From: "Laguna, Lukasz" <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
To: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>,
<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <adam.miszczak@linux.intel.com>, <jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr: Add vf-driver option
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:39:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4794fbde-e17a-45fb-8750-ef15fe946e22@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418102621.467394-2-marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
On 4/18/2026 12:26, Marcin Bernatowicz wrote:
> Replace the boolean no-xe-vfio-pci switch with an explicit vf-driver
> mode selection: xe-vfio-pci, xe, and none.
> This allows to cover FLR behavior with different VF driver bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Adam Miszczak <adam.miszczak@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jakub Kolakowski <jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com>
> Cc: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr.c | 236 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 186 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr.c b/tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr.c
> index be949fe01..370cb8e1b 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr.c
> @@ -65,11 +65,21 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Xe tests for SR-IOV VF FLR (Functional Level Reset)");
> static const char STOP_REASON_ABORT[] = "ABORT";
> static const char STOP_REASON_FAIL[] = "FAIL";
> static const char STOP_REASON_SKIP[] = "SKIP";
> +static const char XE_VFIO_PCI_MODULE[] = "xe_vfio_pci";
> +static const char XE_VFIO_PCI_DRIVER[] = "xe-vfio-pci";
> +static const char XE_DRIVER[] = "xe";
> +static const char VF_DRIVER_MODE_NONE[] = "none";
>
> #define DRIVER_OVERRIDE_TIMEOUT_MS 200
>
> +enum vf_driver_mode {
> + VF_DRIVER_XE_VFIO_PCI,
> + VF_DRIVER_XE,
> + VF_DRIVER_NONE,
> +};
> +
> static int g_wait_flr_ms = 200;
> -static bool g_use_xe_vfio_pci = true;
> +static enum vf_driver_mode g_vf_driver = VF_DRIVER_XE_VFIO_PCI;
> static bool g_extended_scope;
>
> static struct g_mmio {
> @@ -139,6 +149,7 @@ struct subcheck_data {
> int pf_fd;
> int num_vfs;
> uint8_t tile;
> + enum vf_driver_mode vf_driver;
> char *stop_reason;
> };
>
> @@ -264,6 +275,61 @@ static bool is_subcheck_skipped(struct subcheck *subcheck)
> !strncmp(STOP_REASON_SKIP, subcheck->data->stop_reason, strlen(STOP_REASON_SKIP));
> }
>
> +static const char *vf_driver_mode_to_str(enum vf_driver_mode mode)
> +{
> + switch (mode) {
> + case VF_DRIVER_XE_VFIO_PCI:
> + return XE_VFIO_PCI_DRIVER;
> + case VF_DRIVER_XE:
> + return XE_DRIVER;
> + case VF_DRIVER_NONE:
> + return VF_DRIVER_MODE_NONE;
> + }
> +
> + igt_assert(false);
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static const char *vf_driver_mode_to_bound_driver(enum vf_driver_mode mode)
> +{
> + switch (mode) {
> + case VF_DRIVER_XE_VFIO_PCI:
> + return XE_VFIO_PCI_DRIVER;
> + case VF_DRIVER_XE:
> + return XE_DRIVER;
> + case VF_DRIVER_NONE:
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + igt_assert(false);
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static bool parse_vf_driver_mode(const char *optarg, enum vf_driver_mode *mode)
> +{
> + igt_assert(mode);
> +
> + if (!optarg)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (!strcasecmp(optarg, XE_VFIO_PCI_DRIVER)) {
> + *mode = VF_DRIVER_XE_VFIO_PCI;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + if (!strcasecmp(optarg, XE_DRIVER)) {
> + *mode = VF_DRIVER_XE;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + if (!strcasecmp(optarg, VF_DRIVER_MODE_NONE)) {
> + *mode = VF_DRIVER_NONE;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static void subchecks_report_results(struct subcheck *checks, int num_checks)
> {
> int fails = 0, skips = 0;
> @@ -332,6 +398,68 @@ static void vf_unbind_driver_override(int pf_fd, unsigned int vf_id)
> free(slot);
> }
>
> +struct vf_driver_binding {
> + enum vf_driver_mode mode;
> + bool xe_vfio_loaded;
> + bool *vf_bound;
> +};
> +
> +static bool setup_vf_driver(int pf_fd, int num_vfs, enum vf_driver_mode vf_driver,
> + struct vf_driver_binding *binding,
> + struct subcheck *checks, int num_checks)
> +{
> + igt_assert(binding);
> +
> + *binding = (struct vf_driver_binding) {
> + .mode = vf_driver,
> + };
> +
> + switch (vf_driver) {
> + case VF_DRIVER_XE_VFIO_PCI:
> + binding->xe_vfio_loaded = igt_kmod_load(XE_VFIO_PCI_MODULE, NULL) >= 0;
> + if (!binding->xe_vfio_loaded) {
> + igt_warn("%s module is not available, continuing without VF driver binding\n",
> + XE_VFIO_PCI_MODULE);
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + binding->vf_bound = calloc(num_vfs + 1, sizeof(*binding->vf_bound));
> + igt_assert(binding->vf_bound);
> +
> + igt_sriov_enable_driver_autoprobe(pf_fd);
> + for (int vf_id = 1; vf_id <= num_vfs; ++vf_id) {
> + binding->vf_bound[vf_id] =
> + vf_bind_driver_override(pf_fd, vf_id, XE_VFIO_PCI_DRIVER);
> + }
> + return true;
> + case VF_DRIVER_XE:
> + igt_sriov_enable_driver_autoprobe(pf_fd);
> + for (int vf_id = 1; vf_id <= num_vfs; ++vf_id)
> + igt_sriov_bind_vf_drm_driver(pf_fd, vf_id);
> + return true;
> + case VF_DRIVER_NONE:
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + igt_assert(false);
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup_vf_driver(int pf_fd, int num_vfs,
> + const struct vf_driver_binding *binding)
> +{
> + if (!binding)
> + return;
> +
> + if (binding->xe_vfio_loaded) {
> + for (int vf_id = 1; vf_id <= num_vfs; ++vf_id)
> + if (binding->vf_bound && binding->vf_bound[vf_id])
> + vf_unbind_driver_override(pf_fd, vf_id);
> + }
What if xe is loaded?
> +
> + free(binding->vf_bound);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * flr_exec_strategy - Function pointer for FLR execution strategy
> * @pf_fd: File descriptor for the Physical Function (PF).
> @@ -376,13 +504,13 @@ typedef int (*flr_exec_strategy)(int pf_fd, int num_vfs,
> *
> * A timeout is used to wait for FLR operations to complete.
> */
> -static void verify_flr(int pf_fd, int num_vfs, struct subcheck *checks,
> - int num_checks, flr_exec_strategy exec_strategy)
> +static void verify_flr(int pf_fd, int num_vfs, enum vf_driver_mode vf_driver,
> + struct subcheck *checks, int num_checks,
> + flr_exec_strategy exec_strategy)
> {
> const int wait_flr_ms = g_wait_flr_ms;
> int i, vf_id, flr_vf_id = -1;
> - bool xe_vfio_loaded;
> - bool *vf_bound = NULL;
> + struct vf_driver_binding binding = { .mode = vf_driver };
It'll be set in setup_vf_driver().
>
> igt_sriov_disable_driver_autoprobe(pf_fd);
> igt_sriov_enable_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs);
> @@ -393,17 +521,8 @@ static void verify_flr(int pf_fd, int num_vfs, struct subcheck *checks,
> if (igt_warn_on(igt_pci_system_reinit()))
> goto disable_vfs;
>
> - xe_vfio_loaded = false;
> - if (g_use_xe_vfio_pci)
> - xe_vfio_loaded = igt_kmod_load("xe_vfio_pci", NULL) >= 0;
> - if (xe_vfio_loaded) {
> - vf_bound = calloc(num_vfs + 1, sizeof(*vf_bound));
> - igt_assert(vf_bound);
> -
> - igt_sriov_enable_driver_autoprobe(pf_fd);
> - for (vf_id = 1; vf_id <= num_vfs; vf_id++)
> - vf_bound[vf_id] = vf_bind_driver_override(pf_fd, vf_id, "xe-vfio-pci");
> - }
> + if (!setup_vf_driver(pf_fd, num_vfs, vf_driver, &binding, checks, num_checks))
> + goto cleanup;
>
> init_mmio(pf_fd, num_vfs);
>
> @@ -426,14 +545,7 @@ cleanup:
> checks[i].cleanup(checks[i].data);
>
> cleanup_mmio();
> -
> - if (xe_vfio_loaded) {
> - for (vf_id = 1; vf_id <= num_vfs; vf_id++)
> - if (vf_bound && vf_bound[vf_id])
> - vf_unbind_driver_override(pf_fd, vf_id);
> - }
> -
> - free(vf_bound);
> + cleanup_vf_driver(pf_fd, num_vfs, &binding);
>
> disable_vfs:
> igt_sriov_disable_vfs(pf_fd);
> @@ -1025,27 +1137,44 @@ static void regs_subcheck_cleanup(struct subcheck_data *data)
>
> static void reset_only_subcheck_init(struct subcheck_data *data)
> {
Shouldn't it be noop? And similarly to other subtests, the "reset-only"
subtest should also load the xe-vfio-pci if needed?
> - if (!g_use_xe_vfio_pci) {
> - set_skip_reason(data, "xe-vfio-pci binding is disabled\n");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (!igt_kmod_is_loaded("xe_vfio_pci"))
> - set_skip_reason(data, "xe_vfio_pci is not loaded\n");
> + if (data->vf_driver == VF_DRIVER_XE_VFIO_PCI &&
> + !igt_kmod_is_loaded(XE_VFIO_PCI_MODULE))
> + set_skip_reason(data, "%s is not loaded\n", XE_VFIO_PCI_MODULE);
> }
>
> static void reset_only_subcheck_prepare_vf(int vf_id, struct subcheck_data *data)
> {
This would be also not needed?
> char *slot = igt_sriov_get_vf_pci_slot_alloc(data->pf_fd, vf_id);
> - char bound[64];
> + char bound[64] = "none";
> + const char *expected_driver = vf_driver_mode_to_bound_driver(data->vf_driver);
> int bound_ret;
>
> + if (data->stop_reason)
> + return;
> +
> igt_assert(slot);
>
> bound_ret = igt_pci_get_bound_driver_name(slot, bound, sizeof(bound));
> - if (bound_ret <= 0 || strcmp(bound, "xe-vfio-pci") != 0)
> - set_skip_reason(data, "VF%u not bound to xe-vfio-pci\n", vf_id);
> + if (bound_ret < 0) {
> + set_abort_reason(data, "Failed to query VF%u driver binding (%d)\n",
> + vf_id, bound_ret);
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> + if (!expected_driver) {
> + if (bound_ret > 0)
> + set_abort_reason(data,
> + "VF%u unexpectedly bound to %s in %s mode\n",
> + vf_id, bound, vf_driver_mode_to_str(data->vf_driver));
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (bound_ret <= 0 || strcmp(bound, expected_driver) != 0)
> + set_skip_reason(data, "VF%u not bound to %s in %s mode\n",
> + vf_id, expected_driver,
> + vf_driver_mode_to_str(data->vf_driver));
> +
> +out:
> free(slot);
> }
>
> @@ -1057,12 +1186,14 @@ static void noop_subcheck_cleanup(struct subcheck_data *data)
> {
> }
>
> -static void reset_only_test(int pf_fd, int num_vfs, flr_exec_strategy exec_strategy)
> +static void reset_only_test(int pf_fd, int num_vfs, enum vf_driver_mode vf_driver,
> + flr_exec_strategy exec_strategy)
> {
> struct subcheck_data base = {
> .pf_fd = pf_fd,
> .num_vfs = num_vfs,
> .tile = 0,
> + .vf_driver = vf_driver,
> .stop_reason = NULL,
> };
> struct subcheck check = {
> @@ -1074,10 +1205,11 @@ static void reset_only_test(int pf_fd, int num_vfs, flr_exec_strategy exec_strat
> .cleanup = noop_subcheck_cleanup,
> };
>
> - verify_flr(pf_fd, num_vfs, &check, 1, exec_strategy);
> + verify_flr(pf_fd, num_vfs, vf_driver, &check, 1, exec_strategy);
> }
>
> -static void clear_tests(int pf_fd, int num_vfs, flr_exec_strategy exec_strategy)
> +static void clear_tests(int pf_fd, int num_vfs, enum vf_driver_mode vf_driver,
> + flr_exec_strategy exec_strategy)
> {
> const uint8_t num_tiles = xe_tiles_count(pf_fd);
> struct subcheck_data base;
> @@ -1094,7 +1226,8 @@ static void clear_tests(int pf_fd, int num_vfs, flr_exec_strategy exec_strategy)
> igt_assert_lt(i, num_tiles);
> base = (struct subcheck_data){ .pf_fd = pf_fd,
> .num_vfs = num_vfs,
> - .tile = t };
> + .tile = t,
> + .vf_driver = vf_driver };
>
> gdata[i] = (struct ggtt_data){
> .base = base,
> @@ -1152,7 +1285,7 @@ static void clear_tests(int pf_fd, int num_vfs, flr_exec_strategy exec_strategy)
> igt_assert_eq(i, num_tiles);
> igt_assert_eq(i * subcheck_count, num_checks);
>
> - verify_flr(pf_fd, num_vfs, checks, num_checks, exec_strategy);
> + verify_flr(pf_fd, num_vfs, vf_driver, checks, num_checks, exec_strategy);
> }
>
> static int opt_handler(int opt, int opt_index, void *data)
> @@ -1164,9 +1297,10 @@ static int opt_handler(int opt, int opt_index, void *data)
> case 'e':
> g_extended_scope = true;
> break;
> - case 'v':
> - g_use_xe_vfio_pci = false;
> - igt_info("xe-vfio-pci binding: disabled\n");
> + case 'd':
> + if (!parse_vf_driver_mode(optarg, &g_vf_driver))
> + return IGT_OPT_HANDLER_ERROR;
> + igt_info("VF driver mode: %s\n", vf_driver_mode_to_str(g_vf_driver));
> break;
> case 'w':
> errno = 0;
> @@ -1185,17 +1319,17 @@ static int opt_handler(int opt, int opt_index, void *data)
>
> static const struct option long_options[] = {
> { .name = "extended", .has_arg = false, .val = 'e', },
> - { .name = "no-xe-vfio-pci", .has_arg = false, .val = 'v', },
> + { .name = "vf-driver", .has_arg = true, .val = 'd', },
> { .name = "wait-flr-ms", .has_arg = true, .val = 'w', },
> {},
> };
>
> static const char help_str[] =
> " --extended\t\tRun extended scope\n"
> - " --no-xe-vfio-pci\tDo not load/bind xe-vfio-pci for VFs\n"
> + " --vf-driver=DRIVER\tVF driver mode: xe-vfio-pci, xe, or none (default: xe-vfio-pci)\n"
> " --wait-flr-ms=MS\tSleep MS milliseconds after VF reset sysfs write (default: 200)\n";
>
> -int igt_main_args("evw:", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
> +int igt_main_args("ed:w:", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
> {
> int pf_fd;
> bool autoprobe;
> @@ -1214,13 +1348,14 @@ int igt_main_args("evw:", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
> break;
>
> igt_dynamic_f("numvfs-%u", vf_num)
> - reset_only_test(pf_fd, vf_num, execute_sequential_flr);
> + reset_only_test(pf_fd, vf_num, g_vf_driver,
> + execute_sequential_flr);
> }
> }
>
> igt_describe("Verify LMEM, GGTT, and SCRATCH_REGS are properly cleared after VF1 FLR");
> igt_subtest("flr-vf1-clear") {
> - clear_tests(pf_fd, 1, execute_sequential_flr);
> + clear_tests(pf_fd, 1, g_vf_driver, execute_sequential_flr);
> }
>
> igt_describe("Perform sequential FLR on each VF, verifying that LMEM, GGTT, and SCRATCH_REGS are cleared only on the reset VF.");
> @@ -1229,7 +1364,8 @@ int igt_main_args("evw:", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
>
> igt_require(total_vfs > 1);
>
> - clear_tests(pf_fd, total_vfs > 3 ? 3 : total_vfs, execute_sequential_flr);
> + clear_tests(pf_fd, total_vfs > 3 ? 3 : total_vfs,
> + g_vf_driver, execute_sequential_flr);
> }
>
> igt_describe("Perform FLR on all VFs in parallel, ensuring correct behavior during simultaneous resets.");
> @@ -1238,12 +1374,12 @@ int igt_main_args("evw:", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
>
> igt_require(total_vfs > 1);
>
> - clear_tests(pf_fd, total_vfs, execute_parallel_flr);
> + clear_tests(pf_fd, total_vfs, g_vf_driver, execute_parallel_flr);
> }
>
> igt_describe("Initiate FLR twice in parallel on same VF.");
> igt_subtest("flr-twice") {
> - clear_tests(pf_fd, 1, execute_parallel_flr_twice);
> + clear_tests(pf_fd, 1, g_vf_driver, execute_parallel_flr_twice);
> }
>
> igt_fixture() {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-18 10:26 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr: VF driver mode option and xe_vfio_pci state restore Marcin Bernatowicz
2026-04-18 10:26 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr: Add vf-driver option Marcin Bernatowicz
2026-04-30 12:39 ` Laguna, Lukasz [this message]
2026-04-18 10:26 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr: Restore xe_vfio_pci module state Marcin Bernatowicz
2026-04-30 12:40 ` Laguna, Lukasz
2026-04-21 13:54 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr: VF driver mode option and xe_vfio_pci state restore Patchwork
2026-04-21 14:03 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-21 15:40 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-21 17:39 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4794fbde-e17a-45fb-8750-ef15fe946e22@intel.com \
--to=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
--cc=adam.miszczak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com \
--cc=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox