Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: "Bernatowicz, Marcin" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>,
	Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>,
	igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Skip syncobj_wait during the gt_reset
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 11:22:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53783573-6681-49ec-b400-cb85dfedcf8f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05ef47a7-663a-4fc4-a069-0c3f3f4c385b@linux.intel.com>

On 27/09/2024 11:05, Bernatowicz, Marcin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/25/2024 12:31 PM, Bommu Krishnaiah wrote:
>> From: "Bommu Krishnaiah" <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>
>>
>> Skipping the syncobj_wait for the workloads which is submitted
>> before gt reset, since After gt reset There is no expectation
>> from the hardware/GuC/KMD that the workload will then
>> re-execute and complete.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>
>> Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c | 8 +++++---
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
>> index b5d5f43ea..b1a7548c6 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
>> @@ -263,8 +263,9 @@ test_balancer(int fd, int gt, int class, int 
>> n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
>>       }
>>       for (i = 0; i < n_exec_queues && n_execs; i++)
>> -        igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &syncobjs[i], 1, INT64_MAX, 0,
>> -                    NULL));
>> +        if (!(flags & GT_RESET))
>> +            igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &syncobjs[i], 1, INT64_MAX,
> 
> What happens when the user waits on syncobj in case of GT reset ?
> Maybe there is no expectation that there will be re-execute, but 
> shouldn't the syncobj be notified or a timeout hit ?

Yeah, this sounds like KMD bug. Expectation is that dma fences should 
eventually signal no matter what, and in a reasonable amount of time.

Possibly relevant fix (very recently merged): 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/605681/?series=136463&rev=1

> 
>> +                        0, NULL));
>>       igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &sync[0].handle, 1, INT64_MAX, 0, 
>> NULL));
>>       sync[0].flags |= DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL;
>> @@ -410,7 +411,8 @@ test_legacy_mode(int fd, struct 
>> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
>>       }
>>       for (i = 0; i < n_exec_queues && n_execs; i++)
>> -        igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &syncobjs[i], 1, INT64_MAX, 0,
>> +        if (!(flags & GT_RESET))
>> +            igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &syncobjs[i], 1, INT64_MAX, 0,
>>                       NULL));
>>       igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &sync[0].handle, 1, INT64_MAX, 0, 
>> NULL));
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-27 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-25 10:31 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Skip syncobj_wait during the gt_reset Bommu Krishnaiah
2024-09-26  5:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2024-09-26  5:24 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-26 17:03 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-27 10:05 ` [PATCH i-g-t] " Bernatowicz, Marcin
2024-09-27 10:22   ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2024-09-30 10:18     ` Bommu, Krishnaiah
2024-10-03 16:08       ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53783573-6681-49ec-b400-cb85dfedcf8f@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com \
    --cc=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox