From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52F73C47DDB for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D6310E64F; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F092710E64F for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:07:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1706782054; x=1738318054; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=8RqlTa4ZnlGcF8JfFylx7LE4qZzbPMCgzWUhAIYgGuo=; b=G6osLuMxLURbcB1NFUJL/K+cdhmaA5KgKEUwhJlU9+GEHhbuw7yLGq3k RTc9jf29SYzVZQhjFUkmLF3Et4ws4s6bYIwSYu0y8Qfc+plm+a6JgzJx4 k4hgBXRUeSvWqcktJOffMDdbQ2JQKyOiBd6J9ZDrzeq879C4ElDTHOr/j 1NkEEO1U/qCf2TwoORCQtw+BQSiv2D/fb4WZdbMWCH9Ibzqfh0QlA+y4J GUcXk4hJfmw+TmuDJUVhnIMkyiFaw38fP4dnjBYTr1fXzDYEJ0/326rky mayQ3IUDgsHKEio8xy76oIG79jwdWq7p9GQqmi27TC4mM+DxaHSAhPeBn A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10969"; a="435022834" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,234,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="435022834" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2024 02:07:32 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,234,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="45795" Received: from kniesyn-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.112.105]) by orviesa008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2024 02:07:30 -0800 From: =?UTF-8?q?Zbigniew=20Kempczy=C5=84ski?= To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [PATCH i-g-t v4 0/5] Fill block-copy test gap for unaligned sizes Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 11:07:19 +0100 Message-Id: <20240201100724.257845-1-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development mailing list for IGT GPU Tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" Using 512x512 resolution for testing is too optimistic and hides intel_blt limitation for using different (smaller) resolutions which also might not be aligned to expected stride and height. Address this by adding few helpers, change blt buffer creation size calculation and add "increment" version of the test in xe_ccs. v2: fix handling Tile64 what also requires bpp in dumping to png as helper for aligned height depend on it v3: fix xmajor stride + make helpers public v4: use original width/height on filename write to png, extend fast-copy with different sizes test Zbigniew Kempczyński (4): lib/intel_blt: Add helpers for calculating stride and aligned height lib/intel_blt: Change surface size calculation lib/intel_blt: Use object pitch and aligned height on png write tests/xe-ccs: Add tests which exercise small to large blit sizes tests/xe_exercise_blt: Exercise small to large fast-copy blits lib/intel_blt.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++- lib/intel_blt.h | 6 +- tests/intel/gem_ccs.c | 23 ++--- tests/intel/gem_exercise_blt.c | 16 ++-- tests/intel/xe_ccs.c | 167 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- tests/intel/xe_exercise_blt.c | 79 ++++++++++++---- 6 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1