From: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Auld@freedesktop.org, Matthew <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V6 4/4] tests/xe/mmap: add tests for pci mem barrier
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 18:27:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241230125757.2581381-5-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241230125757.2581381-1-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
We want to make sure that mmap do direct mapping of physical
page at doorbell space and whole page is accessible in order
to use pci memory barrier effect effectively.
Following subtests are added,
./build/tests/xe_mmap --r pci-membarrier
./build/tests/xe_mmap --r pci-membarrier-parallel
./build/tests/xe_mmap --r pci-membarrier-bad-pagesize
./build/tests/xe_mmap --r pci-membarrier-bad-object
V6(MAuld):
- checking differnet cross client value is enough in parallel test
V5:
- Add pci-membarrier-parallel test
V3(MAuld):
- Check if pci memory barrier is supported
V2(MAuld)
- use do_ioctl and replace igt_subtest_f with igt_subtest
- Remove unused define
Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
---
tests/intel/xe_mmap.c | 190 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 190 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_mmap.c b/tests/intel/xe_mmap.c
index d818cc2f8..8e7095e48 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_mmap.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_mmap.c
@@ -64,6 +64,140 @@ test_mmap(int fd, uint32_t placement, uint32_t flags)
gem_close(fd, bo);
}
+#define PAGE_SIZE 4096
+
+/**
+ * SUBTEST: pci-membarrier
+ * Description: create pci memory barrier with write on defined mmap offset.
+ * Test category: functionality test
+ *
+ */
+static void test_pci_membarrier(int xe)
+{
+ uint64_t flags = MAP_SHARED;
+ unsigned int prot = PROT_WRITE;
+ uint32_t *ptr;
+ uint64_t size = PAGE_SIZE;
+ struct timespec tv;
+ struct drm_xe_gem_mmap_offset mmo = {
+ .handle = 0,
+ .flags = DRM_XE_MMAP_OFFSET_FLAG_PCI_BARRIER,
+ };
+
+ do_ioctl(xe, DRM_IOCTL_XE_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET, &mmo);
+ ptr = mmap(NULL, size, prot, flags, xe, mmo.offset);
+ igt_assert(ptr != MAP_FAILED);
+
+ /* Check whole page for any errors, also check as
+ * we should not read written values back
+ */
+ for (int i = 0; i < size / sizeof(*ptr); i++) {
+ /* It is expected unconfigured doorbell space
+ * will return read value 0xdeadbeef
+ */
+ igt_assert_eq_u32(READ_ONCE(ptr[i]), 0xdeadbeef);
+
+ igt_gettime(&tv);
+ ptr[i] = i;
+ if (READ_ONCE(ptr[i]) == i) {
+ while (READ_ONCE(ptr[i]) == i)
+ ;
+ igt_info("fd:%d value retained for %"PRId64"ns pos:%d\n",
+ xe, igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv), i);
+ }
+ igt_assert_neq(READ_ONCE(ptr[i]), i);
+ }
+
+ munmap(ptr, size);
+}
+
+/**
+ * SUBTEST: pci-membarrier-parallel
+ * Description: create parallel pci memory barrier with write on defined mmap offset.
+ * Test category: functionality test
+ *
+ */
+static void test_pci_membarrier_parallel(int xe, int child)
+{
+ unsigned int bad_ns, elapsed;
+ uint64_t flags = MAP_SHARED;
+ unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int prot = PROT_WRITE;
+ uint32_t *ptr;
+ uint64_t size = PAGE_SIZE;
+ struct drm_xe_gem_mmap_offset mmo = {
+ .handle = 0,
+ .flags = DRM_XE_MMAP_OFFSET_FLAG_PCI_BARRIER,
+ };
+ struct timespec total, bad;
+ int tpos = size / sizeof(*ptr);
+ int value;
+
+ do_ioctl(xe, DRM_IOCTL_XE_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET, &mmo);
+ ptr = mmap(NULL, size, prot, flags, xe, mmo.offset);
+ igt_assert(ptr != MAP_FAILED);
+
+ /* Check any random position up to 1K */
+ i = rand() % (size / sizeof(*ptr));
+ /* It is expected unconfigured doorbell space
+ * will return read value 0xdeadbeef
+ */
+ igt_assert_eq_u32(READ_ONCE(ptr[i]), 0xdeadbeef);
+
+ igt_until_timeout(5) {
+ /* Check clients should not be able to see each other */
+ if (child != -1)
+ value = tpos + 1;
+ else
+ value = tpos;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(ptr[tpos-1], value);
+ }
+ bad_ns = 0;
+ igt_gettime(&total);
+ igt_until_timeout(5) { /* XXX sync with parent loop! */
+ if (READ_ONCE(ptr[tpos-1]) == value) {
+ igt_gettime(&bad);
+ while (READ_ONCE(ptr[tpos-1]) == value)
+ ;
+ bad_ns += igt_nsec_elapsed(&bad);
+ }
+ }
+ elapsed = igt_nsec_elapsed(&total);
+ if (bad_ns) {
+ igt_info("Cross-client writes visible %.1f%% of the time.\n",
+ bad_ns * 100. / elapsed);
+ }
+ igt_assert(20 * bad_ns < elapsed); /* Arbitrary 5% threshold */
+ if (child != -1)
+ igt_assert_neq(READ_ONCE(ptr[tpos-1]), tpos);
+ else
+ igt_assert_neq(READ_ONCE(ptr[tpos-1]), tpos + 1);
+ igt_assert_eq_u32(READ_ONCE(ptr[tpos-1]), 0xdeadbeef);
+
+ munmap(ptr, size);
+}
+
+/**
+ * SUBTEST: pci-membarrier-bad-pagesize
+ * Description: Test mmap offset with bad pagesize for pci membarrier.
+ * Test category: negative test
+ *
+ */
+static void test_bad_pagesize_for_pcimem(int fd)
+{
+ uint32_t *map;
+ uint64_t page_size = PAGE_SIZE * 2;
+ struct drm_xe_gem_mmap_offset mmo = {
+ .handle = 0,
+ .flags = DRM_XE_MMAP_OFFSET_FLAG_PCI_BARRIER,
+ };
+
+ do_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET, &mmo);
+ map = mmap(NULL, page_size, PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, mmo.offset);
+ igt_assert(map == MAP_FAILED);
+}
+
/**
* SUBTEST: bad-flags
* Description: Test mmap offset with bad flags.
@@ -126,6 +260,25 @@ static void test_bad_object(int fd)
do_ioctl_err(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET, &mmo, ENOENT);
}
+/**
+ * SUBTEST: pci-membarrier-bad-object
+ * Description: Test mmap offset with bad object for pci mem barrier.
+ * Test category: negative test
+ *
+ */
+static void test_bad_object_for_pcimem(int fd)
+{
+ uint64_t size = xe_get_default_alignment(fd);
+ struct drm_xe_gem_mmap_offset mmo = {
+ .handle = xe_bo_create(fd, 0, size,
+ vram_if_possible(fd, 0),
+ DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM),
+ .flags = DRM_XE_MMAP_OFFSET_FLAG_PCI_BARRIER,
+ };
+
+ do_ioctl_err(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET, &mmo, EINVAL);
+}
+
static jmp_buf jmp;
__noreturn static void sigtrap(int sig)
@@ -260,6 +413,16 @@ static void test_cpu_caching(int fd)
assert_caching(fd, system_memory(fd), 0, DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WC + 1, true);
}
+static bool is_pci_membarrier_supported(int fd)
+{
+ struct drm_xe_gem_mmap_offset mmo = {
+ .handle = 0,
+ .flags = DRM_XE_MMAP_OFFSET_FLAG_PCI_BARRIER,
+ };
+
+ return (igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET, &mmo) == 0);
+}
+
igt_main
{
int fd;
@@ -278,6 +441,28 @@ igt_main
test_mmap(fd, vram_memory(fd, 0) | system_memory(fd),
DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM);
+ igt_subtest("pci-membarrier") {
+ igt_require(is_pci_membarrier_supported(fd));
+ test_pci_membarrier(fd);
+ }
+
+ igt_subtest("pci-membarrier-parallel") {
+ int xe = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
+
+ igt_require(is_pci_membarrier_supported(fd));
+ igt_fork(child, 1)
+ test_pci_membarrier_parallel(xe, child);
+ test_pci_membarrier_parallel(fd, -1);
+ igt_waitchildren();
+
+ close(xe);
+ }
+
+ igt_subtest("pci-membarrier-bad-pagesize") {
+ igt_require(is_pci_membarrier_supported(fd));
+ test_bad_pagesize_for_pcimem(fd);
+ }
+
igt_subtest("bad-flags")
test_bad_flags(fd);
@@ -287,6 +472,11 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("bad-object")
test_bad_object(fd);
+ igt_subtest("pci-membarrier-bad-object") {
+ igt_require(is_pci_membarrier_supported(fd));
+ test_bad_object_for_pcimem(fd);
+ }
+
igt_subtest("small-bar") {
igt_require(xe_visible_vram_size(fd, 0));
igt_require(xe_visible_vram_size(fd, 0) < xe_vram_size(fd, 0));
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-30 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-30 12:57 [PATCH V6 0/4] Add pci_membarrier test in xe_mmap Tejas Upadhyay
2024-12-30 12:57 ` [PATCH V6 1/4] lib/i915_drm_local: Remove macros added via merged kernel Tejas Upadhyay
2024-12-30 12:57 ` [PATCH V6 2/4] include/drm-uapi-experimental: Move i915_drm_local.h to drm-uapi-experimental Tejas Upadhyay
2024-12-30 12:57 ` [PATCH V6 3/4] include/intel_drm_local.h: Add DRM_XE_MMAP_OFFSET_FLAG_PCI_BARRIER Tejas Upadhyay
2024-12-30 12:57 ` Tejas Upadhyay [this message]
2025-01-06 10:49 ` [PATCH V6 4/4] tests/xe/mmap: add tests for pci mem barrier Matthew Auld
2024-12-30 13:02 ` ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for Add pci_membarrier test in xe_mmap (rev7) Patchwork
2024-12-30 13:28 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-12-30 14:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-12-30 19:58 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2024-12-30 21:30 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241230125757.2581381-5-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
--to=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
--cc=Auld@freedesktop.org \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox