vm_bind_async(fd, vm, 0, bo, 0, addr, bo_size, sync, 2);
+
+ /* Exec behind bind */
+ for (i = 0; i < n_execs; i++) {
+ uint64_t batch_offset = (char *)&data[i].batch - (char *)data;
+ uint64_t batch_addr = addr + batch_offset;
+ uint64_t sdi_offset = (char *)&data[i].data - (char *)data;
+ uint64_t sdi_addr = addr + sdi_offset;
+
+ b = 0;
+ data[i].batch[b++] = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
+ data[i].batch[b++] = sdi_addr;
+ data[i].batch[b++] = sdi_addr >> 32;
+ data[i].batch[b++] = 0xc0ffee;
+ data[i].batch[b++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
+ igt_assert(b <= ARRAY_SIZE(data[i].batch));
+
+ sync[0].flags &= ~DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL;
+
+ exec.engine_id = engine;
+ exec.address = batch_addr;
+ xe_exec(fd, &exec);
+ }
+
+ /* Exec with no batch buffer */
+ sync[0].handle = syncobj_create(fd, 0);
+ sync[0].flags |= DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL;
+ exec.num_batch_buffer = 0;
+ exec.address = 0;
+ xe_exec(fd, &exec);
+
+ /* Let jobs runs for a bit */
+ usleep(100000);
+
+ /* both bind and execs are waiting */
+ igt_assert(!syncobj_wait(fd, &syncobj, 1, 0, 0, NULL));
+ igt_assert(!syncobj_wait(fd, &sync[0].handle, 1, 0, 0, NULL));
+
+ /* Release cork */
+ xe_cork_end(&cork);
+ xe_cork_wait_done(&cork);
+ xe_cork_fini(&cork);
+
+ /* both binds are done */
+ igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &syncobj, 1, INT64_MAX, 0, NULL));
+ igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &sync[0].handle, 1, INT64_MAX, 0, NULL));
+
+ syncobj_destroy(fd, sync[0].handle);
+ gem_close(fd, bo);
+ xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
+}
+
igt_main
{
struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
@@ -369,6 +472,10 @@ igt_main
test_exec(fd, hwe, 1, 0, 1, s->flags);
}
+ igt_subtest("zero-execs")
+ xe_for_each_hw_engine(fd, hwe)
+ test_zero_execs(fd, hwe, 1);
+
igt_fixture
drm_close_driver(fd);
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-27 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-27 1:21 [igt-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Add tests for upcoming uAPI / IOCTL behavior changes Matthew Brost
2023-07-27 1:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 1/4] xe: Update to new VM bind uAPI Matthew Brost
2023-07-27 1:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 2/4] xe_vm: Add section to test zero number of VM binds Matthew Brost
2023-07-27 1:21 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2023-07-27 1:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 4/4] xe_vm: Add EIO test Matthew Brost
2023-07-27 2:47 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Add tests for upcoming uAPI / IOCTL behavior changes Patchwork
2023-07-27 4:09 ` [igt-dev] ○ CI.xeBAT: info " Patchwork
2023-07-27 6:29 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230727012136.456190-4-matthew.brost@intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox