Re: ✗ CI.xeBAT: failure for igt-runner fact checking (rev5)

[Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@linux.intel.com>]

Dear I915,

On 09.11.2024 09:36, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: igt-runner fact checking (rev5)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/140841/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_8101_BAT -> XEIGTPW_12073_BAT
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_12073_BAT absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in XEIGTPW_12073_BAT, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   
> 
> Participating hosts (9 -> 9)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   No changes in participating hosts
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_12073_BAT:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind:
>     - bat-lnl-1:          [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8101/bat-lnl-1/igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind.html
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_12073/bat-lnl-1/igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind.html

These are unrelated to my change.

[...]

Thank you!