From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
To: "Zbigniew Kempczyński" <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_suspend: Free device list after *-without-i915 subtests
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:10:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21773235.EfDdHjke4D@jkrzyszt-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230213095139.c5gcznwdf4a5kpgo@zkempczy-mobl2>
On Monday, 13 February 2023 10:51:39 CET Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:33:21PM +0100, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > On Thursday, 9 February 2023 20:32:31 CET Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > If any of *-without-i915 subtests fails or skips for any reason, it may
> > > leave the i915 module unloaded while keeping our device list populated
> > > with initially collected data. In a follow up igt_fixture section we
then
> > > try to reopen the device. If the test has been executed with a device
> > > filter specified, an attempt to open the device finds a matching entry
> > > that belongs to the no longer existing device in that initially
collected
> > > device list, fails to stat() it, concludes that's because of the device
> > > having been already open, and returns an error.
> > >
> > > Fix this potentially confusing test result by freeing the potentially
> > > outdated device list before continuing with drm_open_driver().
> >
> > Freeing device list occurred not safe if device scan was not performed
before.
> > I can see 3 potential solutions:
> > 1) force device rescan instead of free before calling drm_open_driver(),
> > 2) teach igt_device_free() to return immediately if the device list has
not
> > been allocated,
> > 3) provide a has_device_list() helper for to be used if not sure before
> > calling igt_device_free().
> >
> > Any preferences?
>
> I would enforce rescan.
>
> BTW I wonder how it can happen if runner is executing each subtest
> in new process so you're starting from scratch and rescan should be
> executed automatically.
The scenario I'm trying to address is different: a subtest fails, leaving the
i915 module unloaded but the device list populated. Then, before the test
exist, open_drm_driver() called from a follow up igt_fixture section falsely
detects the (non-existent) device as already open and fails instead of
reloading the module.
While that late failure shouldn't affect results of the subtest, debug
messages triggered from that failed device_open_driver() can occur potentially
misleading to anyone watching CI results, then should be avoided if possible.
Thanks,
Janusz
>
> Is is the case you're running few tests from the console?
>
> --
> Zbigniew
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Janusz
> >
> > >
> > > While being at it, add a comment that explains why we call
> > > igt_device_scan() from __igt_device_card_match() but don't force device
> > > rescan, and emit a debug message if we fail in _is_already_opened() on
> > > unsuccessful device stat().
> > >
> > > Subtest basic-s3-without-i915: FAIL (9.572s)
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) drmtest-WARNING: card maching filter 0 is already
opened
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) drmtest-CRITICAL: Test abort in function
drm_open_driver, file ../lib/drmtest.c:639:
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) drmtest-CRITICAL: abort condition: fd < 0
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) drmtest-CRITICAL: Last errno: 2, No such file or
directory
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) drmtest-CRITICAL: No known gpu found for chipset
flags 0x1 (intel)
> > > Test i915_suspend failed.
> > > **** DEBUG ****
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) drmtest-DEBUG: Looking for devices to open using
filter 0: pci:vendor=intel,device=dg2
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) drmtest-DEBUG: Filter matched /dev/dri/card0 | /dev/
dri/renderD128
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) drmtest-WARNING: card maching filter 0 is already
opened
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) drmtest-CRITICAL: Test abort in function
drm_open_driver, file ../lib/drmtest.c:639:
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) drmtest-CRITICAL: abort condition: fd < 0
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) drmtest-CRITICAL: Last errno: 2, No such file or
directory
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) drmtest-CRITICAL: No known gpu found for chipset
flags 0x1 (intel)
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) igt_core-INFO: Stack trace:
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) igt_core-INFO: #0 ../lib/igt_core.c:2066
__igt_abort()
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) igt_core-INFO: #1 ../lib/drmtest.c:573
drm_open_driver()
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) igt_core-INFO: #2 ../tests/i915/i915_suspend.c:258
__igt_unique____real_main245()
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) igt_core-INFO: #3 ../tests/i915/i915_suspend.c:245
main()
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) igt_core-INFO: #4 ../sysdeps/nptl/
libc_start_call_main.h:58 __libc_start_call_main()
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) igt_core-INFO: #5 ../csu/libc-start.c:128
__libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34()
> > > (i915_suspend:9050) igt_core-INFO: #6 [_start+0x2a]
> > > **** END ****
> > >
> > > Fixes: f7aff600ab16 ("tests/i915/i915_suspend: Disable d3cold_allowed
for basic-s2idle-without-i915")
> > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > lib/drmtest.c | 2 +-
> > > lib/igt_device_scan.c | 4 ++++
> > > tests/i915/i915_suspend.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/drmtest.c b/lib/drmtest.c
> > > index 16e80bdfcf..8e2d1ac50b 100644
> > > --- a/lib/drmtest.c
> > > +++ b/lib/drmtest.c
> > > @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static bool _is_already_opened(const char *path, int
as_idx)
> > > * we cannot even stat the device, so it's of no use - let's claim
it's
> > > * already opened
> > > */
> > > - if (stat(path, &new) != 0)
> > > + if (igt_debug_on(stat(path, &new) != 0))
> > > return true;
> > >
> > > for (int i = 0; i < as_idx; ++i) {
> > > diff --git a/lib/igt_device_scan.c b/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> > > index 8b767eed20..ae69ed09f1 100644
> > > --- a/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> > > +++ b/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> > > @@ -1918,6 +1918,10 @@ static bool __igt_device_card_match(const char
*filter,
> > > return false;
> > > memset(card, 0, sizeof(*card));
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Scan devices in case the user hasn't yet,
> > > + * but leave a decision on forced rescan on the user side.
> > > + */
> > > igt_devices_scan(false);
> > >
> > > if (igt_device_filter_apply(filter) == false)
> > > diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_suspend.c b/tests/i915/i915_suspend.c
> > > index 815f1c8a2c..c68110476e 100644
> > > --- a/tests/i915/i915_suspend.c
> > > +++ b/tests/i915/i915_suspend.c
> > > @@ -253,8 +253,16 @@ igt_main
> > > igt_subtest("basic-s3-without-i915")
> > > test_suspend_without_i915(SUSPEND_STATE_S3);
> > >
> > > - igt_fixture
> > > + igt_fixture {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Since above tests may fail leaving the i915 module
unloaded,
> > > + * force refresh of device list before opening an i915
device
> > > + * by cleaning up the current device list, otherwise we
can fail
> > > + * if we have been called with a device filter
specified.
> > > + */
> > > + igt_devices_free();
> > > fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > igt_subtest("fence-restore-tiled2untiled") {
> > > gem_require_mappable_ggtt(fd);
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-13 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-09 19:32 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_suspend: Free device list after *-without-i915 subtests Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-02-09 21:03 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2023-02-10 14:02 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Kamil Konieczny
2023-02-10 14:21 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-02-10 16:28 ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-02-10 15:30 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
2023-02-10 21:33 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-02-13 9:51 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-02-13 10:10 ` Janusz Krzysztofik [this message]
2023-02-14 6:15 ` Petri Latvala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21773235.EfDdHjke4D@jkrzyszt-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox