public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sanjay Yadav <sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.auld@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] lib/intel_pat: Handle platforms without compressed PAT index
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 12:28:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260316065843.287818-2-sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com> (raw)

Previously intel_get_pat_idx_uc_comp() would silently return zero on
platforms where no compressed PAT index exists (e.g. CRI),
since uc_comp was zero-initialized by default. This could lead to
incorrect behavior when callers assume the returned index is valid.

Fix this by:
- Adding XE_PAT_IDX_INVALID sentinel to detect unsupported platforms
- Initializing uc_comp to XE_PAT_IDX_INVALID in xe_get_pat_sw_config()
  before parsing debugfs; only platforms whose kernel exposes
  IDX[XE_CACHE_NONE_COMPRESSION] in gt0/pat_sw_config will override it
  with a valid index
- Adding igt_assert(HAS_FLATCCS()) and igt_assert_f() in
  intel_get_pat_idx_uc_comp() to fail with a clear error instead of
  returning an invalid index

Also update the bo-comp-disable-bind test to distinguish between "CCS
is disabled" and "CCS does not exist" using HAS_FLATCCS(). On platforms
without CCS, the compressed PAT bind check is skipped since there is no
valid compressed PAT index to test with.

v2:
- Rebase
- Update commit message accordingly

Suggested-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Yadav <sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
---
 lib/intel_pat.c      |  5 +++++
 lib/intel_pat.h      |  1 +
 tests/intel/xe_pat.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/intel_pat.c b/lib/intel_pat.c
index 9feeeb39d..525d9ad24 100644
--- a/lib/intel_pat.c
+++ b/lib/intel_pat.c
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ int32_t xe_get_pat_sw_config(int drm_fd, struct intel_pat_cache *xe_pat_cache)
 	}
 
 	memset(xe_pat_cache, 0, sizeof(*xe_pat_cache));
+	xe_pat_cache->uc_comp = XE_PAT_IDX_INVALID;
+
 	while ((nread = getline(&line, &line_len, dbgfs_file)) != -1) {
 		uint32_t value = 0;
 		char *p = NULL;
@@ -159,8 +161,11 @@ uint8_t intel_get_pat_idx_uc_comp(int fd)
 	uint16_t dev_id = intel_get_drm_devid(fd);
 
 	igt_assert(intel_gen(dev_id) >= 20);
+	igt_assert(HAS_FLATCCS(dev_id));
 
 	intel_get_pat_idx(fd, &pat);
+	igt_assert_f(pat.uc_comp != XE_PAT_IDX_INVALID,
+		     "No compressed PAT index available on this platform\n");
 	return pat.uc_comp;
 }
 
diff --git a/lib/intel_pat.h b/lib/intel_pat.h
index e9ade2e2e..e5dd8a0af 100644
--- a/lib/intel_pat.h
+++ b/lib/intel_pat.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <stdint.h>
 
 #define DEFAULT_PAT_INDEX ((uint8_t)-1) /* igt-core can pick 1way or better */
+#define XE_PAT_IDX_INVALID ((uint8_t)-2) /* no such PAT index on this platform */
 #define XE_PAT_MAX_ENTRIES 32
 
 struct xe_pat_entry {
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pat.c b/tests/intel/xe_pat.c
index b92512164..e91b037a5 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_pat.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_pat.c
@@ -934,15 +934,18 @@ static bool has_no_compression_hint(int fd)
  * Test category: functionality test
  * Description: Validates that binding a BO created with
  * the NO_COMPRESSION flag using a compressed PAT index fails
- * with -EINVAL on Xe2+ platforms.
+ * with -EINVAL on Xe2+ platforms. On platforms where CCS
+ * does not exist, the test verifies uncompressed access works.
  */
 
 static void bo_comp_disable_bind(int fd)
 {
 	size_t size = xe_get_default_alignment(fd);
-	uint8_t comp_pat_index, uncomp_pat_index;
-	bool supported;
+	uint16_t dev_id = intel_get_drm_devid(fd);
+	bool has_flatccs = HAS_FLATCCS(dev_id);
+	uint8_t uncomp_pat_index;
 	uint32_t vm, bo;
+	bool supported;
 	int ret;
 
 	supported = has_no_compression_hint(fd);
@@ -958,14 +961,25 @@ static void bo_comp_disable_bind(int fd)
 	igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
 	vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
 
-	comp_pat_index = intel_get_pat_idx_uc_comp(fd);
 	uncomp_pat_index = intel_get_pat_idx_uc(fd);
 
-	igt_assert_eq(__xe_vm_bind(fd, vm, 0, bo, 0, 0x100000,
-				   size, 0, 0, NULL, 0,
-				   0, comp_pat_index, 0),
-		      -EINVAL);
+	/*
+	 * On platforms with CCS, binding a NO_COMPRESSION BO with a
+	 * compressed PAT index must fail. On platforms without CCS,
+	 * there is no valid compressed PAT index, so skip this check.
+	 */
+	if (has_flatccs) {
+		uint8_t comp_pat_index = intel_get_pat_idx_uc_comp(fd);
+
+		igt_assert_eq(__xe_vm_bind(fd, vm, 0, bo, 0, 0x100000,
+					   size, 0, 0, NULL, 0,
+					   0, comp_pat_index, 0),
+			      -EINVAL);
+	} else {
+		igt_debug("Platform has no CCS, skipping compressed PAT bind check\n");
+	}
 
+	/* Uncompressed bind must always succeed */
 	igt_assert_eq(__xe_vm_bind(fd, vm, 0, bo, 0, 0x100000,
 				   size, 0, 0, NULL, 0,
 				   0, uncomp_pat_index, 0),
-- 
2.52.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-03-16  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-16  6:58 Sanjay Yadav [this message]
2026-03-16 11:45 ` [PATCH v2] lib/intel_pat: Handle platforms without compressed PAT index Matthew Auld
2026-03-16 22:18 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for lib/intel_pat: Handle platforms without compressed PAT index (rev2) Patchwork
2026-03-17  9:59 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-17 21:26 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-03-17 22:01 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260316065843.287818-2-sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com \
    --to=sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox