From: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>,
Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>,
Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Provision VFs inside dynamic subtests
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 16:50:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261007145016.398008-1-marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006-xe_pmu-do-not-enable-vfs-in-unrelated-subtests-v2-1-38f204d54553@intel.com>
VF setup helpers can call igt_assert(), which is not allowed in the outer
igt_subtest_with_dynamic() scope. Set up VFs in the first dynamic case,
reuse them across engine cases, and clean up after the group. This keeps
VF setup out of unrelated subtests.
Assisted-by: Copilot:Claude-Opus-5
Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Cc: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>
---
tests/intel/xe_pmu.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c b/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
index d41ebba1f..4f27ec50b 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
@@ -117,6 +117,8 @@ static char xe_device[NAME_MAX];
static bool autoprobe;
static int total_exec_quantum;
static bool has_engine_active_ticks;
+static unsigned int num_functions;
+static bool vfs_setup_started;
#define test_each_engine(test, fd, hwe) \
igt_subtest_with_dynamic(test) \
@@ -999,6 +1001,7 @@ static unsigned int enable_and_provision_vfs(int fd)
num_vfs = total_vfs > 2 ? 2 : total_vfs;
/* Enable VF's */
+ vfs_setup_started = true;
igt_sriov_disable_driver_autoprobe(fd);
igt_sriov_enable_vfs(fd, num_vfs);
igt_require(igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(fd) == num_vfs);
@@ -1021,6 +1024,15 @@ static unsigned int enable_and_provision_vfs(int fd)
return num_vfs;
}
+static void ensure_vfs_enabled(int fd)
+{
+ if (num_functions)
+ return;
+
+ igt_require(!vfs_setup_started);
+ num_functions = enable_and_provision_vfs(fd) + 1;
+}
+
static void unprovision_and_disable_vfs(int fd)
{
int ret;
@@ -1039,6 +1051,16 @@ static void unprovision_and_disable_vfs(int fd)
igt_sriov_clear_exit_handler();
}
+static void cleanup_vfs_setup(int fd)
+{
+ if (!vfs_setup_started)
+ return;
+
+ unprovision_and_disable_vfs(fd);
+ vfs_setup_started = false;
+ num_functions = 0;
+}
+
static void stash_gt_freq(int fd, uint32_t **stash_min, uint32_t **stash_max)
{
int max_gt, gt;
@@ -1190,28 +1212,29 @@ int igt_main()
}
igt_subtest_group() {
- unsigned int num_fns;
-
- igt_fixture()
- num_fns = enable_and_provision_vfs(fd) + 1;
-
igt_describe("Validate engine activity on all functions");
- test_each_engine("all-fn-engine-activity-load", fd, eci)
- engine_activity_all_fn(fd, eci, num_fns);
+ test_each_engine("all-fn-engine-activity-load", fd, eci) {
+ ensure_vfs_enabled(fd);
+ engine_activity_all_fn(fd, eci, num_functions);
+ }
igt_describe("Validate per-function engine activity");
- test_each_engine("fn-engine-activity-load", fd, eci)
- for (int fn = 0; fn < num_fns; fn++)
- engine_activity_fn(fd, eci, fn, XE_SRIOV_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW);
+ test_each_engine("fn-engine-activity-load", fd, eci) {
+ ensure_vfs_enabled(fd);
+ for (int fn = 0; fn < num_functions; fn++)
+ engine_activity_fn(fd, eci, fn,
+ XE_SRIOV_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW);
+ }
igt_describe("Validate per-function engine activity when sched-if-idle is set");
test_each_engine("fn-engine-activity-sched-if-idle", fd, eci) {
- for (int fn = 0; fn < num_fns; fn++)
+ ensure_vfs_enabled(fd);
+ for (int fn = 0; fn < num_functions; fn++)
engine_activity_fn(fd, eci, fn, XE_SRIOV_SCHED_PRIORITY_NORMAL);
}
igt_fixture()
- unprovision_and_disable_vfs(fd);
+ cleanup_vfs_setup(fd);
}
igt_subtest_group() {
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 14:11 [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Do not enable VFs in unrelated subtests Gustavo Sousa
2026-10-06 14:23 ` Kamil Konieczny
2026-10-06 14:29 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-10-06 14:44 ` Kamil Konieczny
2026-10-06 16:05 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-10-06 15:39 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-10-06 15:48 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-06 20:57 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2026-10-06 21:44 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-10-07 9:39 ` [PATCH i-g-t v2] " Bernatowicz, Marcin
2026-10-07 12:46 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-10-07 14:50 ` Marcin Bernatowicz [this message]
2026-10-08 10:03 ` [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Provision VFs inside dynamic subtests Kamil Konieczny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261007145016.398008-1-marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
--to=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox