From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] drm-uapi/xe: Add device atomics vm bind flags
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:57:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240412085744.21196-2-nirmoy.das@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240412085744.21196-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Align with commit ("drm/xe/uapi: Introduce VMA bind flag for device
atomics")
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
---
include/drm-uapi/xe_drm.h | 17 +++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/drm-uapi/xe_drm.h b/include/drm-uapi/xe_drm.h
index 4353595a4..9171cc0f1 100644
--- a/include/drm-uapi/xe_drm.h
+++ b/include/drm-uapi/xe_drm.h
@@ -881,6 +881,14 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_destroy {
* will only be valid for DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_MAP operations, the BO
* handle MBZ, and the BO offset MBZ. This flag is intended to
* implement VK sparse bindings.
+ * - %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_DEVICE_ATOMICS - When this flag is set for
+ * a VA range, all the corresponding PTEs will have atomic access bit
+ * set. This will allow device atomics operation for that VA range.
+ * This flag only works for single placement buffer objects and
+ * mainly for SMEM only buffer objects where CPU atomics can be perform
+ * by an application and so KMD can not set device atomics on such buffers
+ * by default. This flag has no effect on LMEM only placed buffers as atomic
+ * access bit is set for LMEM backed PTEs always.
*/
struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op {
/** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
@@ -967,10 +975,11 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op {
/** @op: Bind operation to perform */
__u32 op;
-#define DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_READONLY (1 << 0)
-#define DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_IMMEDIATE (1 << 1)
-#define DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_NULL (1 << 2)
-#define DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_DUMPABLE (1 << 3)
+#define DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_READONLY (1 << 0)
+#define DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_IMMEDIATE (1 << 1)
+#define DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_NULL (1 << 2)
+#define DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_DUMPABLE (1 << 3)
+#define DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_DEVICE_ATOMICS (1 << 4)
/** @flags: Bind flags */
__u32 flags;
--
2.42.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 8:57 [PATCH i-g-t 0/4] Tes update for atomics related uAPI changes Nirmoy Das
2024-04-12 8:57 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-04-12 8:57 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] lib/igt_gt: Add gem_engine_can_block_ggtt_binder Nirmoy Das
2024-04-12 8:57 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/4] drm-uapi/xe: Add query flag for dev atomics on SMEM Nirmoy Das
2024-04-12 8:57 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/4] tests/intel/gem_ctx_shared: Skip some test on MTL Nirmoy Das
2024-04-12 8:57 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/4] tests/intel/gem_ctx_schedule: " Nirmoy Das
2024-04-12 8:57 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/4] tests/intel/xe_exec_atomic: Use new vm bind flag Nirmoy Das
2024-04-12 8:57 ` [PATCH i-g-t 4/4] test/intel/xe_query: Print DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_SUPP_DEV_ATOMIC_ON_SMEM Nirmoy Das
2024-04-12 8:57 ` [PATCH i-g-t 4/4] tests/intel/gem_spin_batch: Skip some test on MTL Nirmoy Das
2024-04-12 9:13 ` [PATCH i-g-t 0/4] Tes update for atomics related uAPI changes Nirmoy Das
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-12 9:01 Nirmoy Das
2024-04-12 9:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] drm-uapi/xe: Add device atomics vm bind flags Nirmoy Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240412085744.21196-2-nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox