Hello,

Possible regressions listed here are not related to my patch. I'm not touching testcase being suspected as a regression or any igt libary code either.

BR,

Jouni Högander

On Sat, 2023-08-19 at 12:13 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
Patch Details
Series: tests/i915: Take into account fbc_status "stolen memory not initialised"
URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/122619/
State: failure
Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_9619/index.html

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13535_full -> IGTPW_9619_full

Summary

FAILURE

Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_9619_full absolutely need to be
verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in IGTPW_9619_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_9619/index.html

Participating hosts (9 -> 9)

No changes in participating hosts

Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_9619_full:

IGT changes

Possible regressions

Known issues

Here are the changes found in IGTPW_9619_full that come from known issues:

IGT changes

Issues hit

Possible fixes

Warnings

{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

Build changes

CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_13535: d3fd5e38264df85151b6deba3df6ee80c745c9ce @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGTPW_9619: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_9619/index.html
IGT_7443: 953448dbf2e63918a8eced9707f65fc0a19a9c85 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit