From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF05C10E7D3 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:21:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Badal Nilawar To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 15:59:46 +0530 Message-Id: <20231124102946.2650848-3-badal.nilawar@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20231124102946.2650848-1-badal.nilawar@intel.com> References: <20231124102946.2650848-1-badal.nilawar@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] test/intel/xe_guc_pc: Fix freq_low_max test List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" List-ID: freq_low_max test is intended to validate GuC PC (SLPC) behaviour when max freq set to less than min freq. As workloads are not being run validating cur freq is enough. Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar --- tests/intel/xe_guc_pc.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_guc_pc.c b/tests/intel/xe_guc_pc.c index c23017501..70548ba0e 100644 --- a/tests/intel/xe_guc_pc.c +++ b/tests/intel/xe_guc_pc.c @@ -220,7 +220,6 @@ static void test_freq_low_max(int fd, int gt_id) igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpn) > 0); usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US); igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "cur") == rpe); - igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act") == rpe); } /** -- 2.25.1