Re: ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for lib/igt_dir: Use actual length for string termination

[Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@linux.intel.com>]

Der I915,

On 8/9/2025 5:35 PM, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: lib/igt_dir: Use actual length for string termination
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/152724/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_8489_FULL -> XEIGTPW_13564_FULL
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_13564_FULL absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in XEIGTPW_13564_FULL, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   
> 
> Participating hosts (4 -> 3)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   Missing    (1): shard-adlp 
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_13564_FULL:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt@xe_ccs@suspend-resume:
>     - shard-bmg:          [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] +1 other test incomplete
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8489/shard-bmg-4/igt@xe_ccs@suspend-resume.html
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13564/shard-bmg-6/igt@xe_ccs@suspend-resume.html
> 
>   * igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@process-many-execqueues-new-bo-map-nomemset:
>     - shard-lnl:          [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +3 other tests fail
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8489/shard-lnl-7/igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@process-many-execqueues-new-bo-map-nomemset.html
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13564/shard-lnl-7/igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@process-many-execqueues-new-bo-map-nomemset.html
> 
>   * igt@xe_fault_injection@inject-fault-probe-function-xe_wa_init:
>     - shard-dg2-set2:     [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6]
>    [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8489/shard-dg2-436/igt@xe_fault_injection@inject-fault-probe-function-xe_wa_init.html
>    [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13564/shard-dg2-433/igt@xe_fault_injection@inject-fault-probe-function-xe_wa_init.html
>     - shard-bmg:          [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8]
>    [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8489/shard-bmg-1/igt@xe_fault_injection@inject-fault-probe-function-xe_wa_init.html
>    [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13564/shard-bmg-1/igt@xe_fault_injection@inject-fault-probe-function-xe_wa_init.html
> 
>   * igt@xe_fault_injection@probe-fail-guc-xe_guc_mmio_send_recv:
>     - shard-dg2-set2:     [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-WARN][10]
>    [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8489/shard-dg2-434/igt@xe_fault_injection@probe-fail-guc-xe_guc_mmio_send_recv.html
>    [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13564/shard-dg2-433/igt@xe_fault_injection@probe-fail-guc-xe_guc_mmio_send_recv.html
> 
>   * igt@xe_pm_residency@gt-c6-freeze:
>     - shard-dg2-set2:     [PASS][11] -> [TIMEOUT][12] +1 other test timeout
>    [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8489/shard-dg2-436/igt@xe_pm_residency@gt-c6-freeze.html
>    [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13564/shard-dg2-433/igt@xe_pm_residency@gt-c6-freeze.html
> 

These are unrelated. Thanks.

[...]