From: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@linux.intel.com>
To: Pravalika Gurram <pravalika.gurram@intel.com>,
lucas.demarchi@intel.com, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Zbigniew Kempczyński" <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tests/xe_spin_batch: Add spin-timestamp-check
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:26:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34ba9bc5-9d1e-41b1-8eba-770da62e0eb5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241113175207.399101-3-pravalika.gurram@intel.com>
I did compile and test using igt-runner and the following test-list
with and without the two patches in this series. I found no issues.
igt@xe_drm_fdinfo
igt@xe_spin_batch
igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0-hflip-async-flip
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-onoff
igt@core_hotunplug@hotrebind
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-blt
igt@xe_prime_self_import@basic-with_one_bo
igt@xe_exec_basic@many-basic
igt@kms_mmap_write_crc@main
igt@kms_flip@2x-busy-flip
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@drrs-2p-scndscrn-spr-indfb-fullscreen
igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any
igt@xe_sysfs_scheduler@timeslice_duration_us-invalid
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-tiling-4
igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@64x64-left-edge
igt@xe_module_load@reload-no-display
On 13.11.2024 18:52, Pravalika Gurram wrote:
> check the ctx_timestamp register post gt reset for each engine.
>
> V2: move spinner code to lib avoid code redundancy
> use flags to maintain the readability
> use READ_ONCE to prevent compiler from optimizing it out [Lucas]
>
> V3: call allocator in run_spinner and pass to spinner ctx [Zbigniew]
> v4: Integrate spin_ctx to xe_cork [Lucas]
>
> Signed-off-by: Pravalika Gurram <pravalika.gurram@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
Tested-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c b/tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c
> index 9314e229e..9a5cdb830 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c
> @@ -309,6 +309,121 @@ static void xe_spin_fixed_duration(int fd, int gt, int class, int flags)
> put_ahnd(ahnd);
> }
>
> +static void exec_store(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> + bool hang)
> +{
> + uint64_t ahnd, bb_size, bb_addr;
> + uint32_t vm, exec_queue, bb;
> +#define USER_FENCE_VALUE 0xdeadbeefdeadbeefull
> + struct drm_xe_sync syncobj = {
> + .type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE,
> + .flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL,
> + .timeline_value = USER_FENCE_VALUE,
> + };
> +
> + struct drm_xe_exec exec = {
> + .num_batch_buffer = 1,
> + .num_syncs = 1,
> + .syncs = to_user_pointer(&syncobj),
> + };
> + struct {
> + uint32_t batch[16];
> + uint64_t pad;
> + uint32_t data;
> + uint64_t vm_sync;
> + uint64_t exec_sync;
> + } *data;
> + uint64_t batch_offset, batch_addr, sdi_offset, sdi_addr;
> + int64_t timeout = NSEC_PER_SEC;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + ahnd = intel_allocator_open(fd, 0, INTEL_ALLOCATOR_RELOC);
> +
> + vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
> + exec_queue = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, 0);
> + bb_size = xe_bb_size(fd, sizeof(*data));
> + bb = xe_bo_create(fd, vm, bb_size, vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id), 0);
> + bb_addr = intel_allocator_alloc_with_strategy(ahnd, bb, bb_size, 0,
> + ALLOC_STRATEGY_LOW_TO_HIGH);
> + data = xe_bo_map(fd, bb, bb_size);
> + syncobj.addr = to_user_pointer(&data->vm_sync);
> + xe_vm_bind_async(fd, vm, 0, bb, 0, bb_addr, bb_size, &syncobj, 1);
> + xe_wait_ufence(fd, &data->vm_sync, USER_FENCE_VALUE, 0, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +
> + batch_offset = (char *)&data->batch - (char *)data;
> + batch_addr = bb_addr + batch_offset;
> + sdi_offset = (char *)&data->data - (char *)data;
> + sdi_addr = bb_addr + sdi_offset;
> +
> + i = 0;
> +
> + data->batch[i++] = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
> + data->batch[i++] = sdi_addr;
> + data->batch[i++] = sdi_addr >> 32;
> + data->batch[i++] = 0;
> + if (!hang)
> + data->batch[i++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> + igt_assert(i <= ARRAY_SIZE(data->batch));
> +
> + syncobj.addr = bb_addr + (char *)&data->exec_sync - (char *)data;
> + exec.exec_queue_id = exec_queue;
> + exec.address = batch_addr;
> + xe_exec(fd, &exec);
> + ret = __xe_wait_ufence(fd, &data->exec_sync, USER_FENCE_VALUE, 0, &timeout);
> + igt_assert(hang ? ret < 0 : ret == 0);
> +
> + munmap(data, bb_size);
> + gem_close(fd, bb);
> +
> + xe_exec_queue_destroy(fd, exec_queue);
> + xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
> +
> + put_ahnd(ahnd);
> +}
> +
> +static void run_spinner(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci)
> +{
> + struct xe_cork *ctx = NULL;
> + uint32_t vm;
> + uint32_t ts_1, ts_2;
> + uint64_t ahnd;
> +
> + vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
> + ahnd = intel_allocator_open(fd, 0, INTEL_ALLOCATOR_RELOC);
> + ctx = xe_spin_ctx_init_opts(fd, eci, vm, 1, 1, .ahnd = ahnd);
> + xe_spin_sync_start(fd, ctx);
> +
> + /* Collect and check timestamps before stopping the spinner */
> + usleep(50000);
> + ts_1 = READ_ONCE(ctx->spin->timestamp);
> + usleep(50000);
> + ts_2 = READ_ONCE(ctx->spin->timestamp);
> + igt_assert_neq_u32(ts_1, ts_2);
> +
> + xe_spin_sync_end(fd, ctx);
> + xe_spin_ctx_destroy(fd, ctx);
> +
> + xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
> + put_ahnd(ahnd);
> +}
> +
> +#define TRUE 1
> +#define FALSE 0
> +/**
> + * SUBTEST: spin-timestamp-check
> + * Description: Intiate gt reset then check the timestamp register for each engine.
> + * Test category: functionality test
> + */
> +static void xe_spin_timestamp_check(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci)
> +{
> + /*sanity check for exec submission*/
> + exec_store(fd, eci, FALSE);
> +
> + exec_store(fd, eci, TRUE);
> +
> + run_spinner(fd, eci);
> +}
> +
> igt_main
> {
> struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
> @@ -343,6 +458,12 @@ igt_main
> xe_for_each_engine_class(class)
> xe_spin_fixed_duration(fd, gt, class, SPIN_FIX_DURATION_PREEMPT);
>
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("spin-timestamp-check")
> + xe_for_each_engine(fd, hwe) {
> + igt_dynamic_f("engine-%s", xe_engine_class_string(hwe->engine_class))
> + xe_spin_timestamp_check(fd, hwe);
> + }
> +
> igt_fixture
> drm_close_driver(fd);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-28 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-13 17:52 [PATCH 0/2] tests/xe_spin_batch: Add spin-timestamp-check Pravalika Gurram
2024-11-13 17:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] lib/xe/xe_spin: move the spinner related functions to lib Pravalika Gurram
2024-11-28 8:24 ` Peter Senna Tschudin
2024-12-04 9:09 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2024-11-13 17:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] tests/xe_spin_batch: Add spin-timestamp-check Pravalika Gurram
2024-11-28 8:26 ` Peter Senna Tschudin [this message]
2024-11-13 20:07 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/xe_spin_batch: Add spin-timestamp-check (rev4) Patchwork
2024-11-13 20:08 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 20:18 ` ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-13 23:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-14 6:49 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-11-08 7:44 [PATCH 0/2] tests/xe_spin_batch: Add spin-timestamp-check Pravalika Gurram
2024-11-08 7:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Pravalika Gurram
2024-11-07 14:33 [PATCH 0/2] " Pravalika Gurram
2024-11-07 14:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Pravalika Gurram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34ba9bc5-9d1e-41b1-8eba-770da62e0eb5@linux.intel.com \
--to=peter.senna@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=pravalika.gurram@intel.com \
--cc=zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox