Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com, santhosh.reddy.guddati@intel.com,
	Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_vrr: Update LOBF test to reuse the existing logic
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:15:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240920094521.1222304-3-jeevan.b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240920094521.1222304-1-jeevan.b@intel.com>

Removed the test_lobf function and used test_basic instead to simplify
the code. Improved validation and error messages to make LOBF testing
more reliable.

v2: Fix typo and add aux-less alpm check.

Signed-off-by: Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Santhosh Reddy Guddati <santhosh.reddy.guddati@intel.com>
---
 tests/kms_vrr.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/kms_vrr.c b/tests/kms_vrr.c
index 36a22eebe..d5a6304c3 100644
--- a/tests/kms_vrr.c
+++ b/tests/kms_vrr.c
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ test_basic(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
 			     (range.max + 5), rate[0], result);
 	}
 
-	if (flags & ~(TEST_NEGATIVE | TEST_MAXMIN)) {
+	if (flags & ~(TEST_NEGATIVE | TEST_MAXMIN | TEST_LINK_OFF)) {
 		rate[0] = vtest_ns.rate_ns;
 		result = flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate, 1, data->duration_ns);
 		igt_assert_f(result > 75,
@@ -656,16 +656,24 @@ test_basic(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
 			     (range.min - 10), rate[0], result);
 	}
 
-	if (flags & TEST_MAXMIN) {
+	if (flags & (TEST_MAXMIN | TEST_LINK_OFF)) {
 		unsigned int range_min =
 			/* For Intel h/w tweak the min rate, as h/w will terminate the vblank at Vmax. */
 			is_intel_device(data->drm_fd) ? (range.min + 2) : range.min;
 		uint64_t maxmin_rates[] = {vtest_ns.max, rate_from_refresh(range_min)};
 
 		result = flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, maxmin_rates, 2, data->duration_ns);
-		igt_assert_f(result > 75,
-			     "Refresh rates (%u/%u Hz) %"PRIu64"ns/%"PRIu64"ns: Target VRR on threshold not reached, result was %u%%\n",
-			     range.max, range_min, maxmin_rates[0], maxmin_rates[1], result);
+
+		if (flags & TEST_LINK_OFF)
+			igt_assert_f(igt_get_i915_edp_lobf_status(data->drm_fd, output->name),
+				     "LOBF not enabled\n");
+		else
+			igt_assert_f(result > 75,
+				     "Refresh rates (%u/%u Hz) %"PRIu64"ns/%"PRIu64"ns: Target "
+				     "VRR on threshold not reached, result was %u%%\n",
+				     range.max, range_min, maxmin_rates[0], maxmin_rates[1],
+				     result);
+
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -792,31 +800,6 @@ test_seamless_virtual_rr_basic(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *outpu
 	}
 }
 
-/* FIXME: test_lobf : Lobf can be enabled when
- * (Set Context Latency + Guardband) > (First SDP Position + Wake Time)
- * one the depends patches are merged please fix this function.
- */
-
-static void
-test_lobf(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
-{
-	uint64_t rate[] = {0};
-
-	rate[0] = rate_from_refresh(data->switch_modes[HIGH_RR_MODE].vrefresh);
-	prepare_test(data, output, pipe);
-
-	igt_info("LOBF test execution on %s, PIPE %s with VRR range: (%u-%u) Hz\n",
-		 output->name, kmstest_pipe_name(pipe), data->range.min, data->range.max);
-
-	igt_output_override_mode(output, &data->switch_modes[HIGH_RR_MODE]);
-	flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate, 1, TEST_DURATION_NS);
-	igt_output_override_mode(output, &data->switch_modes[LOW_RR_MODE]);
-	rate[0] = rate_from_refresh(data->switch_modes[LOW_RR_MODE].vrefresh);
-	flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate, 1, NSECS_PER_SEC);
-	igt_assert_f(igt_get_i915_edp_lobf_status(data->drm_fd, output->name),
-		     "LOBF not enabled\n");
-}
-
 static void
 test_cmrr(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
 {
@@ -895,7 +878,8 @@ static bool output_constraint(data_t *data, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags
 		    psr_sink_support(data->drm_fd, data->debugfs_fd, PR_MODE, NULL))
 			psr_disable(data->drm_fd, data->debugfs_fd, NULL);
 
-		if (igt_get_i915_edp_lobf_status(data->drm_fd, output->name)) {
+		if (igt_get_i915_edp_lobf_status(data->drm_fd, output->name) &&
+		    igt_get_aux_less_alpm_status(data->drm_fd, output->name)) {
 			igt_info("%s: LOBF not supported.\n", igt_output_name(output));
 			return false;
 		}
@@ -1098,12 +1082,16 @@ igt_main_args("drs:", long_opts, help_str, opt_handler, &data)
 			run_vrr_test(&data, test_cmrr, TEST_CMRR);
 		}
 
+		/* FIXME: test_lobf : Lobf can be enabled when
+		 * (Set Context Latency + Guardband) > (First SDP Position + Wake Time)
+		 * one the depends patches are merged please fix this function.
+		 */
 		igt_describe("Test to validate the link-off between active frames in "
 			     "non-PSR operation.");
 		igt_subtest_with_dynamic("lobf") {
 			igt_require(intel_display_ver(intel_get_drm_devid(data.drm_fd)) >= 20);
 
-			run_vrr_test(&data, test_lobf, TEST_LINK_OFF);
+			run_vrr_test(&data, test_basic, TEST_LINK_OFF);
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-20  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-20  9:45 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] tests/kms_vrr: Update LOBF test to resuse the existing logic Jeevan B
2024-09-20  9:45 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/igt_kms: Added library functions for aux-less ALPM status Jeevan B
2024-10-21  5:58   ` B, Jeevan
2024-09-20  9:45 ` Jeevan B [this message]
2024-09-20 10:10 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for tests/kms_vrr: Update LOBF test to resuse the existing logic (rev2) Patchwork
2024-09-20 10:22 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-20 14:52 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240920094521.1222304-3-jeevan.b@intel.com \
    --to=jeevan.b@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com \
    --cc=santhosh.reddy.guddati@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox