Re: [PATCH i-g-t, v4] tests/intel/xe_pm: Add tests for suspend without display

["Sundaresan, Sujaritha" <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>]

On 8/27/2024 6:24 PM, Gupta, Anshuman wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sousa, Gustavo <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 6:18 PM
>> To: De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>; Gupta, Anshuman
>> <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>; Sundaresan, Sujaritha
>> <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
>> Cc: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>; igt-dev@
>> <lists.freedesktop.org igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>; Piecielska, Katarzyna
>> <katarzyna.piecielska@intel.com>
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH i-g-t, v4] tests/intel/xe_pm: Add tests for suspend without
>> display
>>
>> Quoting Gupta, Anshuman (2024-08-27 06:29:06-03:00)
>>
>>> For s0ix DC9 is the pre-requisite rather then DC6, DC9 does not have
>>> any depende ncy on DMC.
>> Maybe DC6 and DC9 are pre-requisites for different S0ix sub-states?
>>
>> - BSpec 68851 says that DC6 is requirement for S0ix.
>> - BSpec 68857 says that DC9 supports S0ix with more power savings than
>>    DC6.
> DC6 is pre-requisite for runtime s0ix with PSR Display On use cases. Which is irrelevant for system wide suspend.
> Thanks,
> Anshuman.
>> --
>> Gustavo Sousa

Hi all,

Thanks for the comments. So if I have it right the only final change 
here is to switch the param to disable_display right ?

Thanks,

Suja