From: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Marcin Bernatowicz" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>,
"Lukasz Laguna" <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>,
"Adam Miszczak" <adam.miszczak@linux.intel.com>,
"Jakub Kolakowski" <jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com>,
"Michał Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
"Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
"Narasimha C V" <narasimha.c.v@intel.com>,
"Piotr Piórkowski" <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>,
"Satyanarayana K V P" <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>,
"Tomasz Lis" <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr: Add flr-twice subtest
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 18:18:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250205171819.2485976-3-marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205171819.2485976-1-marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
Introduce the `flr-twice` subtest, which initiates FLR twice in parallel
on the same VF. This subtest covers a use case where two FLRs can occur
within a short time frame, such as when starting a QEMU VM with
a passed VF.
Example log showing the behavior:
[ 241.906514] vfio-pci 0000:00:02.1: resetting
[ 241.907123] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT1: PF: VF1 FLR
[ 241.907204] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: PF: VF1 FLR
[ 242.013441] vfio-pci 0000:00:02.1: reset done
[ 242.040918] vfio-pci 0000:00:02.1: resetting
[ 242.041794] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT1: PF: VF1 FLR
[ 242.041803] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm:pf_enter_vf_flr_wip [xe]] GT1: PF:
VF1 FLR is already in progress
[ 242.042207] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: PF: VF1 FLR
[ 242.042214] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm:pf_enter_vf_flr_wip [xe]] GT0: PF:
VF1 FLR is already in progress
[ 242.149432] vfio-pci 0000:00:02.1: reset done
Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
Cc: Adam Miszczak <adam.miszczak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jakub Kolakowski <jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com>
Cc: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michał Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Narasimha C V <narasimha.c.v@intel.com>
Cc: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
Cc: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
---
tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr.c b/tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr.c
index 3b42aa637..a98d6ce70 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr.c
@@ -41,6 +41,13 @@
* Run type: FULL
* Description:
* Executes FLR on all VFs simultaneously to validate correct behavior during parallel resets.
+ *
+ * SUBTEST: flr-twice
+ * Run type: FULL
+ * Description:
+ * Initiates FLR twice in parallel on the same VF to validate behavior
+ * when multiple resets occur within a short time frame, as seen in some
+ * real-world scenarios (e.g., when starting a QEMU VM with a passed VF).
*/
IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Xe tests for SR-IOV VF FLR (Functional Level Reset)");
@@ -449,6 +456,14 @@ static int execute_parallel_flr(int pf_fd, int num_vfs, struct subcheck *checks,
wait_flr_ms, 1);
}
+static int execute_parallel_flr_twice(int pf_fd, int num_vfs,
+ struct subcheck *checks, int num_checks,
+ const int wait_flr_ms)
+{
+ return execute_parallel_flr_(pf_fd, num_vfs, checks, num_checks,
+ wait_flr_ms, 2);
+}
+
#define GEN12_VF_CAP_REG 0x1901f8
#define GGTT_PTE_TEST_FIELD_MASK GENMASK_ULL(19, 12)
#define GGTT_PTE_ADDR_SHIFT 12
@@ -1073,6 +1088,11 @@ igt_main
clear_tests(pf_fd, total_vfs, execute_parallel_flr);
}
+ igt_describe("Initiate FLR twice in parallel on same VF.");
+ igt_subtest("flr-twice") {
+ clear_tests(pf_fd, 1, execute_parallel_flr_twice);
+ }
+
igt_fixture {
igt_sriov_disable_vfs(pf_fd);
/* abort to avoid execution of next tests with enabled VFs */
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 17:18 [PATCH v4 i-g-t 0/2] tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr: Add parallel FLR subtest for SR-IOV VFs Marcin Bernatowicz
2025-02-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 i-g-t 1/2] " Marcin Bernatowicz
2025-02-05 17:18 ` Marcin Bernatowicz [this message]
2025-02-05 18:56 ` ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr: Add parallel FLR subtest for SR-IOV VFs (rev4) Patchwork
2025-02-05 19:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-05 21:16 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-06 9:58 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2025-02-06 12:10 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-06 12:21 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-06 12:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-06 17:27 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250205171819.2485976-3-marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
--to=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=adam.miszczak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com \
--cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=narasimha.c.v@intel.com \
--cc=piotr.piorkowski@intel.com \
--cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
--cc=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox