From: "Modem, Bhanuprakash" <bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
To: <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>, <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/xe/xe_spin: Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe.
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:10:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <418709a6-ed1b-03c2-9b61-1e39a03a3fec@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230426201626.5361-1-sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
On Thu-27-04-2023 01:46 am, sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com wrote:
> From: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
>
> Extending the spin_create implementation and allocator handle support in xe,
> where it submits dummy work loads to engine. This Implementation is wrapped
> around vm_bind and unbind as we are supposed to do it manually for xe.
>
> Cc: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/xe/xe_spin.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/xe/xe_spin.h | 21 +++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_spin.c b/lib/xe/xe_spin.c
> index 856d0ba2..503d440e 100644
> --- a/lib/xe/xe_spin.c
> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_spin.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,73 @@ void xe_spin_end(struct xe_spin *spin)
> spin->end = 0;
> }
>
> +static xe_spin_t *
> +xe_spin_create(int fd, struct xe_spin_factory *opt)
> +{
> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci;
> + size_t bo_size = xe_get_default_alignment(fd);
> + uint32_t vm, bo, engine, syncobj;
> + uint64_t ahnd = opt->ahnd, addr;
> + struct xe_spin *spin;
> + struct drm_xe_sync sync = {
> + .flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_SYNCOBJ | DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL,
> + };
> + struct drm_xe_exec exec = {
> + .num_batch_buffer = 1,
> + .num_syncs = 1,
> + .syncs = to_user_pointer(&sync),
> + };
> +
> + spin = calloc(1, sizeof(struct xe_spin));
> + igt_assert(spin);
> +
> + vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
> + bo = xe_bo_create(fd, eci->gt_id, vm, bo_size);
> + spin = xe_bo_map(fd, bo, 0x1000);
> + engine = xe_engine_create(fd, vm, eci, 0);
> + syncobj = syncobj_create(fd, 0);
> +
> + if (ahnd)
In i915, ahnd is used for relocations which 0 for XE. Is this ahnd is
different than i915's?
> + addr = intel_allocator_alloc_with_strategy(ahnd, bo, bo_size, 0, ALLOC_STRATEGY_LOW_TO_HIGH);
> +
> + xe_vm_bind_sync(fd, vm, bo, 0, addr, bo_size);
> +
> + xe_spin_init(spin, addr, true);
> + exec.engine_id = engine;
> + exec.address = addr;
> + sync.handle = syncobj;
> + igt_assert_eq(igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC, &exec), 0);
> +
> + opt->bo = bo;
> + opt->vm = vm;
> + opt->engine = engine;
> + opt->spin = spin;
> + opt->syncobj = syncobj;
> +
> + return opt->spin;
> +
> +}
> +
> +xe_spin_t *
> +__xe_spin_factory(int fd, struct xe_spin_factory *opt)
> +{
> + return xe_spin_create(fd, opt);
> +}
> +
> +void xe_spin_sync_wait(int fd, struct xe_spin_factory *opt)
> +{
> + igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &opt->syncobj, 1, INT64_MAX, 0,
> + NULL));
> +}
> +
> +void xe_spin_free(int fd, struct xe_spin_factory *opt)
> +{
> + xe_spin_end(opt->spin);
> + xe_engine_destroy(fd, opt->engine);
> + xe_vm_destroy(fd, opt->vm);
> + gem_close(fd, opt->bo);
> +}
> +
> void xe_cork_init(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe,
> struct xe_cork *cork)
> {
> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_spin.h b/lib/xe/xe_spin.h
> index 73f9a026..124fdebe 100644
> --- a/lib/xe/xe_spin.h
> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_spin.h
> @@ -15,17 +15,34 @@
> #include "xe_query.h"
>
> /* Mapped GPU object */
> -struct xe_spin {
> +struct xe_spin_factory {
> + uint64_t ahnd;
> + uint32_t vm;
> + uint32_t bo;
> + uint32_t engine;
> + uint32_t syncobj;
> + struct xe_spin *spin;
> +};
> +
> +typedef struct xe_spin {
> uint32_t batch[16];
> uint64_t pad;
> uint32_t start;
> uint32_t end;
> -};
> +} xe_spin_t;
> +
> +xe_spin_t *
> +__xe_spin_factory(int fd, struct xe_spin_factory *opt);
> +
> +#define xe_spin_new(fd, ...) \
> + __xe_spin_factory(fd, &((xe_spin_factory *opt){__VA__ARGS}))
So from kms tests, we need to call this helper as below:
if (is_xe_device(fd))
xe_spin_new();
else
igt_spin_new();
I am expecting some helper as below, so that we can avoid code churn in
test level:
igt_spin_new() {
if (is_xe_device(fd))
xe_spin_new();
else
i915_spin_new();
}
- Bhanu
>
> void xe_spin_init(struct xe_spin *spin, uint64_t addr, bool preempt);
> bool xe_spin_started(struct xe_spin *spin);
> +void xe_spin_sync_wait(int fd, struct xe_spin_factory *opt);
> void xe_spin_wait_started(struct xe_spin *spin);
> void xe_spin_end(struct xe_spin *spin);
> +void xe_spin_free(int fd, struct xe_spin_factory *opt);
>
> struct xe_cork {
> struct xe_spin *spin;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-27 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-26 20:16 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/xe/xe_spin: Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-04-26 20:56 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for lib/xe/xe_spin: Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe. (rev2) Patchwork
2023-04-27 5:40 ` Modem, Bhanuprakash [this message]
2023-04-27 5:49 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/xe/xe_spin: Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe Ch, Sai Gowtham
2023-04-27 7:09 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-10 5:55 sai.gowtham.ch
2023-05-11 5:08 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-05-11 10:03 ` Ch, Sai Gowtham
2023-05-11 6:43 ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-05-11 10:02 ` Ch, Sai Gowtham
2023-05-11 10:04 ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-05-05 5:35 sai.gowtham.ch
2023-05-08 12:19 ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-05-08 12:22 ` Ch, Sai Gowtham
2023-05-08 19:55 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-05-09 6:36 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-06-08 14:10 ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-17 9:19 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-04-24 11:54 sai.gowtham.ch
2023-04-25 3:36 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-04-25 7:07 ` Ch, Sai Gowtham
2023-04-25 10:48 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=418709a6-ed1b-03c2-9b61-1e39a03a3fec@intel.com \
--to=bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com \
--cc=zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox