From: "Hellstrom, Thomas" <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
To: "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Sharma, Nishit" <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 13:00:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <63c6659ae13e5d46c9ed65dbdc9cfbed1d26c363.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251113163308.633818-4-nishit.sharma@intel.com>
On Thu, 2025-11-13 at 16:33 +0000, nishit.sharma@intel.com wrote:
> From: Nishit Sharma <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
>
> This test allocates a buffer in SVM, writes data to it from src GPU ,
> and reads/verifies
> the data from dst GPU. Optionally, the CPU also reads or modifies the
> buffer and both
> GPUs verify the results, ensuring correct cross-GPU and CPU memory
> access in a
> multi-GPU environment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishit Sharma <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c | 373
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/meson.build | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 374 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c
> b/tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..6614ea3d1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,373 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +
> +#include "drmtest.h"
> +#include "igt.h"
> +#include "igt_multigpu.h"
> +
> +#include "intel_blt.h"
> +#include "intel_mocs.h"
> +#include "intel_reg.h"
> +
> +#include "xe/xe_ioctl.h"
> +#include "xe/xe_query.h"
> +#include "xe/xe_util.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * TEST: Basic multi-gpu SVM testing
> + * Category: SVM
> + * Mega feature: Compute
> + * Sub-category: Compute tests
> + * Functionality: SVM p2p access, madvise and prefetch.
> + * Test category: functionality test
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: cross-gpu-mem-access
> + * Description:
> + * This test creates two malloced regions, places the
> destination
> + * region both remotely and locally and copies to it. Reads
> back to
> + * system memory and checks the result.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#define MAX_XE_REGIONS 8
> +#define MAX_XE_GPUS 8
> +#define NUM_LOOPS 1
> +#define BATCH_SIZE(_fd) ALIGN(SZ_8K, xe_get_default_alignment(_fd))
> +#define BIND_SYNC_VAL 0x686868
> +#define EXEC_SYNC_VAL 0x676767
> +#define COPY_SIZE SZ_64M
> +
> +struct xe_svm_gpu_info {
> + bool supports_faults;
> + int vram_regions[MAX_XE_REGIONS];
> + unsigned int num_regions;
> + unsigned int va_bits;
> + int fd;
> +};
> +
> +struct multigpu_ops_args {
> + bool prefetch_req;
> + bool op_mod;
> +};
> +
> +typedef void (*gpu_pair_fn) (
> + struct xe_svm_gpu_info *src,
> + struct xe_svm_gpu_info *dst,
> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> + void *extra_args
> +);
> +
> +static void for_each_gpu_pair(int num_gpus,
> + struct xe_svm_gpu_info *gpus,
> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance
> *eci,
> + gpu_pair_fn fn,
> + void *extra_args);
> +
> +static void gpu_mem_access_wrapper(struct xe_svm_gpu_info *src,
> + struct xe_svm_gpu_info *dst,
> + struct
> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> + void *extra_args);
> +
> +static void open_pagemaps(int fd, struct xe_svm_gpu_info *info);
> +
> +static void
> +create_vm_and_queue(struct xe_svm_gpu_info *gpu, struct
> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> + uint32_t *vm, uint32_t *exec_queue)
> +{
> + *vm = xe_vm_create(gpu->fd,
> + DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE |
> DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE, 0);
> + *exec_queue = xe_exec_queue_create(gpu->fd, *vm, eci, 0);
> + xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(gpu->fd, *vm, 0, 0, 0, 1ull << gpu-
> >va_bits,
> + DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +setup_sync(struct drm_xe_sync *sync, volatile uint64_t **sync_addr,
> uint64_t timeline_value)
> +{
> + *sync_addr = malloc(sizeof(**sync_addr));
> + igt_assert(*sync_addr);
> + sync->flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL;
> + sync->type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE;
> + sync->addr = to_user_pointer((uint64_t *)*sync_addr);
> + sync->timeline_value = timeline_value;
> + **sync_addr = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +cleanup_vm_and_queue(struct xe_svm_gpu_info *gpu, uint32_t vm,
> uint32_t exec_queue)
> +{
> + xe_vm_unbind_lr_sync(gpu->fd, vm, 0, 0, 1ull << gpu-
> >va_bits);
> + xe_exec_queue_destroy(gpu->fd, exec_queue);
> + xe_vm_destroy(gpu->fd, vm);
> +}
> +
> +static void xe_multigpu_madvise(int src_fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t
> addr, uint64_t size,
> + uint64_t ext, uint32_t type, int
> dst_fd, uint16_t policy,
> + uint16_t instance, uint32_t
> exec_queue, int local_fd,
> + uint16_t local_vram)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> +#define SYSTEM_MEMORY 0
Please use DRM_XE_PREFERRED_LOC_DEFAULT_SYSTEM.
A new define isn't necessary and it's also incorrect.
> + if (src_fd != dst_fd) {
> + ret = xe_vm_madvise(src_fd, vm, addr, size, ext,
> type, dst_fd, policy, instance);
> + if (ret == -ENOLINK) {
> + igt_info("No fast interconnect between GPU0
> and GPU1, falling back to local VRAM\n");
> + ret = xe_vm_madvise(src_fd, vm, addr, size,
> ext, type, local_fd,
> + policy, local_vram);
Please use DRM_XE_PREFERRED_LOC_DEFAULT_DEVICE
> + if (ret) {
> + igt_info("Local VRAM madvise failed,
> falling back to system memory\n");
> + ret = xe_vm_madvise(src_fd, vm,
> addr, size, ext, type,
> + SYSTEM_MEMORY,
> policy, SYSTEM_MEMORY);
>
> + igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> + }
> + } else {
> + igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> + }
> + } else {
> + ret = xe_vm_madvise(src_fd, vm, addr, size, ext,
> type, dst_fd, policy, instance);
> + igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> +
> + }
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void xe_multigpu_prefetch(int src_fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t
> addr, uint64_t size,
> + struct drm_xe_sync *sync, volatile
> uint64_t *sync_addr,
> + uint32_t exec_queue, bool
> prefetch_req)
> +{
> + if (prefetch_req) {
> + xe_vm_prefetch_async(src_fd, vm, 0, 0, addr, size,
> sync, 1,
> +
> DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC);
> + if (*sync_addr != sync->timeline_value)
> + xe_wait_ufence(src_fd, (uint64_t
> *)sync_addr, sync->timeline_value,
> + exec_queue, NSEC_PER_SEC *
> 10);
> + }
> + free((void *)sync_addr);
> +}
> +
> +static void for_each_gpu_pair(int num_gpus, struct xe_svm_gpu_info
> *gpus,
> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance
> *eci,
> + gpu_pair_fn fn, void *extra_args)
> +{
> + for (int src = 0; src < num_gpus; src++) {
> + if(!gpus[src].supports_faults)
> + continue;
> +
> + for (int dst = 0; dst < num_gpus; dst++) {
> + if (src == dst)
> + continue;
> + fn(&gpus[src], &gpus[dst], eci, extra_args);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void batch_init(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t src_addr,
> + uint64_t dst_addr, uint64_t copy_size,
> + uint32_t *bo, uint64_t *addr)
> +{
> + uint32_t width = copy_size / 256;
> + uint32_t height = 1;
> + uint32_t batch_bo_size = BATCH_SIZE(fd);
> + uint32_t batch_bo;
> + uint64_t batch_addr;
> + void *batch;
> + uint32_t *cmd;
> + uint32_t mocs_index = intel_get_uc_mocs_index(fd);
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + batch_bo = xe_bo_create(fd, vm, batch_bo_size,
> vram_if_possible(fd, 0), 0);
> + batch = xe_bo_map(fd, batch_bo, batch_bo_size);
> + cmd = (uint32_t *) batch;
> + cmd[i++] = MEM_COPY_CMD | (1 << 19);
> + cmd[i++] = width - 1;
> + cmd[i++] = height - 1;
> + cmd[i++] = width - 1;
> + cmd[i++] = width - 1;
> + cmd[i++] = src_addr & ((1UL << 32) - 1);
> + cmd[i++] = src_addr >> 32;
> + cmd[i++] = dst_addr & ((1UL << 32) - 1);
> + cmd[i++] = dst_addr >> 32;
> + cmd[i++] = mocs_index << XE2_MEM_COPY_MOCS_SHIFT |
> mocs_index;
> + cmd[i++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> + cmd[i++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> +
> + batch_addr = to_user_pointer(batch);
> + /* Punch a gap in the SVM map where we map the batch_bo */
> + xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd, vm, batch_bo, 0, batch_addr,
> batch_bo_size, 0);
> + *bo = batch_bo;
> + *addr = batch_addr;
> +}
> +
> +static void batch_fini(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint32_t bo, uint64_t
> addr)
> +{
> + /* Unmap the batch bo by re-instating the SVM binding. */
> + xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd, vm, 0, 0, addr, BATCH_SIZE(fd),
> + DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR);
> + gem_close(fd, bo);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void open_pagemaps(int fd, struct xe_svm_gpu_info *info)
> +{
> + unsigned int count = 0;
> + uint64_t regions = all_memory_regions(fd);
> + uint32_t region;
> +
> + xe_for_each_mem_region(fd, regions, region) {
> + if (XE_IS_VRAM_MEMORY_REGION(fd, region)) {
> + struct drm_xe_mem_region *mem_region =
> + xe_mem_region(fd, 1ull << (region -
> 1));
> + igt_assert(count < MAX_XE_REGIONS);
> + info->vram_regions[count++] = mem_region-
> >instance;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + info->num_regions = count;
> +}
> +
> +static int get_device_info(struct xe_svm_gpu_info gpus[], int
> num_gpus)
> +{
> + int cnt;
> + int xe;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0, cnt = 0 && i < 128; cnt < num_gpus; i++) {
> + xe = __drm_open_driver_another(i, DRIVER_XE);
> + if (xe < 0)
> + break;
> +
> + gpus[cnt].fd = xe;
> + cnt++;
> + }
> +
> + return cnt;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +copy_src_dst(struct xe_svm_gpu_info *gpu0,
> + struct xe_svm_gpu_info *gpu1,
> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> + bool prefetch_req)
> +{
> + uint32_t vm[1];
> + uint32_t exec_queue[2];
> + uint32_t batch_bo;
> + void *copy_src, *copy_dst;
> + uint64_t batch_addr;
> + struct drm_xe_sync sync = {};
> + volatile uint64_t *sync_addr;
> + int local_fd = gpu0->fd;
> + uint16_t local_vram = gpu0->vram_regions[0];
> +
> + create_vm_and_queue(gpu0, eci, &vm[0], &exec_queue[0]);
> +
> + /* Allocate source and destination buffers */
> + copy_src = aligned_alloc(xe_get_default_alignment(gpu0->fd),
> SZ_64M);
> + igt_assert(copy_src);
> + copy_dst = aligned_alloc(xe_get_default_alignment(gpu1->fd),
> SZ_64M);
> + igt_assert(copy_dst);
> +
> + /*
> + * Initialize, map and bind the batch bo. Note that Xe
> doesn't seem to enjoy
> + * batch buffer memory accessed over PCIe p2p.
> + */
> + batch_init(gpu0->fd, vm[0], to_user_pointer(copy_src),
> to_user_pointer(copy_dst),
> + COPY_SIZE, &batch_bo, &batch_addr);
> +
> + /* Fill the source with a pattern, clear the destination. */
> + memset(copy_src, 0x67, COPY_SIZE);
> + memset(copy_dst, 0x0, COPY_SIZE);
> +
> + xe_multigpu_madvise(gpu0->fd, vm[0],
> to_user_pointer(copy_dst), COPY_SIZE,
> + 0, DRM_XE_MEM_RANGE_ATTR_PREFERRED_LOC,
> + gpu1->fd, 0, gpu1->vram_regions[0],
> exec_queue[0],
> + local_fd, local_vram);
> +
> + setup_sync(&sync, &sync_addr, BIND_SYNC_VAL);
> + xe_multigpu_prefetch(gpu0->fd, vm[0],
> to_user_pointer(copy_dst), COPY_SIZE, &sync,
> + sync_addr, exec_queue[0],
> prefetch_req);
> +
> + sync_addr = (void *)((char *)batch_addr + SZ_4K);
> + sync.addr = to_user_pointer((uint64_t *)sync_addr);
> + sync.timeline_value = EXEC_SYNC_VAL;
> + *sync_addr = 0;
> +
> + /* Execute a GPU copy. */
> + xe_exec_sync(gpu0->fd, exec_queue[0], batch_addr, &sync, 1);
> + if (*sync_addr != EXEC_SYNC_VAL)
> + xe_wait_ufence(gpu0->fd, (uint64_t *)sync_addr,
> EXEC_SYNC_VAL, exec_queue[0],
> + NSEC_PER_SEC * 10);
> +
> + igt_assert(memcmp(copy_src, copy_dst, COPY_SIZE) == 0);
> +
> + free(copy_dst);
> + free(copy_src);
> + munmap((void *)batch_addr, BATCH_SIZE(gpu0->fd));
> + batch_fini(gpu0->fd, vm[0], batch_bo, batch_addr);
> + cleanup_vm_and_queue(gpu0, vm[0], exec_queue[0]);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +gpu_mem_access_wrapper(struct xe_svm_gpu_info *src,
> + struct xe_svm_gpu_info *dst,
> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> + void *extra_args)
> +{
> + struct multigpu_ops_args *args = (struct multigpu_ops_args
> *)extra_args;
> + igt_assert(src);
> + igt_assert(dst);
> +
> + copy_src_dst(src, dst, eci, args->prefetch_req);
> +}
> +
> +igt_main
> +{
> + struct xe_svm_gpu_info gpus[MAX_XE_GPUS];
> + struct xe_device *xe;
> + int gpu, gpu_cnt;
> +
> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance eci = {
> + .engine_class = DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY,
> + };
> +
> + igt_fixture {
> + gpu_cnt = get_device_info(gpus, ARRAY_SIZE(gpus));
> + igt_skip_on(gpu_cnt < 2);
> +
> + for (gpu = 0; gpu < gpu_cnt; ++gpu) {
> + igt_assert(gpu < MAX_XE_GPUS);
> +
> + open_pagemaps(gpus[gpu].fd, &gpus[gpu]);
> + /* NOTE! inverted return value. */
> + gpus[gpu].supports_faults =
> !xe_supports_faults(gpus[gpu].fd);
> + fprintf(stderr, "GPU %u has %u VRAM
> regions%s, and %s SVM VMs.\n",
> + gpu, gpus[gpu].num_regions,
> + gpus[gpu].num_regions != 1 ? "s" :
> "",
> + gpus[gpu].supports_faults ?
> "supports" : "doesn't support");
> +
> + xe = xe_device_get(gpus[gpu].fd);
> + gpus[gpu].va_bits = xe->va_bits;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + igt_describe("gpu-gpu write-read");
> + igt_subtest("cross-gpu-mem-access") {
> + struct multigpu_ops_args op_args;
> + op_args.prefetch_req = 1;
> + for_each_gpu_pair(gpu_cnt, gpus, &eci,
> gpu_mem_access_wrapper, &op_args);
> + op_args.prefetch_req = 0;
> + for_each_gpu_pair(gpu_cnt, gpus, &eci,
> gpu_mem_access_wrapper, &op_args);
Wouldn't a separate test make sense here, like many other tests defines
a base test with variants that are indicated in an unsigned long flags?
So we have cross-gpu-mem-access-%s where %s can take "basic" and
"prefetch"?
> + }
> +
> + igt_fixture {
> + int cnt;
> +
> + for (cnt = 0; cnt < gpu_cnt; cnt++)
> + drm_close_driver(gpus[cnt].fd);
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/tests/meson.build b/tests/meson.build
> index 9736f2338..1209f84a4 100644
> --- a/tests/meson.build
> +++ b/tests/meson.build
> @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ intel_xe_progs = [
> 'xe_media_fill',
> 'xe_mmap',
> 'xe_module_load',
> + 'xe_multi_gpusvm',
> 'xe_noexec_ping_pong',
> 'xe_oa',
> 'xe_pat',
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-13 16:32 [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] Madvise feature in SVM for Multi-GPU configs nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 01/10] lib/xe: Add instance parameter to xe_vm_madvise and introduce lr_sync helpers nishit.sharma
2025-11-17 12:34 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-17 15:43 ` Sharma, Nishit
2025-11-18 9:23 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-13 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 02/10] tests/intel/xe_exec_system_allocator: Add parameter in madvise call nishit.sharma
2025-11-17 12:38 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-13 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-17 13:00 ` Hellstrom, Thomas [this message]
2025-11-17 15:49 ` Sharma, Nishit
2025-11-17 20:40 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-18 9:24 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-13 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 04/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c: Add SVM multi-GPU atomic operations nishit.sharma
2025-11-17 13:10 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-17 15:50 ` Sharma, Nishit
2025-11-18 9:26 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-13 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 05/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c: Add SVM multi-GPU coherency test nishit.sharma
2025-11-17 14:02 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-17 16:18 ` Sharma, Nishit
2025-11-27 7:36 ` Gurram, Pravalika
2025-11-13 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 06/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c: Add SVM multi-GPU performance test nishit.sharma
2025-11-17 14:39 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-13 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 07/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c: Add SVM multi-GPU fault handling test nishit.sharma
2025-11-17 14:48 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-13 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 08/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c: Add SVM multi-GPU simultaneous access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-17 14:57 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2025-11-13 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 09/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm.c: Add SVM multi-GPU conflicting madvise test nishit.sharma
2025-11-17 15:11 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-13 17:16 [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] Madvise feature in SVM for Multi-GPU configs nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:16 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-18 13:36 ` Gurram, Pravalika
2025-11-19 13:00 ` Gurram, Pravalika
2025-11-13 17:15 [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] Madvise feature in SVM for Multi-GPU configs nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:15 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:09 [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] SVM madvise feature in multi-GPU config nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:09 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:04 [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] Add SVM madvise feature for multi-GPU configurations nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 16:49 [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] Madvise feature in SVM for Multi-GPU configs nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 16:49 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test nishit.sharma
2025-11-04 15:31 [PATCH i-g-t v2 0/7] Madvise feature in SVM for Multi-GPU configs nishit.sharma
2025-11-13 17:00 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 00/10] " Nishit Sharma
2025-11-13 17:00 ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 03/10] tests/intel/xe_multi_gpusvm: Add SVM multi-GPU cross-GPU memory access test Nishit Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=63c6659ae13e5d46c9ed65dbdc9cfbed1d26c363.camel@intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nishit.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).