Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hajda, Andrzej" <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
To: Maciej Patelczyk <maciej.patelczyk@intel.com>,
	<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/xe_eudebug_online: correct calculate the time diff
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 09:26:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <318cf3d2-950b-4be4-b07b-cb5a2c5d6284@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250110153455.2791158-1-maciej.patelczyk@intel.com>


W dniu 10.01.2025 o 16:34, Maciej Patelczyk pisze:
> When calculating time difference between two timespec values use
> library function which does it right.
>
> Previous way wasn't working well on slower machines. It was only
> taking the tv_nsec field from struct timespec.
>
> Fixes: bbf1730baf ("tests/xe_eudebug_online: Debug client which
>                      runs workloads on EU")
> CC: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Patelczyk <maciej.patelczyk@intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c b/tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c
> index 052774a3b..f532387af 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c
> @@ -2235,6 +2235,11 @@ static int find_suitable_engines(struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance **hwes,
>   	return engine_count;
>   }
>   
> +static uint64_t timespecs_diff_us(struct timespec *ts1, struct timespec *ts2)
> +{
> +	return (uint64_t)(fabs(igt_time_elapsed(ts1, ts2)) * USEC_PER_SEC);


It seems igt_time_elapsed handles correctly case ts1 > ts2, so the 
conversion looks correct.

Something to bikeshed is the conversion from int type to double, then 
int again, up to you.

I think there is no need to explicit conversion to uint64_t, no big deal.

Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>

Regards
Andrzej


> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * SUBTEST: breakpoint-many-sessions-single-tile
>    * Description:
> @@ -2255,7 +2260,7 @@ static void test_many_sessions_on_tiles(int fd, bool multi_tile)
>   	struct online_debug_data **data;
>   	struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance **hwe;
>   	struct drm_xe_eudebug_event_eu_attention *eus;
> -	uint64_t current_t, next_t, diff;
> +	uint64_t diff;
>   	int attempt_mask = 0, final_mask, should_break;
>   	int i;
>   
> @@ -2318,10 +2323,8 @@ static void test_many_sessions_on_tiles(int fd, bool multi_tile)
>   	igt_assert_eq(attempt_mask, final_mask);
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < n - 1; i++) {
> -		/* Convert timestamps to microseconds */
> -		current_t = data[i]->exception_arrived.tv_nsec * 1000;
> -		next_t = data[i + 1]->exception_arrived.tv_nsec * 1000;
> -		diff = current_t < next_t ? next_t - current_t : current_t - next_t;
> +		diff = timespecs_diff_us(&data[i]->exception_arrived,
> +					 &data[i + 1]->exception_arrived);
>   
>   		if (multi_tile)
>   			igt_assert_f(diff < WORKLOAD_DELAY_US,

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-13  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-10 15:34 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/xe_eudebug_online: correct calculate the time diff Maciej Patelczyk
2025-01-10 18:20 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2025-01-10 18:23 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-01-13  8:26 ` Hajda, Andrzej [this message]
2025-01-13  8:47   ` [PATCH i-g-t] " Maciej Patelczyk
2025-01-14 20:48 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=318cf3d2-950b-4be4-b07b-cb5a2c5d6284@intel.com \
    --to=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maciej.patelczyk@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox