From: Xin Wang <x.wang@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Xin Wang <x.wang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] tests/intel: skip multi-LRC tests for engine classes that do not support it
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 18:40:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403014040.310758-6-x.wang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403014040.310758-1-x.wang@intel.com>
xe_engine_class_supports_multi_lrc() now queries the kernel-reported
capability via debugfs. Guard the balancer and multi-LRC codepaths in
xe_exec_balancer, xe_exec_reset, xe_exec_threads and xe_drm_fdinfo with
this check so that tests are skipped rather than failing on engine
classes whose hardware does not support multi-LRC submission.
Signed-off-by: Xin Wang <x.wang@intel.com>
---
tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c | 2 +-
tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c | 6 +++---
tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c | 2 +-
tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c b/tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c
index 411ca6ec4..3c113ed5d 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ utilization_multi(int fd, int gt, int class, unsigned int flags)
igt_assert(virtual ^ parallel);
num_placements = xe_gt_fill_engines_by_class(fd, gt, class, eci);
- if (num_placements < 2)
+ if (num_placements < 2 || !xe_engine_class_supports_multi_lrc(fd, class))
return;
igt_debug("Target class: %s\n", engine_map[class]);
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c
index 9cd641b4e..3c6ec45f1 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_balancer.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static bool test_all_active(int fd, int gt, int class)
int i, num_placements;
num_placements = xe_gt_fill_engines_by_class(fd, gt, class, eci);
- if (num_placements < 2)
+ if (num_placements < 2 || !xe_engine_class_supports_multi_lrc(fd, class))
return false;
vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ test_exec(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
igt_assert_lte(n_exec_queues, MAX_N_EXEC_QUEUES);
num_placements = xe_gt_fill_engines_by_class(fd, gt, class, eci);
- if (num_placements < 2)
+ if (num_placements < 2 || !xe_engine_class_supports_multi_lrc(fd, class))
return false;
vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ test_cm(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
igt_assert_lte(n_exec_queues, MAX_N_EXEC_QUEUES);
num_placements = xe_gt_fill_engines_by_class(fd, gt, class, eci);
- if (num_placements < 2)
+ if (num_placements < 2 || !xe_engine_class_supports_multi_lrc(fd, class))
return false;
vm = xe_vm_create(fd, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE, 0);
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
index 7aaee31dd..95191139d 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ test_balancer(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
num_placements = xe_gt_fill_engines_by_class(fd, gt, class, eci);
- if (num_placements < 2)
+ if (num_placements < 2 || !xe_engine_class_supports_multi_lrc(fd, class))
return;
vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c
index ab9565beb..7b8100c5b 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ test_balancer(int fd, int gt, uint32_t vm, uint64_t addr, uint64_t userptr,
num_placements = xe_gt_fill_engines_by_class(fd, gt, class, eci);
igt_assert_lt(1, num_placements);
+ igt_assert(xe_engine_class_supports_multi_lrc(fd, class));
bo_size = sizeof(*data) * n_execs;
bo_size = xe_bb_size(fd, bo_size);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-03 1:40 [PATCH 0/5] lib/xe: query engine class capabilities from debugfs info Xin Wang
2026-04-03 1:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] lib/xe: cache engine class masks " Xin Wang
2026-04-03 1:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] lib/xe: add xe_engine_class_supports_multi_lrc() Xin Wang
2026-04-03 1:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] lib/xe: use debugfs info to implement xe_engine_class_supports_multi_queue() Xin Wang
2026-04-03 1:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: fix expected error for parallel queue creation Xin Wang
2026-04-03 3:22 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-04-03 7:00 ` Wang, X
2026-04-03 1:40 ` Xin Wang [this message]
2026-04-03 2:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for lib/xe: query engine class capabilities from debugfs info Patchwork
2026-04-03 3:03 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-03 12:57 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-03 22:34 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260403014040.310758-6-x.wang@intel.com \
--to=x.wang@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox