From: Ravi Kumar Vodapalli <ravi.kumar.vodapalli@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com, matthew.d.roper@intel.com,
lucas.demarchi@intel.com, gustavo.sousa@intel.com,
clinton.a.taylor@intel.com, matthew.s.atwood@intel.com,
dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com, haridhar.kalvala@intel.com,
shekhar.chauhan@intel.com, umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com,
ashutosh.dixit@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] tests/intel/perf_pmu: Fix Test Assertion Failure for semaphore-busy test
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:39:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241126140913.4066558-1-ravi.kumar.vodapalli@intel.com> (raw)
The tolerance limit exceeds the threshold values sometimes for test
igt@perf_pmu@semaphore-busy, bump up the limits slightly.
Also print the log in readable format in percentage instead of nanosec.
Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Vodapalli <ravi.kumar.vodapalli@intel.com>
---
tests/intel/perf_pmu.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/intel/perf_pmu.c b/tests/intel/perf_pmu.c
index bfa2d501a..7f43354fd 100644
--- a/tests/intel/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/intel/perf_pmu.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@
IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test the i915 pmu perf interface");
-const double tolerance = 0.05f;
+const double tolerance = 0.1f;
const unsigned long batch_duration_ns = 500e6;
char *drpc;
@@ -287,10 +287,9 @@ static uint64_t pmu_read_multi(int fd, unsigned int num, uint64_t *val)
#define __assert_within_epsilon(x, ref, tol_up, tol_down, debug_data) \
igt_assert_f((double)(x) <= (1.0 + (tol_up)) * (double)(ref) && \
(double)(x) >= (1.0 - (tol_down)) * (double)(ref), \
- "'%s' != '%s' (%f not within +%.1f%%/-%.1f%% tolerance of %f)\n%s\n",\
- #x, #ref, (double)(x), \
- (tol_up) * 100.0, (tol_down) * 100.0, \
- (double)(ref), debug_data)
+ "%.3f%% is not within tolerance limits of +%.1f%%/-%.1f%%\n%s\n", \
+ (((double)((double)(x) - (double)(ref)) * 100.0) / (double)(ref)), \
+ (tol_up) * 100.0, (tol_down) * 100.0, debug_data)
#define assert_within_epsilon(x, ref, tolerance) \
__assert_within_epsilon(x, ref, tolerance, tolerance, no_debug_data)
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-26 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-26 14:09 Ravi Kumar Vodapalli [this message]
2024-11-26 15:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel/perf_pmu: Fix Test Assertion Failure for semaphore-busy test Patchwork
2024-11-26 15:40 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-26 17:16 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2024-11-26 21:39 ` [PATCH] " Matt Roper
2024-11-27 6:56 ` Vodapalli, Ravi Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241126140913.4066558-1-ravi.kumar.vodapalli@intel.com \
--to=ravi.kumar.vodapalli@intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com \
--cc=clinton.a.taylor@intel.com \
--cc=dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=haridhar.kalvala@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.s.atwood@intel.com \
--cc=shekhar.chauhan@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox