From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: "Zbigniew Kempczyński" <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v4 5/5] tests/xe_pat: Verify PAT registers are properly programmed
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:04:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <264a31ab-ce70-4a95-b931-dfb57d20502e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330144032.1954771-12-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
On 30/03/2026 15:40, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> Debugfs exposes file which reflects current PAT registers settings.
> Verify these registers matches predefined PAT config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Is the suspend case not applicable for non-PTA?
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_pat.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pat.c b/tests/intel/xe_pat.c
> index a845541e6f..e2b6682449 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_pat.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_pat.c
> @@ -238,6 +238,50 @@ static void pat_sanity(int fd)
> }
> }
>
> +#define GT_RESET 1
> +/**
> + * SUBTEST: pat-sw-hw-compare
> + * Description: verify debugfs 'pat' reflects 'pat_sw_config'
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: pat-sw-hw-reset-compare
> + * Description: verify debugfs 'pat' reflects 'pat_sw_config' after gt reset
> + */
> +static void pat_sw_hw_compare(int fd, uint32_t flags)
> +{
> + bool matches = true;
> + int gt;
> +
> + xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
> + struct intel_pat_cache pat_hw_config = {};
> + struct intel_pat_cache pat_sw_config = {};
> + int hw_entries, sw_entries;
> +
> + if (flags & GT_RESET)
> + xe_force_gt_reset_sync(fd, gt);
> +
> + hw_entries = xe_get_pat_hw_config(fd, &pat_hw_config, gt);
> + sw_entries = xe_get_pat_sw_config(fd, &pat_sw_config, gt);
> + igt_assert_eq(hw_entries, sw_entries);
> +
> + igt_debug("[GT%d] hw_entries: %d, sw_entries: %d\n", gt, hw_entries, sw_entries);
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < hw_entries; i++) {
> + uint32_t hw_pat, sw_pat;
> +
> + hw_pat = pat_hw_config.entries[i].pat;
> + sw_pat = pat_sw_config.entries[i].pat;
> + if (hw_pat != sw_pat) {
> + igt_debug("[GT%d] Mismatch of pat register vs sw config "
> + "- index: %i, entries: %08x <> %08x\n",
> + gt, i, hw_pat, sw_pat);
> + matches = false;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + igt_assert_eq(matches, true);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * SUBTEST: pat-index-all
> * Test category: functionality test
> @@ -2204,6 +2248,12 @@ int igt_main_args("V", NULL, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
> igt_subtest("pat-sanity")
> pat_sanity(fd);
>
> + igt_subtest("pat-sw-hw-compare")
> + pat_sw_hw_compare(fd, 0);
> +
> + igt_subtest("pat-sw-hw-reset-compare")
> + pat_sw_hw_compare(fd, GT_RESET);
> +
> igt_subtest("pat-index-all")
> pat_index_all(fd);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 14:40 [PATCH i-g-t v4 0/5] Verify PTA entries contains expected values Zbigniew Kempczyński
2026-03-30 14:40 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 1/5] lib/intel_pat: Support other than gt0 during parsing debugfs PAT Zbigniew Kempczyński
2026-03-30 14:51 ` Matthew Auld
2026-03-30 14:40 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 2/5] lib/intel_pat: Expose getter of PAT registers Zbigniew Kempczyński
2026-03-30 14:55 ` Matthew Auld
2026-03-30 14:40 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 3/5] lib/intel_pat: Set PTA + ATS PAT entries to invalid value Zbigniew Kempczyński
2026-03-30 14:58 ` Matthew Auld
2026-03-30 14:40 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 4/5] tests/xe_pat: Verify PTA PAT entries contain expected values Zbigniew Kempczyński
2026-03-30 15:02 ` Matthew Auld
2026-03-30 14:40 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 5/5] tests/xe_pat: Verify PAT registers are properly programmed Zbigniew Kempczyński
2026-03-30 15:04 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2026-03-31 3:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Verify PTA entries contains expected values (rev4) Patchwork
2026-03-31 3:25 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-31 8:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-03-31 12:26 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-04-01 5:50 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=264a31ab-ce70-4a95-b931-dfb57d20502e@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox