From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB605C0219D for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7269F10E3F2; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="VV1bdXsq"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B8A710EA93 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:22:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1739452978; x=1770988978; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=WCsa03n/j86I6DC9zZhWIF1dc4BzepmXlvdJz4vdgyo=; b=VV1bdXsqPm0o6vMtLTHHn9GTjyvDw3mMMSxN9JTGPCDhbJkw1foOfwRg s4rfma5f16CicQCria91JIWG5/2Cem6uryJmvTGH4/nJ7ODfsJIgTvLlG 95PZQ94XaGnntEjqXSJ5O3LCAWl0VReRo+nGror2tI6uqMOkMunDgSgOn d1Ouh5ZWVkHkV1B+PR6kGBV/VPl/g7idWirvfmMdadCsqY1vXY0a4Qqck bQnhfi9hwKDqTxdxRGYac/K5PtI9QkngUD11f/Zu6iltbbYG8QXibDwLt IxOxCZhAfAjep0kVK9nRN3ZNAWnD7hldfOf2g0u6DTR+qihMI1azhsoCQ w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: eUofOS7NRYK8FvLCefMc4A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HhM4fiFeRJ+awSV8l9XIzA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11344"; a="27750377" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,282,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="27750377" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Feb 2025 05:22:58 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DIsHlkohSxqRnNca8FJJng== X-CSE-MsgGUID: hWoKy8TVTx+CvlikeAb3Rg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="136369904" Received: from dut2122ptlh.iind.intel.com (HELO linux-X299-AORUS-Gaming-3-Pro.iind.intel.com) ([10.223.34.115]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Feb 2025 05:22:56 -0800 From: Swati Sharma To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Swati Sharma Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel-ci: Add kms_sysfs_edid_timing to blocklist Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:58:02 +0530 Message-Id: <20250213132802.357921-1-swati2.sharma@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development mailing list for IGT GPU Tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" Add kms_sysfs_edid_timing to blocklist. Test was written with the idea that edid read shouldn't take an unreasonable amount of time. The timeout is an arbitrary value because it depends on when the display responds and, in some cases, especially when the display is coming back from sleep, it can take quite a while. This test has sporadic behavior across various platforms connected to different displays. Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma --- tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 10 ++++++++++ tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt index 1236b8280..9917bf46a 100644 --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt @@ -151,3 +151,13 @@ igt@kms_ccs@.*-4-tiled-xe2-ccs igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@plane-fbc-rte igt@kms_pm_dc@deep-pkgc igt@kms_vrr@cmrr + +############################################### +# Test was written with the idea that edid read shouldn't take an +# unreasonable amount of time. The timeout is an arbitrary value +# because it depends on when the display responds and, in some cases, +# especially when the display is coming back from sleep, it can take +# quite a while. This test has sporadic behavior across various +# platforms connected to different displays. +############################################### +igt@kms_sysfs_edid_timing diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt index 6964628f1..80ceba9a5 100644 --- a/tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt +++ b/tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt @@ -80,6 +80,15 @@ igt@kms_pm_rpm@cursor.* ################################################################## igt@kms_prime@.* ################################################################## +# KMS: Test was written with the idea that edid read shouldn't take an +# unreasonable amount of time. The timeout is an arbitrary value +# because it depends on when the display responds and, in some cases, +# especially when the display is coming back from sleep, it can take +# quite a while. This test has sporadic behavior across various +# platforms connected to different displays. +################################################################## +igt@kms_sysfs_edid_timing +################################################################## # KMS: Non-Intel tests ################################################################## igt@kms_cursor_legacy@modeset-atomic-cursor-hotspot -- 2.25.1