From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, mahesh.meena@intel.com
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [i-g-t 0/2] gem_exec_schedule: Report and check for timeslicing
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 13:38:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202ef9ea-8ecf-c843-af3d-84f3b3bc31cf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210524124806.241439-1-tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
Hi,
On 24/05/2021 13:48, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> lib/i915: Report timeslicing
> tests/gem_exec_schedule: Check for timeslicing as kernel explicitely
> reports timeslicing
This appears to depends on an un-merged i915 patch -
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/419787/?series=86841&rev=1 -
hence the CI failures (skips). You could resend that patch using the
Test-with: tag in the cover letter, pointing to this IGT series, and see
if it fixes the tests you expect it to?
Regards,
Tvrtko
>
> Tejas Upadhyay (2):
> lib/i915: Report scheduler caps for timeslicing
> i915/gem_exec_schedule: Check for timeslicing
>
> include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h | 1 +
> lib/i915/gem_scheduler.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> lib/i915/gem_scheduler.h | 1 +
> tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c | 17 ++++++-----------
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-25 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-24 12:48 [igt-dev] [i-g-t 0/2] gem_exec_schedule: Report and check for timeslicing Tejas Upadhyay
2021-05-24 12:48 ` [igt-dev] [i-g-t 1/2] lib/i915: Report scheduler caps " Tejas Upadhyay
2021-05-24 12:48 ` [igt-dev] [i-g-t 2/2] i915/gem_exec_schedule: Check " Tejas Upadhyay
2021-05-24 14:34 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for gem_exec_schedule: Report and check " Patchwork
2021-05-24 20:34 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-05-25 12:38 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-05-25 13:07 ` [igt-dev] [i-g-t 0/2] " Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-05-25 12:57 Tejas Upadhyay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202ef9ea-8ecf-c843-af3d-84f3b3bc31cf@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mahesh.meena@intel.com \
--cc=tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox