From: nishit.sharma@intel.com
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, nishit.sharma@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:04:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251113170456.635343-4-nishit.sharma@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251113170456.635343-1-nishit.sharma@intel.com>
From: Nishit Sharma <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
This test allocates a buffer in SVM, writes data to it from src GPU , and reads/verifies
the data from dst GPU. Optionally, the CPU also reads or modifies the buffer and both
GPUs verify the results, ensuring correct cross-GPU and CPU memory access in a
multi-GPU environment.
Signed-off-by: Nishit Sharma <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c | 373 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/meson.build | 1 +
2 files changed, 374 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c b/tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6614ea3d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,373 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+/*
+ * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
+ */
+
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+#include "drmtest.h"
+#include "igt.h"
+#include "igt_multigpu.h"
+
+#include "intel_blt.h"
+#include "intel_mocs.h"
+#include "intel_reg.h"
+
+#include "xe/xe_ioctl.h"
+#include "xe/xe_query.h"
+#include "xe/xe_util.h"
+
+/**
+ * TEST: Basic multi-gpu SVM testing
+ * Category: SVM
+ * Mega feature: Compute
+ * Sub-category: Compute tests
+ * Functionality: SVM p2p access, madvise and prefetch.
+ * Test category: functionality test
+ *
+ * SUBTEST: cross-gpu-mem-access
+ * Description:
+ * This test creates two malloced regions, places the destination
+ * region both remotely and locally and copies to it. Reads back to
+ * system memory and checks the result.
+ *
+ */
+
+#define MAX_XE_REGIONS 8
+#define MAX_XE_GPUS 8
+#define NUM_LOOPS 1
+#define BATCH_SIZE(_fd) ALIGN(SZ_8K, xe_get_default_alignment(_fd))
+#define BIND_SYNC_VAL 0x686868
+#define EXEC_SYNC_VAL 0x676767
+#define COPY_SIZE SZ_64M
+
+struct xe_svm_gpu_info {
+ bool supports_faults;
+ int vram_regions[MAX_XE_REGIONS];
+ unsigned int num_regions;
+ unsigned int va_bits;
+ int fd;
+};
+
+struct multigpu_ops_args {
+ bool prefetch_req;
+ bool op_mod;
+};
+
+typedef void (*gpu_pair_fn) (
+ struct xe_svm_gpu_info *src,
+ struct xe_svm_gpu_info *dst,
+ struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
+ void *extra_args
+);
+
+static void for_each_gpu_pair(int num_gpus,
+ struct xe_svm_gpu_info *gpus,
+ struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
+ gpu_pair_fn fn,
+ void *extra_args);
+
+static void gpu_mem_access_wrapper(struct xe_svm_gpu_info *src,
+ struct xe_svm_gpu_info *dst,
+ struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
+ void *extra_args);
+
+static void open_pagemaps(int fd, struct xe_svm_gpu_info *info);
+
+static void
+create_vm_and_queue(struct xe_svm_gpu_info *gpu, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
+ uint32_t *vm, uint32_t *exec_queue)
+{
+ *vm = xe_vm_create(gpu->fd,
+ DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE | DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE, 0);
+ *exec_queue = xe_exec_queue_create(gpu->fd, *vm, eci, 0);
+ xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(gpu->fd, *vm, 0, 0, 0, 1ull << gpu->va_bits,
+ DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR);
+}
+
+static void
+setup_sync(struct drm_xe_sync *sync, volatile uint64_t **sync_addr, uint64_t timeline_value)
+{
+ *sync_addr = malloc(sizeof(**sync_addr));
+ igt_assert(*sync_addr);
+ sync->flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL;
+ sync->type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE;
+ sync->addr = to_user_pointer((uint64_t *)*sync_addr);
+ sync->timeline_value = timeline_value;
+ **sync_addr = 0;
+}
+
+static void
+cleanup_vm_and_queue(struct xe_svm_gpu_info *gpu, uint32_t vm, uint32_t exec_queue)
+{
+ xe_vm_unbind_lr_sync(gpu->fd, vm, 0, 0, 1ull << gpu->va_bits);
+ xe_exec_queue_destroy(gpu->fd, exec_queue);
+ xe_vm_destroy(gpu->fd, vm);
+}
+
+static void xe_multigpu_madvise(int src_fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size,
+ uint64_t ext, uint32_t type, int dst_fd, uint16_t policy,
+ uint16_t instance, uint32_t exec_queue, int local_fd,
+ uint16_t local_vram)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+#define SYSTEM_MEMORY 0
+ if (src_fd != dst_fd) {
+ ret = xe_vm_madvise(src_fd, vm, addr, size, ext, type, dst_fd, policy, instance);
+ if (ret == -ENOLINK) {
+ igt_info("No fast interconnect between GPU0 and GPU1, falling back to local VRAM\n");
+ ret = xe_vm_madvise(src_fd, vm, addr, size, ext, type, local_fd,
+ policy, local_vram);
+ if (ret) {
+ igt_info("Local VRAM madvise failed, falling back to system memory\n");
+ ret = xe_vm_madvise(src_fd, vm, addr, size, ext, type,
+ SYSTEM_MEMORY, policy, SYSTEM_MEMORY);
+ igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
+ }
+ } else {
+ igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
+ }
+ } else {
+ ret = xe_vm_madvise(src_fd, vm, addr, size, ext, type, dst_fd, policy, instance);
+ igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
+
+ }
+
+}
+
+static void xe_multigpu_prefetch(int src_fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size,
+ struct drm_xe_sync *sync, volatile uint64_t *sync_addr,
+ uint32_t exec_queue, bool prefetch_req)
+{
+ if (prefetch_req) {
+ xe_vm_prefetch_async(src_fd, vm, 0, 0, addr, size, sync, 1,
+ DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC);
+ if (*sync_addr != sync->timeline_value)
+ xe_wait_ufence(src_fd, (uint64_t *)sync_addr, sync->timeline_value,
+ exec_queue, NSEC_PER_SEC * 10);
+ }
+ free((void *)sync_addr);
+}
+
+static void for_each_gpu_pair(int num_gpus, struct xe_svm_gpu_info *gpus,
+ struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
+ gpu_pair_fn fn, void *extra_args)
+{
+ for (int src = 0; src < num_gpus; src++) {
+ if(!gpus[src].supports_faults)
+ continue;
+
+ for (int dst = 0; dst < num_gpus; dst++) {
+ if (src == dst)
+ continue;
+ fn(&gpus[src], &gpus[dst], eci, extra_args);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void batch_init(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t src_addr,
+ uint64_t dst_addr, uint64_t copy_size,
+ uint32_t *bo, uint64_t *addr)
+{
+ uint32_t width = copy_size / 256;
+ uint32_t height = 1;
+ uint32_t batch_bo_size = BATCH_SIZE(fd);
+ uint32_t batch_bo;
+ uint64_t batch_addr;
+ void *batch;
+ uint32_t *cmd;
+ uint32_t mocs_index = intel_get_uc_mocs_index(fd);
+ int i = 0;
+
+ batch_bo = xe_bo_create(fd, vm, batch_bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, 0), 0);
+ batch = xe_bo_map(fd, batch_bo, batch_bo_size);
+ cmd = (uint32_t *) batch;
+ cmd[i++] = MEM_COPY_CMD | (1 << 19);
+ cmd[i++] = width - 1;
+ cmd[i++] = height - 1;
+ cmd[i++] = width - 1;
+ cmd[i++] = width - 1;
+ cmd[i++] = src_addr & ((1UL << 32) - 1);
+ cmd[i++] = src_addr >> 32;
+ cmd[i++] = dst_addr & ((1UL << 32) - 1);
+ cmd[i++] = dst_addr >> 32;
+ cmd[i++] = mocs_index << XE2_MEM_COPY_MOCS_SHIFT | mocs_index;
+ cmd[i++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
+ cmd[i++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
+
+ batch_addr = to_user_pointer(batch);
+ /* Punch a gap in the SVM map where we map the batch_bo */
+ xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd, vm, batch_bo, 0, batch_addr, batch_bo_size, 0);
+ *bo = batch_bo;
+ *addr = batch_addr;
+}
+
+static void batch_fini(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint32_t bo, uint64_t addr)
+{
+ /* Unmap the batch bo by re-instating the SVM binding. */
+ xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd, vm, 0, 0, addr, BATCH_SIZE(fd),
+ DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR);
+ gem_close(fd, bo);
+}
+
+
+static void open_pagemaps(int fd, struct xe_svm_gpu_info *info)
+{
+ unsigned int count = 0;
+ uint64_t regions = all_memory_regions(fd);
+ uint32_t region;
+
+ xe_for_each_mem_region(fd, regions, region) {
+ if (XE_IS_VRAM_MEMORY_REGION(fd, region)) {
+ struct drm_xe_mem_region *mem_region =
+ xe_mem_region(fd, 1ull << (region - 1));
+ igt_assert(count < MAX_XE_REGIONS);
+ info->vram_regions[count++] = mem_region->instance;
+ }
+ }
+
+ info->num_regions = count;
+}
+
+static int get_device_info(struct xe_svm_gpu_info gpus[], int num_gpus)
+{
+ int cnt;
+ int xe;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0, cnt = 0 && i < 128; cnt < num_gpus; i++) {
+ xe = __drm_open_driver_another(i, DRIVER_XE);
+ if (xe < 0)
+ break;
+
+ gpus[cnt].fd = xe;
+ cnt++;
+ }
+
+ return cnt;
+}
+
+static void
+copy_src_dst(struct xe_svm_gpu_info *gpu0,
+ struct xe_svm_gpu_info *gpu1,
+ struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
+ bool prefetch_req)
+{
+ uint32_t vm[1];
+ uint32_t exec_queue[2];
+ uint32_t batch_bo;
+ void *copy_src, *copy_dst;
+ uint64_t batch_addr;
+ struct drm_xe_sync sync = {};
+ volatile uint64_t *sync_addr;
+ int local_fd = gpu0->fd;
+ uint16_t local_vram = gpu0->vram_regions[0];
+
+ create_vm_and_queue(gpu0, eci, &vm[0], &exec_queue[0]);
+
+ /* Allocate source and destination buffers */
+ copy_src = aligned_alloc(xe_get_default_alignment(gpu0->fd), SZ_64M);
+ igt_assert(copy_src);
+ copy_dst = aligned_alloc(xe_get_default_alignment(gpu1->fd), SZ_64M);
+ igt_assert(copy_dst);
+
+ /*
+ * Initialize, map and bind the batch bo. Note that Xe doesn't seem to enjoy
+ * batch buffer memory accessed over PCIe p2p.
+ */
+ batch_init(gpu0->fd, vm[0], to_user_pointer(copy_src), to_user_pointer(copy_dst),
+ COPY_SIZE, &batch_bo, &batch_addr);
+
+ /* Fill the source with a pattern, clear the destination. */
+ memset(copy_src, 0x67, COPY_SIZE);
+ memset(copy_dst, 0x0, COPY_SIZE);
+
+ xe_multigpu_madvise(gpu0->fd, vm[0], to_user_pointer(copy_dst), COPY_SIZE,
+ 0, DRM_XE_MEM_RANGE_ATTR_PREFERRED_LOC,
+ gpu1->fd, 0, gpu1->vram_regions[0], exec_queue[0],
+ local_fd, local_vram);
+
+ setup_sync(&sync, &sync_addr, BIND_SYNC_VAL);
+ xe_multigpu_prefetch(gpu0->fd, vm[0], to_user_pointer(copy_dst), COPY_SIZE, &sync,
+ sync_addr, exec_queue[0], prefetch_req);
+
+ sync_addr = (void *)((char *)batch_addr + SZ_4K);
+ sync.addr = to_user_pointer((uint64_t *)sync_addr);
+ sync.timeline_value = EXEC_SYNC_VAL;
+ *sync_addr = 0;
+
+ /* Execute a GPU copy. */
+ xe_exec_sync(gpu0->fd, exec_queue[0], batch_addr, &sync, 1);
+ if (*sync_addr != EXEC_SYNC_VAL)
+ xe_wait_ufence(gpu0->fd, (uint64_t *)sync_addr, EXEC_SYNC_VAL, exec_queue[0],
+ NSEC_PER_SEC * 10);
+
+ igt_assert(memcmp(copy_src, copy_dst, COPY_SIZE) == 0);
+
+ free(copy_dst);
+ free(copy_src);
+ munmap((void *)batch_addr, BATCH_SIZE(gpu0->fd));
+ batch_fini(gpu0->fd, vm[0], batch_bo, batch_addr);
+ cleanup_vm_and_queue(gpu0, vm[0], exec_queue[0]);
+}
+
+static void
+gpu_mem_access_wrapper(struct xe_svm_gpu_info *src,
+ struct xe_svm_gpu_info *dst,
+ struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
+ void *extra_args)
+{
+ struct multigpu_ops_args *args = (struct multigpu_ops_args *)extra_args;
+ igt_assert(src);
+ igt_assert(dst);
+
+ copy_src_dst(src, dst, eci, args->prefetch_req);
+}
+
+igt_main
+{
+ struct xe_svm_gpu_info gpus[MAX_XE_GPUS];
+ struct xe_device *xe;
+ int gpu, gpu_cnt;
+
+ struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance eci = {
+ .engine_class = DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY,
+ };
+
+ igt_fixture {
+ gpu_cnt = get_device_info(gpus, ARRAY_SIZE(gpus));
+ igt_skip_on(gpu_cnt < 2);
+
+ for (gpu = 0; gpu < gpu_cnt; ++gpu) {
+ igt_assert(gpu < MAX_XE_GPUS);
+
+ open_pagemaps(gpus[gpu].fd, &gpus[gpu]);
+ /* NOTE! inverted return value. */
+ gpus[gpu].supports_faults = !xe_supports_faults(gpus[gpu].fd);
+ fprintf(stderr, "GPU %u has %u VRAM regions%s, and %s SVM VMs.\n",
+ gpu, gpus[gpu].num_regions,
+ gpus[gpu].num_regions != 1 ? "s" : "",
+ gpus[gpu].supports_faults ? "supports" : "doesn't support");
+
+ xe = xe_device_get(gpus[gpu].fd);
+ gpus[gpu].va_bits = xe->va_bits;
+ }
+ }
+
+ igt_describe("gpu-gpu write-read");
+ igt_subtest("cross-gpu-mem-access") {
+ struct multigpu_ops_args op_args;
+ op_args.prefetch_req = 1;
+ for_each_gpu_pair(gpu_cnt, gpus, &eci, gpu_mem_access_wrapper, &op_args);
+ op_args.prefetch_req = 0;
+ for_each_gpu_pair(gpu_cnt, gpus, &eci, gpu_mem_access_wrapper, &op_args);
+ }
+
+ igt_fixture {
+ int cnt;
+
+ for (cnt = 0; cnt < gpu_cnt; cnt++)
+ drm_close_driver(gpus[cnt].fd);
+ }
+}
diff --git a/tests/meson.build b/tests/meson.build
index 9736f2338..1209f84a4 100644
--- a/tests/meson.build
+++ b/tests/meson.build
@@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ intel_xe_progs = [
'xe_media_fill',
'xe_mmap',
'xe_module_load',
+ 'xe_multi_gpusvm',
'xe_noexec_ping_pong',
'xe_oa',
'xe_pat',
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-13 17:04 [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] Add SVM madvise feature for multi-GPU configurations nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 01/10] lib/xe: Add instance parameter to xe_vm_madvise and introduce lr_sync helpers nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 02/10] tests/intel/xe_exec_system_allocator: Add parameter in madvise call nishit.sharma
2025-11-18 13:25 ` Gurram, Pravalika
2025-11-13 17:04 ` nishit.sharma [this message]
2025-11-13 17:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 04/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU atomic operations nishit.sharma
2025-11-21 14:11 ` Gurram, Pravalika
2025-11-13 17:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 05/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU coherency test nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 06/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU performance test nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 07/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU fault handling test nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 08/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU simultaneous access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 09/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU conflicting madvise test nishit.sharma
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-13 17:16 [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] Madvise feature in SVM for Multi-GPU configs nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:16 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-18 13:36 ` Gurram, Pravalika
2025-11-19 13:00 ` Gurram, Pravalika
2025-11-13 17:15 [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] Madvise feature in SVM for Multi-GPU configs nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:15 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:09 [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] SVM madvise feature in multi-GPU config nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:09 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 16:49 [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] Madvise feature in SVM for Multi-GPU configs nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 16:49 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 16:32 [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] Madvise feature in SVM for Multi-GPU configs nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-17 13:00 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-17 15:49 ` Sharma, Nishit
2025-11-17 20:40 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-18 9:24 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-04 15:31 [PATCH i-g-t v2 0/7] Madvise feature in SVM for Multi-GPU configs nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:00 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] " Nishit Sharma
2025-11-13 17:00 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test Nishit Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251113170456.635343-4-nishit.sharma@intel.com \
--to=nishit.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).