From: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
To: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 1/4] igt/i915/i915_pm_lpsp enable pm_lpsp for platforms till Gen11.
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:50:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <312f575a-a401-5ad0-8aec-6fd176b77770@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1555421738-15223-2-git-send-email-anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Hi,
On 4/16/2019 7:05 PM, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> Enabling i915_pm_lpsp igt tests for all platforms till Gen11.
> Earlier these test were enabled only on haswell and broadwell
> platforms.
>
> Cc: imre.deak@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/i915_pm_lpsp.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_lpsp.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_lpsp.c
> index b319dbe..020f8b3 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_lpsp.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_lpsp.c
> @@ -30,18 +30,43 @@
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
>
> +#define HSW_PW_CTL_IDX_GLOBAL 15
> +#define SKL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_2 15
> +#define ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_3 2
> +
> +#define HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(pw_idx) (0x2 << ((pw_idx) * 2))
> +#define HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_STATE(pw_idx) (0x1 << ((pw_idx) * 2))
> +
> +int no_lpsp_pw_idx;
Please add a code-comment about the purpose of using global variable if
it is really needed.
>
> static bool supports_lpsp(uint32_t devid)
> {
> - return IS_HASWELL(devid) || IS_BROADWELL(devid);
> + return IS_HASWELL(devid) || IS_BROADWELL(devid)
> + || AT_LEAST_GEN(devid, 9);
> +}
> +
> +static bool get_no_lpsp_pw_idx(uint32_t devid)
This function return type is confusing to me.
> +{
> + if (IS_HASWELL(devid) || IS_BROADWELL(devid))
> + no_lpsp_pw_idx = HSW_PW_CTL_IDX_GLOBAL;
> + else if (IS_GEN(devid, 11))
> + no_lpsp_pw_idx = ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_3;
> + else if (AT_LEAST_GEN(devid, 9))
> + no_lpsp_pw_idx = SKL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_2;
> + else
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
This function is updating the power well index and also checking lpsp is
supported or not which is duplication of existing function supports_lpsp().
As per the above code "update" tag is more suitable than "get".
> }
>
> static bool lpsp_is_enabled(int drm_fd)
> {
> uint32_t val;
> + uint32_t mask = HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(no_lpsp_pw_idx) |
> + HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_STATE(no_lpsp_pw_idx);
get_no_lpsp_pw_idx() can be used here to get the power-well index and then use it to create the mask, then global variable can be avoided.
>
> val = INREG(HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL2);
> - return !(val & HSW_PWR_WELL_STATE_ENABLED);
> + return !((val & mask) == mask);
0 or non-zero should be the decision maker. Better not compare with
"mask" after masking,
> }
>
> /* The LPSP mode is all about an enabled pipe, but we expect to also be in the
> @@ -212,6 +237,7 @@ igt_main
>
> intel_register_access_init(intel_get_pci_device(), 0, drm_fd);
>
> + igt_require(get_no_lpsp_pw_idx(devid));
supports_lpsp() maybe appropriate here to check igt is required or not.
Regards,
Animesh
> kmstest_set_vt_graphics_mode();
> }
>
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-17 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-16 13:35 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 0/4] igt/i915/i915_pm_lpsp enable pm_lpsp for platforms till Gen11 v3 Anshuman Gupta
2019-04-16 13:35 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 1/4] igt/i915/i915_pm_lpsp enable pm_lpsp for platforms till Gen11 Anshuman Gupta
2019-04-17 6:20 ` Animesh Manna [this message]
2019-04-16 13:35 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 2/4] igt/i915/i915_pm_lpsp check lpsp relevance on non edp panel Anshuman Gupta
2019-04-16 13:35 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 3/4] igt/i915/i915_pm_lpsp skip edp-panel-fitter test Anshuman Gupta
2019-04-16 13:35 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 4/4] DO_NOT_MERGE add i915_pm_lpsp subtests to CI fast feedback list Anshuman Gupta
2019-04-16 14:17 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for igt/i915/i915_pm_lpsp enable pm_lpsp for platforms till Gen11 v3 Patchwork
2019-04-24 5:46 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2019-04-24 8:21 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=312f575a-a401-5ad0-8aec-6fd176b77770@intel.com \
--to=animesh.manna@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox