[PATCH i-g-t] xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run

[PATCH i-g-t] xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run

[Matt Roper]

The xe_exec_balancer tests require two engines of the same class to be
able to execute.  Many Intel platforms today do not have two engines of
any class so the test bails out and does not do anything, however it
returns a 'pass' result in this case which is misleading since the test
was unable to exercise the relevant kernel/hardware functionality.
Adjust the subtests to track whether they found engines capable of
performing the testing; if not, return a 'skip' result that more
accurately reflects that nothing was tested.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c | 178 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c
index 98e09961e..9cd641b4e 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
  *	of a class simultaneously
  * Test category: functionality test
  */
-static void test_all_active(int fd, int gt, int class)
+static bool test_all_active(int fd, int gt, int class)
 {
 	uint32_t vm;
 	uint64_t addr = 0x1a0000;
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void test_all_active(int fd, int gt, int class)
 
 	num_placements = xe_gt_fill_engines_by_class(fd, gt, class, eci);
 	if (num_placements < 2)
-		return;
+		return false;
 
 	vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
 	bo_size = sizeof(*data) * num_placements;
@@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ static void test_all_active(int fd, int gt, int class)
 	munmap(data, bo_size);
 	gem_close(fd, bo);
 	xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
+
+	return true;
 }
 
 #define MAX_N_EXEC_QUEUES	16
@@ -156,7 +158,7 @@ static void test_all_active(int fd, int gt, int class)
  * @parallel-userptr-invalidate:	parallel userptr invalidate
  * @parallel-userptr-invalidate-race:	parallel userptr invalidate racy
  */
-static void
+static bool
 test_exec(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
 	  unsigned int flags)
 {
@@ -186,7 +188,7 @@ test_exec(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
 
 	num_placements = xe_gt_fill_engines_by_class(fd, gt, class, eci);
 	if (num_placements < 2)
-		return;
+		return false;
 
 	vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
 	bo_size = sizeof(*data) * n_execs;
@@ -326,6 +328,8 @@ test_exec(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
 		free(data);
 	}
 	xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
+
+	return true;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -365,7 +369,7 @@ test_exec(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
  * @parallel-userptr-invalidate-race:	parallel userptr invalidate racy
  */
 
-static void
+static bool
 test_cm(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
 	unsigned int flags)
 {
@@ -399,7 +403,7 @@ test_cm(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
 
 	num_placements = xe_gt_fill_engines_by_class(fd, gt, class, eci);
 	if (num_placements < 2)
-		return;
+		return false;
 
 	vm = xe_vm_create(fd, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE, 0);
 	bo_size = sizeof(*data) * n_execs;
@@ -557,6 +561,8 @@ test_cm(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
 		free(data);
 	}
 	xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
+
+	return true;
 }
 
 
@@ -591,76 +597,140 @@ int igt_main()
 	igt_fixture()
 		fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
 
-	igt_subtest("virtual-all-active")
-		xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
+	igt_subtest("virtual-all-active") {
+		bool has_necessary_engines = false;
+
+		xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
 			xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
-				test_all_active(fd, gt, class);
+				has_necessary_engines |=
+					test_all_active(fd, gt, class);
+		}
+		igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
+	}
 
 	for (const struct section *s = sections; s->name; s++) {
-		igt_subtest_f("once-%s", s->name)
-			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
+		igt_subtest_f("once-%s", s->name) {
+			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
+
+			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
 				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
-					test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1, 1,
-						  s->flags);
+					has_necessary_engines |=
+						test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1, 1, s->flags);
+			}
+			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
+		}
+
+		igt_subtest_f("twice-%s", s->name) {
+			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
 
-		igt_subtest_f("twice-%s", s->name)
-			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
+			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
 				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
-					test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1, 2,
-						  s->flags);
+					has_necessary_engines |=
+						test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1, 2, s->flags);
+			}
+			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
+		}
+
+		igt_subtest_f("many-%s", s->name) {
+			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
 
-		igt_subtest_f("many-%s", s->name)
-			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
+			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
 				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
-					test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1,
-						  s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
-						  64 : 1024,
-						  s->flags);
+					has_necessary_engines |=
+						test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1,
+							  s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
+							  64 : 1024,
+							  s->flags);
+			}
+			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
+		}
 
-		igt_subtest_f("many-execqueues-%s", s->name)
-			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
+		igt_subtest_f("many-execqueues-%s", s->name) {
+			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
+
+			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
 				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
-					test_exec(fd, gt, class, 16,
-						  s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
-						  64 : 1024,
-						  s->flags);
+					has_necessary_engines |=
+						test_exec(fd, gt, class, 16,
+							  s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
+							  64 : 1024,
+							  s->flags);
+			}
+			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
+		}
+
+		igt_subtest_f("no-exec-%s", s->name) {
+			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
 
-		igt_subtest_f("no-exec-%s", s->name)
-			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
+			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
 				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
-					test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1, 0,
-						  s->flags);
+					has_necessary_engines |=
+						test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1, 0,
+							  s->flags);
+			}
+			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
+		}
 
-		igt_subtest_f("once-cm-%s", s->name)
-			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
+		igt_subtest_f("once-cm-%s", s->name) {
+			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
+
+			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
 				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
-					test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1, 1, s->flags);
+					has_necessary_engines |=
+						test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1, 1, s->flags);
+			}
+			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
+		}
+
+		igt_subtest_f("twice-cm-%s", s->name) {
+			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
 
-		igt_subtest_f("twice-cm-%s", s->name)
-			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
+			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
 				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
-					test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1, 2, s->flags);
+					has_necessary_engines |=
+						test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1, 2, s->flags);
+			}
+			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
+		}
+
+		igt_subtest_f("many-cm-%s", s->name) {
+			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
 
-		igt_subtest_f("many-cm-%s", s->name)
-			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
+			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
 				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
-					test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1,
-						s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
-						64 : 1024,
-						s->flags);
+					has_necessary_engines |=
+						test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1,
+							s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
+							64 : 1024,
+							s->flags);
+			}
+			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
+		}
 
-		igt_subtest_f("many-execqueues-cm-%s", s->name)
-			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
+		igt_subtest_f("many-execqueues-cm-%s", s->name) {
+			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
+
+			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
 				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
-					test_cm(fd, gt, class, 16,
-						s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
-						64 : 1024,
-						s->flags);
+					has_necessary_engines |=
+						test_cm(fd, gt, class, 16,
+							s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
+							64 : 1024,
+							s->flags);
+			}
+			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
+		}
+
+		igt_subtest_f("no-exec-cm-%s", s->name) {
+			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
 
-		igt_subtest_f("no-exec-cm-%s", s->name)
-			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
+			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
 				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
-					test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1, 0, s->flags);
+					has_necessary_engines |=
+						test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1, 0, s->flags);
+			}
+			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
+		}
 	}
 
 	igt_fixture()
-- 
2.53.0

✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure for xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run

[Patchwork]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1687 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/162088/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_8769_BAT -> XEIGTPW_14611_BAT
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_14611_BAT absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in XEIGTPW_14611_BAT, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Participating hosts (13 -> 14)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): bat-bmg-3 

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_14611_BAT:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@xe_multigpu_svm@mgpu-xgpu-access-basic:
    - bat-bmg-3:          NOTRUN -> [ABORT][1]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/bat-bmg-3/igt@xe_multigpu_svm@mgpu-xgpu-access-basic.html

  


Build changes
-------------

  * IGT: IGT_8769 -> IGTPW_14611
  * Linux: xe-4607-189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b -> xe-4609-4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe

  IGTPW_14611: 14611
  IGT_8769: 8769
  xe-4607-189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b: 189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b
  xe-4609-4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe: 4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2282 bytes --]

✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run

[Patchwork]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4143 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/162088/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_8769 -> IGTPW_14611
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_14611 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in IGTPW_14611, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/index.html

Participating hosts (43 -> 40)
------------------------------

  Missing    (3): bat-dg2-13 fi-snb-2520m bat-adls-6 

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_14611:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines:
    - bat-dg2-9:          [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8769/bat-dg2-9/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-dg2-9/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines.html

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines@lmem0:
    - bat-dg2-8:          [PASS][3] -> [ABORT][4] +1 other test abort
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8769/bat-dg2-8/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines@lmem0.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-dg2-8/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines@lmem0.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in IGTPW_14611 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live:
    - bat-mtlp-8:         [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6] ([i915#12061]) +1 other test dmesg-fail
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8769/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds:
    - bat-atsm-1:         NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][7] ([i915#12061]) +1 other test dmesg-fail
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-atsm-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html
    - bat-arls-6:         [PASS][8] -> [DMESG-FAIL][9] ([i915#12061]) +1 other test dmesg-fail
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8769/bat-arls-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-arls-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines:
    - bat-atsm-1:         [ABORT][10] -> [PASS][11] +1 other test pass
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8769/bat-atsm-1/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines.html
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-atsm-1/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds:
    - bat-dg2-14:         [DMESG-FAIL][12] ([i915#12061]) -> [PASS][13] +1 other test pass
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8769/bat-dg2-14/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-dg2-14/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html

  
  [i915#12061]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/12061


Build changes
-------------

  * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
  * IGT: IGT_8769 -> IGTPW_14611
  * Linux: CI_DRM_18038 -> CI_DRM_18040

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_18038: 189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  CI_DRM_18040: 4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGTPW_14611: 14611
  IGT_8769: 8769

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5157 bytes --]

✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure for xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run

[Patchwork]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8382 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/162088/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_8769_FULL -> XEIGTPW_14611_FULL
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_14611_FULL absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in XEIGTPW_14611_FULL, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Participating hosts (2 -> 2)
------------------------------

  No changes in participating hosts

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_14611_FULL:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@xe_exec_balancer@once-parallel-basic:
    - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-4/igt@xe_exec_balancer@once-parallel-basic.html

  * igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@process-many-large-mmap-shared-remap:
    - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [ABORT][2] +23 other tests abort
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-4/igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@process-many-large-mmap-shared-remap.html

  * igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@twice-mmap-remap-ro-dontunmap:
    - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [ABORT][3] +23 other tests abort
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-9/igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@twice-mmap-remap-ro-dontunmap.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in XEIGTPW_14611_FULL that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@kms_ccs@bad-aux-stride-y-tiled-gen12-rc-ccs-cc:
    - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([Intel XE#2887])
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-1/igt@kms_ccs@bad-aux-stride-y-tiled-gen12-rc-ccs-cc.html
    - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([Intel XE#2887])
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-3/igt@kms_ccs@bad-aux-stride-y-tiled-gen12-rc-ccs-cc.html

  * igt@kms_content_protection@dp-mst-type-0-suspend-resume:
    - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][6] ([Intel XE#6974])
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-8/igt@kms_content_protection@dp-mst-type-0-suspend-resume.html
    - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([Intel XE#6974])
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-6/igt@kms_content_protection@dp-mst-type-0-suspend-resume.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-modesetfrombusy:
    - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][8] ([Intel XE#4141])
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-1/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-modesetfrombusy.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-blt:
    - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([Intel XE#656]) +1 other test skip
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-blt.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-scndscrn-cur-indfb-draw-blt:
    - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][10] ([Intel XE#2313]) +2 other tests skip
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-scndscrn-cur-indfb-draw-blt.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-tiling-y:
    - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([Intel XE#1469])
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-4/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-tiling-y.html
    - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][12] ([Intel XE#2352])
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-tiling-y.html

  * igt@xe_configfs@survivability-mode:
    - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][13] ([Intel XE#6010] / [Intel XE#7317])
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-7/igt@xe_configfs@survivability-mode.html

  * igt@xe_eudebug_online@pagefault-read-stress:
    - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([Intel XE#6665])
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-1/igt@xe_eudebug_online@pagefault-read-stress.html
    - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][15] ([Intel XE#6665] / [Intel XE#6681])
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-9/igt@xe_eudebug_online@pagefault-read-stress.html

  * igt@xe_evict@evict-beng-threads-small-multi-vm:
    - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][16] ([Intel XE#6540] / [Intel XE#688])
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-8/igt@xe_evict@evict-beng-threads-small-multi-vm.html

  * igt@xe_exec_basic@multigpu-no-exec-userptr-invalidate:
    - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][17] ([Intel XE#1392]) +1 other test skip
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-1/igt@xe_exec_basic@multigpu-no-exec-userptr-invalidate.html
    - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][18] ([Intel XE#2322]) +1 other test skip
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-9/igt@xe_exec_basic@multigpu-no-exec-userptr-invalidate.html

  * igt@xe_exec_fault_mode@once-multi-queue-imm:
    - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][19] ([Intel XE#7136]) +1 other test skip
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-7/igt@xe_exec_fault_mode@once-multi-queue-imm.html
    - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][20] ([Intel XE#7136]) +1 other test skip
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-4/igt@xe_exec_fault_mode@once-multi-queue-imm.html

  * igt@xe_exec_multi_queue@few-execs-preempt-mode-close-fd-smem:
    - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][21] ([Intel XE#6874]) +1 other test skip
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-1/igt@xe_exec_multi_queue@few-execs-preempt-mode-close-fd-smem.html

  * igt@xe_exec_multi_queue@many-queues-preempt-mode-fault-priority:
    - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][22] ([Intel XE#6874]) +1 other test skip
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-2/igt@xe_exec_multi_queue@many-queues-preempt-mode-fault-priority.html

  
  [Intel XE#1392]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/1392
  [Intel XE#1469]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/1469
  [Intel XE#2313]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/2313
  [Intel XE#2322]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/2322
  [Intel XE#2352]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/2352
  [Intel XE#2887]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/2887
  [Intel XE#4141]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/4141
  [Intel XE#6010]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/6010
  [Intel XE#6540]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/6540
  [Intel XE#656]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/656
  [Intel XE#6665]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/6665
  [Intel XE#6681]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/6681
  [Intel XE#6874]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/6874
  [Intel XE#688]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/688
  [Intel XE#6974]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/6974
  [Intel XE#7136]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/7136
  [Intel XE#7317]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/7317


Build changes
-------------

  * IGT: IGT_8769 -> IGTPW_14611
  * Linux: xe-4607-189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b -> xe-4609-4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe

  IGTPW_14611: 14611
  IGT_8769: 8769
  xe-4607-189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b: 189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b
  xe-4609-4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe: 4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9700 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH i-g-t] xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run

[Kamil Konieczny]

Hi Matt,
On 2026-02-24 at 13:16:13 -0800, Matt Roper wrote:

please use prefix in subject:

[PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run

This could be done at merge as it is LGTM
Reviewed-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>

Regards,
Kamil

PS. please also reply to Xe FULL fail with one skip from this.

> The xe_exec_balancer tests require two engines of the same class to be
> able to execute.  Many Intel platforms today do not have two engines of
> any class so the test bails out and does not do anything, however it
> returns a 'pass' result in this case which is misleading since the test
> was unable to exercise the relevant kernel/hardware functionality.
> Adjust the subtests to track whether they found engines capable of
> performing the testing; if not, return a 'skip' result that more
> accurately reflects that nothing was tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c | 178 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c
> index 98e09961e..9cd641b4e 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
>   *	of a class simultaneously
>   * Test category: functionality test
>   */
> -static void test_all_active(int fd, int gt, int class)
> +static bool test_all_active(int fd, int gt, int class)
>  {
>  	uint32_t vm;
>  	uint64_t addr = 0x1a0000;
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void test_all_active(int fd, int gt, int class)
>  
>  	num_placements = xe_gt_fill_engines_by_class(fd, gt, class, eci);
>  	if (num_placements < 2)
> -		return;
> +		return false;
>  
>  	vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
>  	bo_size = sizeof(*data) * num_placements;
> @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ static void test_all_active(int fd, int gt, int class)
>  	munmap(data, bo_size);
>  	gem_close(fd, bo);
>  	xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
> +
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  #define MAX_N_EXEC_QUEUES	16
> @@ -156,7 +158,7 @@ static void test_all_active(int fd, int gt, int class)
>   * @parallel-userptr-invalidate:	parallel userptr invalidate
>   * @parallel-userptr-invalidate-race:	parallel userptr invalidate racy
>   */
> -static void
> +static bool
>  test_exec(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
>  	  unsigned int flags)
>  {
> @@ -186,7 +188,7 @@ test_exec(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
>  
>  	num_placements = xe_gt_fill_engines_by_class(fd, gt, class, eci);
>  	if (num_placements < 2)
> -		return;
> +		return false;
>  
>  	vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
>  	bo_size = sizeof(*data) * n_execs;
> @@ -326,6 +328,8 @@ test_exec(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
>  		free(data);
>  	}
>  	xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
> +
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -365,7 +369,7 @@ test_exec(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
>   * @parallel-userptr-invalidate-race:	parallel userptr invalidate racy
>   */
>  
> -static void
> +static bool
>  test_cm(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
>  	unsigned int flags)
>  {
> @@ -399,7 +403,7 @@ test_cm(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
>  
>  	num_placements = xe_gt_fill_engines_by_class(fd, gt, class, eci);
>  	if (num_placements < 2)
> -		return;
> +		return false;
>  
>  	vm = xe_vm_create(fd, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE, 0);
>  	bo_size = sizeof(*data) * n_execs;
> @@ -557,6 +561,8 @@ test_cm(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
>  		free(data);
>  	}
>  	xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
> +
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  
> @@ -591,76 +597,140 @@ int igt_main()
>  	igt_fixture()
>  		fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
>  
> -	igt_subtest("virtual-all-active")
> -		xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
> +	igt_subtest("virtual-all-active") {
> +		bool has_necessary_engines = false;
> +
> +		xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>  			xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
> -				test_all_active(fd, gt, class);
> +				has_necessary_engines |=
> +					test_all_active(fd, gt, class);
> +		}
> +		igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
> +	}
>  
>  	for (const struct section *s = sections; s->name; s++) {
> -		igt_subtest_f("once-%s", s->name)
> -			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
> +		igt_subtest_f("once-%s", s->name) {
> +			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
> +
> +			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>  				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
> -					test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1, 1,
> -						  s->flags);
> +					has_necessary_engines |=
> +						test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1, 1, s->flags);
> +			}
> +			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
> +		}
> +
> +		igt_subtest_f("twice-%s", s->name) {
> +			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
>  
> -		igt_subtest_f("twice-%s", s->name)
> -			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
> +			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>  				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
> -					test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1, 2,
> -						  s->flags);
> +					has_necessary_engines |=
> +						test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1, 2, s->flags);
> +			}
> +			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
> +		}
> +
> +		igt_subtest_f("many-%s", s->name) {
> +			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
>  
> -		igt_subtest_f("many-%s", s->name)
> -			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
> +			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>  				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
> -					test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1,
> -						  s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
> -						  64 : 1024,
> -						  s->flags);
> +					has_necessary_engines |=
> +						test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1,
> +							  s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
> +							  64 : 1024,
> +							  s->flags);
> +			}
> +			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
> +		}
>  
> -		igt_subtest_f("many-execqueues-%s", s->name)
> -			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
> +		igt_subtest_f("many-execqueues-%s", s->name) {
> +			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
> +
> +			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>  				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
> -					test_exec(fd, gt, class, 16,
> -						  s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
> -						  64 : 1024,
> -						  s->flags);
> +					has_necessary_engines |=
> +						test_exec(fd, gt, class, 16,
> +							  s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
> +							  64 : 1024,
> +							  s->flags);
> +			}
> +			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
> +		}
> +
> +		igt_subtest_f("no-exec-%s", s->name) {
> +			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
>  
> -		igt_subtest_f("no-exec-%s", s->name)
> -			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
> +			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>  				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
> -					test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1, 0,
> -						  s->flags);
> +					has_necessary_engines |=
> +						test_exec(fd, gt, class, 1, 0,
> +							  s->flags);
> +			}
> +			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
> +		}
>  
> -		igt_subtest_f("once-cm-%s", s->name)
> -			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
> +		igt_subtest_f("once-cm-%s", s->name) {
> +			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
> +
> +			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>  				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
> -					test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1, 1, s->flags);
> +					has_necessary_engines |=
> +						test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1, 1, s->flags);
> +			}
> +			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
> +		}
> +
> +		igt_subtest_f("twice-cm-%s", s->name) {
> +			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
>  
> -		igt_subtest_f("twice-cm-%s", s->name)
> -			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
> +			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>  				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
> -					test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1, 2, s->flags);
> +					has_necessary_engines |=
> +						test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1, 2, s->flags);
> +			}
> +			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
> +		}
> +
> +		igt_subtest_f("many-cm-%s", s->name) {
> +			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
>  
> -		igt_subtest_f("many-cm-%s", s->name)
> -			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
> +			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>  				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
> -					test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1,
> -						s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
> -						64 : 1024,
> -						s->flags);
> +					has_necessary_engines |=
> +						test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1,
> +							s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
> +							64 : 1024,
> +							s->flags);
> +			}
> +			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
> +		}
>  
> -		igt_subtest_f("many-execqueues-cm-%s", s->name)
> -			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
> +		igt_subtest_f("many-execqueues-cm-%s", s->name) {
> +			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
> +
> +			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>  				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
> -					test_cm(fd, gt, class, 16,
> -						s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
> -						64 : 1024,
> -						s->flags);
> +					has_necessary_engines |=
> +						test_cm(fd, gt, class, 16,
> +							s->flags & (REBIND | INVALIDATE) ?
> +							64 : 1024,
> +							s->flags);
> +			}
> +			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
> +		}
> +
> +		igt_subtest_f("no-exec-cm-%s", s->name) {
> +			bool has_necessary_engines = false;
>  
> -		igt_subtest_f("no-exec-cm-%s", s->name)
> -			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
> +			xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>  				xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
> -					test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1, 0, s->flags);
> +					has_necessary_engines |=
> +						test_cm(fd, gt, class, 1, 0, s->flags);
> +			}
> +			igt_require(has_necessary_engines);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	igt_fixture()
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 

Re: ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure for xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run

[Matt Roper]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 01:00:02AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/162088/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_8769_BAT -> XEIGTPW_14611_BAT
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_14611_BAT absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in XEIGTPW_14611_BAT, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   
> 
> Participating hosts (13 -> 14)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   Additional (1): bat-bmg-3 
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_14611_BAT:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt@xe_multigpu_svm@mgpu-xgpu-access-basic:
>     - bat-bmg-3:          NOTRUN -> [ABORT][1]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/bat-bmg-3/igt@xe_multigpu_svm@mgpu-xgpu-access-basic.html

Known issue https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/7414
(it can appear on multiple tests, not just the compute-square test the
ticket there indicates).


Matt

> 
>   
> 
> 
> Build changes
> -------------
> 
>   * IGT: IGT_8769 -> IGTPW_14611
>   * Linux: xe-4607-189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b -> xe-4609-4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe
> 
>   IGTPW_14611: 14611
>   IGT_8769: 8769
>   xe-4607-189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b: 189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b
>   xe-4609-4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe: 4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe
> 
> == Logs ==
> 
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/index.html

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation

Re: ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run

[Matt Roper]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 01:30:03AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/162088/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_8769 -> IGTPW_14611
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_14611 absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in IGTPW_14611, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/index.html
> 
> Participating hosts (43 -> 40)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   Missing    (3): bat-dg2-13 fi-snb-2520m bat-adls-6 
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_14611:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines:
>     - bat-dg2-9:          [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8769/bat-dg2-9/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines.html
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-dg2-9/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines@lmem0:
>     - bat-dg2-8:          [PASS][3] -> [ABORT][4] +1 other test abort
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8769/bat-dg2-8/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines@lmem0.html
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-dg2-8/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines@lmem0.html

Known issue https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/15759


Matt

> 
>   
> Known issues
> ------------
> 
>   Here are the changes found in IGTPW_14611 that come from known issues:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Issues hit ####
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live:
>     - bat-mtlp-8:         [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6] ([i915#12061]) +1 other test dmesg-fail
>    [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8769/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
>    [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds:
>     - bat-atsm-1:         NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][7] ([i915#12061]) +1 other test dmesg-fail
>    [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-atsm-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html
>     - bat-arls-6:         [PASS][8] -> [DMESG-FAIL][9] ([i915#12061]) +1 other test dmesg-fail
>    [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8769/bat-arls-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html
>    [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-arls-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html
> 
>   
> #### Possible fixes ####
> 
>   * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines:
>     - bat-atsm-1:         [ABORT][10] -> [PASS][11] +1 other test pass
>    [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8769/bat-atsm-1/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines.html
>    [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-atsm-1/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines.html
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds:
>     - bat-dg2-14:         [DMESG-FAIL][12] ([i915#12061]) -> [PASS][13] +1 other test pass
>    [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8769/bat-dg2-14/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html
>    [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/bat-dg2-14/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html
> 
>   
>   [i915#12061]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/12061
> 
> 
> Build changes
> -------------
> 
>   * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
>   * IGT: IGT_8769 -> IGTPW_14611
>   * Linux: CI_DRM_18038 -> CI_DRM_18040
> 
>   CI-20190529: 20190529
>   CI_DRM_18038: 189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
>   CI_DRM_18040: 4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
>   IGTPW_14611: 14611
>   IGT_8769: 8769
> 
> == Logs ==
> 
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_14611/index.html

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation

Re: ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure for xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run

[Matt Roper]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 08:53:20AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: xe_exec_balancer: Report skip when test is unable to run
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/162088/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_8769_FULL -> XEIGTPW_14611_FULL
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_14611_FULL absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in XEIGTPW_14611_FULL, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   
> 
> Participating hosts (2 -> 2)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   No changes in participating hosts
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_14611_FULL:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt@xe_exec_balancer@once-parallel-basic:
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-4/igt@xe_exec_balancer@once-parallel-basic.html

Intended skip (cases like this are why the change was made).

> 
>   * igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@process-many-large-mmap-shared-remap:
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [ABORT][2] +23 other tests abort
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-4/igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@process-many-large-mmap-shared-remap.html

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/7414

> 
>   * igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@twice-mmap-remap-ro-dontunmap:
>     - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [ABORT][3] +23 other tests abort
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-9/igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@twice-mmap-remap-ro-dontunmap.html

Also https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/7414


Patch title updated and pushed to master.  Thanks Kamil for the review.


Matt

> 
>   
> Known issues
> ------------
> 
>   Here are the changes found in XEIGTPW_14611_FULL that come from known issues:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Issues hit ####
> 
>   * igt@kms_ccs@bad-aux-stride-y-tiled-gen12-rc-ccs-cc:
>     - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([Intel XE#2887])
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-1/igt@kms_ccs@bad-aux-stride-y-tiled-gen12-rc-ccs-cc.html
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([Intel XE#2887])
>    [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-3/igt@kms_ccs@bad-aux-stride-y-tiled-gen12-rc-ccs-cc.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_content_protection@dp-mst-type-0-suspend-resume:
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][6] ([Intel XE#6974])
>    [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-8/igt@kms_content_protection@dp-mst-type-0-suspend-resume.html
>     - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([Intel XE#6974])
>    [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-6/igt@kms_content_protection@dp-mst-type-0-suspend-resume.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-modesetfrombusy:
>     - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][8] ([Intel XE#4141])
>    [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-1/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-modesetfrombusy.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-blt:
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([Intel XE#656]) +1 other test skip
>    [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-blt.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-scndscrn-cur-indfb-draw-blt:
>     - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][10] ([Intel XE#2313]) +2 other tests skip
>    [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-scndscrn-cur-indfb-draw-blt.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-tiling-y:
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([Intel XE#1469])
>    [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-4/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-tiling-y.html
>     - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][12] ([Intel XE#2352])
>    [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-tiling-y.html
> 
>   * igt@xe_configfs@survivability-mode:
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][13] ([Intel XE#6010] / [Intel XE#7317])
>    [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-7/igt@xe_configfs@survivability-mode.html
> 
>   * igt@xe_eudebug_online@pagefault-read-stress:
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([Intel XE#6665])
>    [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-1/igt@xe_eudebug_online@pagefault-read-stress.html
>     - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][15] ([Intel XE#6665] / [Intel XE#6681])
>    [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-9/igt@xe_eudebug_online@pagefault-read-stress.html
> 
>   * igt@xe_evict@evict-beng-threads-small-multi-vm:
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][16] ([Intel XE#6540] / [Intel XE#688])
>    [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-8/igt@xe_evict@evict-beng-threads-small-multi-vm.html
> 
>   * igt@xe_exec_basic@multigpu-no-exec-userptr-invalidate:
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][17] ([Intel XE#1392]) +1 other test skip
>    [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-1/igt@xe_exec_basic@multigpu-no-exec-userptr-invalidate.html
>     - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][18] ([Intel XE#2322]) +1 other test skip
>    [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-9/igt@xe_exec_basic@multigpu-no-exec-userptr-invalidate.html
> 
>   * igt@xe_exec_fault_mode@once-multi-queue-imm:
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][19] ([Intel XE#7136]) +1 other test skip
>    [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-7/igt@xe_exec_fault_mode@once-multi-queue-imm.html
>     - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][20] ([Intel XE#7136]) +1 other test skip
>    [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-4/igt@xe_exec_fault_mode@once-multi-queue-imm.html
> 
>   * igt@xe_exec_multi_queue@few-execs-preempt-mode-close-fd-smem:
>     - shard-bmg:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][21] ([Intel XE#6874]) +1 other test skip
>    [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-bmg-1/igt@xe_exec_multi_queue@few-execs-preempt-mode-close-fd-smem.html
> 
>   * igt@xe_exec_multi_queue@many-queues-preempt-mode-fault-priority:
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][22] ([Intel XE#6874]) +1 other test skip
>    [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/shard-lnl-2/igt@xe_exec_multi_queue@many-queues-preempt-mode-fault-priority.html
> 
>   
>   [Intel XE#1392]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/1392
>   [Intel XE#1469]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/1469
>   [Intel XE#2313]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/2313
>   [Intel XE#2322]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/2322
>   [Intel XE#2352]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/2352
>   [Intel XE#2887]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/2887
>   [Intel XE#4141]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/4141
>   [Intel XE#6010]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/6010
>   [Intel XE#6540]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/6540
>   [Intel XE#656]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/656
>   [Intel XE#6665]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/6665
>   [Intel XE#6681]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/6681
>   [Intel XE#6874]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/6874
>   [Intel XE#688]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/688
>   [Intel XE#6974]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/6974
>   [Intel XE#7136]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/7136
>   [Intel XE#7317]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/7317
> 
> 
> Build changes
> -------------
> 
>   * IGT: IGT_8769 -> IGTPW_14611
>   * Linux: xe-4607-189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b -> xe-4609-4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe
> 
>   IGTPW_14611: 14611
>   IGT_8769: 8769
>   xe-4607-189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b: 189174b3312588d97dc467dca7cfb9dce42ab81b
>   xe-4609-4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe: 4caa4c7d4ff7bd4d24bca8e795773e460eb8bbfe
> 
> == Logs ==
> 
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_14611/index.html

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation