From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <34309cb8-d6e5-7842-52ad-369960440fb6@intel.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 15:47:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Vinay Belgaumkar , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20230606221418.296888-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> From: Andrzej Hajda In-Reply-To: <20230606221418.296888-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_ctx_persistence: Skip hang subtest with GuC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" List-ID: On 07.06.2023 00:14, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: > Hang subtest is not supported with GuC submission enabled > > Cc: Kamil Konieczny > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar Maybe providing more specific explanation would be better. Sth like: GuC does not support dynamically configurable options, particularly hangcheck disabling/enabling. This is at least what I understood from internal bug tracker. I wonder if it shouldn't be done also on driver level. Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda Regards Andrzej > --- > tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c > index df9b1c491..d2558354e 100644 > --- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c > @@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ static void test_nohangcheck_hang(int i915, const intel_ctx_cfg_t *cfg) > int testable_engines = 0; > int dir; > > + igt_require(!gem_using_guc_submission(i915)); > + > cleanup(i915); > > /*