Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sharma, Nishit" <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
To: Sobin Thomas <sobin.thomas@intel.com>,
	<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>, <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v5 5/5] tests/intel: Add oversubscribe concurrent bind stress subtest
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:47:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <663ce7c8-e218-4f6a-bafd-bc2f78febfb9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922110438.2402109-6-sobin.thomas@intel.com>


On 9/22/2026 4:34 PM, Sobin Thomas wrote:
> Add test for oversubscribing VRAM in multi process environment that
> creates VM, bind large BOs and submit workloads nearly simultaneously.
>
> Previous coverage lacked a scenario combining multi-process bind
> with VRAM oversubscription. This generates memory pressure with
> multi-process VM Bind activity and concurrent submission, exercising
> the bind pipeline under eviction pressure.
>
> v3: Fixed minor nits
> v4: Refactoring of the create_bo ( Nishit)
>      Fix child process exit deadlock in release_ready_processes() (Nishit)
>
> Signed-off-by: Sobin Thomas <sobin.thomas@intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/intel/xe_bo_alloc.c | 533 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 532 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_bo_alloc.c b/tests/intel/xe_bo_alloc.c
> index d8368087b..2ee468c62 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_bo_alloc.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_bo_alloc.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,17 @@
>   #define THREAD_VA_STRIDE GB(1)
>   #define SZ_4K_SHIFT	12
>   #define MAX_ALLOCATIONS 50000
> +#define INT_ADD_CNT 4
> +#define TIMEOUT_NS (30ULL * 1000000000ULL)
> +#define MAX_SRAM_TEST_SIZE GB(32)
> +#define GPR_RX_ADDR(x)          (0x600 + (x) * 8)
> +#define MAX_PROCS 20
> +
> +#define EXEC_DATA_ADDR		0x100000ULL
> +#define EXEC_RESULT_ADDR	0x200000ULL
> +#define EXEC_BATCH_ADDR		0x300000ULL
> +#define EXEC_UFENCE_ADDR	0x400000ULL
> +#define STRESS_BIND_ADDR	0x40000000ULL
>   
>   /**
>    * SUBTEST: all-sizes-once
> @@ -76,14 +87,48 @@
>    * Description: Test 50 random BO allocation sizes in test table with a thread per engine,
>    * leak the binding, unaligned bind addresses
>    * Test category: stress test
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: test_vm_oversubscribe_concurrent_bind
> + * Description: Test enough random BO allocation sizes, bound as arrays of binds, to trigger
> + * evictions with 2 processes per engine, leak the BO munmap / gem close, unaligned bind addresses
> + * Test category: stress test
>    */
>   
>   #define GB(x) (1024ULL * 1024ULL * 1024ULL * (x))
>   #define MIN_BUFS_PER_PROC 2
>   
>   #define N_ALLOC_SIZES	256
> +#define USER_FENCE_VALUE 0xdeadbeefdeadbeefull
> +
>   static uint64_t *alloc_sizes;
>   
> +struct gem_bo {
> +	uint32_t handle;
> +	uint64_t size;
> +	uint32_t *ptr;
> +	uint64_t addr;
> +};
> +
> +struct xe_oversubscribe_ctx {
> +	uint32_t vm_id;
> +	uint32_t exec_queue_id;
> +};
> +
> +struct mem_bind_sync {
> +	struct gem_bo *bufs;
> +	int n_bufs;
> +	uint64_t *binds_ufence;
> +};
> +
> +struct process_data {
> +	pthread_mutex_t mutex;
> +	pthread_cond_t cond;
> +	int ready;
> +	int failed;
> +	pthread_barrier_t barrier;
> +	bool go;
> +};
> +
>   /*
>    * Data-driven subtest matrix.
>    *
> @@ -103,7 +148,8 @@ enum test_type {
>   	TYPE_ALL_SIZES,
>   	TYPE_RANDOM_SIZE,
>   	TYPE_ARRAY_BIND,
> -	TYPE_THREAD
> +	TYPE_THREAD,
> +	TYPE_OVERSUBSCRIBE,
>   };
>   
>   struct test_case {
> @@ -114,6 +160,14 @@ struct test_case {
>   	bool requires_evict_ram;
>   };
>   
> +struct oversubscribe_params {
> +	int n_proc;
> +	int n_vram_bufs;
> +	int n_sram_bufs;
> +	uint64_t vram_size;
> +	uint64_t sram_size;
> +	uint64_t total_vram_demand;
> +};
>   #define LEAK_BINDING		(0x1 << 0)
>   #define LEAK_BO			(0x1 << 1)
>   #define EVICT			(0x1 << 2)
> @@ -244,6 +298,478 @@ static int __xe_vm_bind_array(int fd, uint32_t vm,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static void init_pdata(struct process_data *pdata)
> +{
> +	pthread_mutexattr_t mattr;
> +	pthread_condattr_t cattr;
> +
> +	pthread_mutexattr_init(&mattr);
> +	igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutexattr_setpshared(&mattr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED), 0);
> +	igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutexattr_setrobust(&mattr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST), 0);
> +	igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_init(&pdata->mutex, &mattr), 0);
> +	pthread_mutexattr_destroy(&mattr);
> +
> +	pthread_condattr_init(&cattr);
> +	igt_assert_eq(pthread_condattr_setpshared(&cattr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED), 0);
> +	igt_assert_eq(pthread_cond_init(&pdata->cond, &cattr), 0);
> +	pthread_condattr_destroy(&cattr);
> +	pdata->ready = 0;
> +	pdata->failed = 0;
> +	pdata->go = false;
> +}
> +
> +static void process_ready_and_wait(struct process_data *pdata)
> +{
> +	int ret = pthread_mutex_lock(&pdata->mutex);
> +
> +	if (ret == EOWNERDEAD)
> +		igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_consistent(&pdata->mutex), 0);
> +	else
> +		igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> +	pdata->ready++;
> +	pthread_cond_broadcast(&pdata->cond);
> +	while (!pdata->go)
> +		pthread_cond_wait(&pdata->cond, &pdata->mutex);
> +	pthread_mutex_unlock(&pdata->mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static void process_setup_failed(struct process_data *pdata)
> +{
> +	int ret = pthread_mutex_lock(&pdata->mutex);
> +
> +	if (ret == EOWNERDEAD)
> +		igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_consistent(&pdata->mutex), 0);
> +	else
> +		igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> +	pdata->failed++;
> +	pthread_cond_broadcast(&pdata->cond);
> +	pthread_mutex_unlock(&pdata->mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static void release_ready_processes(struct process_data *pdata, int n_proc)
> +{
> +	struct timespec timeout;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = pthread_mutex_lock(&pdata->mutex);
> +	if (ret == EOWNERDEAD)
> +		igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_consistent(&pdata->mutex), 0);
release_ready_processes() asserts on EOWNERDEAD which cancels out the 
robust-mutex fix, If a child dies holding the mutex (exactly the case 
robust mutexes exist for),

the parent aborts instead of recovering, it should be

while (pdata->ready + pdata->failed < n_proc) {
         ret = pthread_cond_timedwait(&pdata->cond, &pdata->mutex, 
&timeout);
         if (ret == EOWNERDEAD) {
igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_consistent(&pdata->mutex), 0);
             continue;

else ......

> +	else
> +		igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> +
> +	clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &timeout);
> +	timeout.tv_sec += 30;
> +	/*
> +	 * Wait until all children have either reached VM Bind rendevouz
> +	 * Or, failed setup and exited the test path.
> +	 */
> +	while (pdata->ready + pdata->failed < n_proc) {
> +		ret = pthread_cond_timedwait(&pdata->cond, &pdata->mutex, &timeout);
> +		if (ret == EOWNERDEAD) {
> +			igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_consistent(&pdata->mutex), 0);
> +		} else if (ret == ETIMEDOUT) {

After ETIMEDOUT, the parent sets pdata->go = true unconditionally, 
Children still stuck in setup (that never reached the rendezvous) get 
released

and proceed into bind_bos() / exec with a partially initialized state. 
On timeout you should mark the run as failed rather than letting 
stragglers run:

pdata->failed = n_proc;   /* stop stragglers proceeding */

> +			igt_warn("Timeout waiting for the child process: ready=%d, failed =%d, expected=%d",
> +			pdata->ready, pdata->failed, n_proc);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> +	}
> +
> +	igt_debug("Process rendezvous: ready=%d failed=%d total = %d\n",
> +		  pdata->ready, pdata->failed, n_proc);
> +
> +	/* Release every successful child into VM_Bind at same time*/
> +	pdata->go = true;
> +	pthread_cond_broadcast(&pdata->cond);
> +	pthread_mutex_unlock(&pdata->mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static int build_add_batch(struct gem_bo *batch_bo, struct gem_bo *integers_bo,
> +			   struct gem_bo *result_bo, int ints_to_add)
> +{
> +	int pos = 0;
> +	int i;
> +	uint64_t tmp_addr;
> +
> +	batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM_CMD | MI_LRI_LRM_CS_MMIO | 2;
> +	batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = GPR_RX_ADDR(0);
> +	tmp_addr = integers_bo->addr + 0 * sizeof(uint32_t);
> +	batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = tmp_addr & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> +	batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = (tmp_addr >> 32) & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> +	for (i = 1; i < ints_to_add; i++) {
> +		/* r1 = integers_bo[i] */
> +		batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM_CMD | MI_LRI_LRM_CS_MMIO | 2;
> +		batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = GPR_RX_ADDR(1);
> +		tmp_addr = integers_bo->addr + i * sizeof(uint32_t);
> +		batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = tmp_addr & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> +		batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = (tmp_addr >> 32) & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> +		/* r0 = r0 + r1 */
> +		batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_MATH(4);
> +		batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_MATH_LOAD(MI_MATH_REG_SRCA, MI_MATH_REG(0));
> +		batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_MATH_LOAD(MI_MATH_REG_SRCB, MI_MATH_REG(1));
> +		batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_MATH_ADD;
> +		batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_MATH_STORE(MI_MATH_REG(0), MI_MATH_REG_ACCU);
> +	}
> +	/* result_bo[0] = r0 */
> +	batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM_GEN8 | MI_LRI_LRM_CS_MMIO;
> +	batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = GPR_RX_ADDR(0);
> +	tmp_addr = result_bo->addr + 0 * sizeof(uint32_t);
> +	batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = tmp_addr & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> +	batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = (tmp_addr >> 32) & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> +
> +	batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> +	while (pos % 4 != 0)
> +		batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_NOOP;
> +	return pos;
> +}
> +
> +static void create_exec_queue(int fd, struct xe_oversubscribe_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	ctx->exec_queue_id = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, ctx->vm_id,
> +						  &xe_engine(fd, 0)->instance, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static uint64_t *
> +vm_bind_bo_batch(int fd, struct xe_oversubscribe_ctx *ctx, struct gem_bo *bos, int size,
> +		 int *out_err)
> +{
> +	uint64_t *ufence;
> +	struct drm_xe_sync bind_sync;
> +	struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op *binds;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	binds = calloc(size, sizeof(*binds));
> +	igt_assert(binds);
> +
> +	ufence = calloc(1, sizeof(*ufence));
> +	igt_assert(ufence);
> +	bind_sync = (struct drm_xe_sync) {
> +		.type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE,
> +		.flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL,
> +		.addr = to_user_pointer(ufence),
> +		.timeline_value = 1,
> +	};
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> +		binds[i] = (struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op) {
> +			.obj = bos[i].handle,
> +			.obj_offset = 0,
> +			.range = bos[i].size,
> +			.addr = bos[i].addr,
> +			.op = DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_MAP,
> +			.flags = 0,
> +		};
> +	}
> +	*out_err = __xe_vm_bind_array(fd, ctx->vm_id, binds, size, &bind_sync, 1);
> +	free(binds);
> +	return ufence;
> +}
> +
> +/* Returns 1 (caller should skip exec) on an allowed OOM error, 0 otherwise. */
> +static int bind_bos(int fd, struct xe_oversubscribe_ctx *ctx, struct gem_bo *bufs,
> +		    struct mem_bind_sync *bind, int *bind_err, bool allow_oom)
> +{
> +	if (!bind->n_bufs)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	bind->binds_ufence = vm_bind_bo_batch(fd, ctx, bufs, bind->n_bufs, bind_err);
> +
> +	if (*bind_err) {
> +		if (allow_oom) {
> +			igt_assert_f(*bind_err == -ENOMEM || *bind_err == -ENOSPC,
> +				     "Unexpected bind error: %d (%s)\n",
> +				     *bind_err, strerror(-*bind_err));
> +			igt_debug("Bind failed with expected OOM (%s), skipping exec\n",
> +				  strerror(-*bind_err));
> +			return 1;
> +		}
> +
> +		igt_assert_f(false, "Unexpected bind error: %d", *bind_err);
> +	}
> +
> +	xe_wait_ufence(fd, bind->binds_ufence, 1, 0, TIMEOUT_NS);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int fill_random_integers(struct gem_bo *int_bo, int ints_to_add)
> +{
> +	uint32_t expected_result = 0;
> +	char expr[256];
> +	int len = 0;
> +
> +	for (int i = 0; i < ints_to_add; i++) {
> +		uint32_t random_int = rand() % 8;
> +
> +		int_bo->ptr[i] = random_int;
> +		expected_result += random_int;
> +
> +		len += snprintf(expr + len, sizeof(expr) - len, "%s%u",
> +				i ? " + " : "", random_int);
> +	}
> +	igt_debug("%s = %u\n", expr, expected_result);
> +	return expected_result;
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup_bo_resources(int fd, struct gem_bo *bo)
> +{
> +	if (bo->ptr) {
> +		igt_assert_eq(munmap(bo->ptr, bo->size), 0);
> +		bo->ptr = NULL;
> +	}
> +	if (bo->handle)
> +		gem_close(fd, bo->handle);
> +}
> +
> +static int create_test_bos(int fd, struct xe_oversubscribe_ctx *ctx,
> +			   struct mem_bind_sync *bind, uint32_t placement,
> +			   uint64_t *addr)
> +{
> +	const char *mem_type = (placement & vram_memory(fd, 0)) ? "VRAM" : "SRAM";
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	for (int i = 0; i < bind->n_bufs; i++) {
> +		struct gem_bo *bo = &bind->bufs[i];
> +
> +		bo->size = GB(1);
> +		ret = __xe_bo_create_caching(fd, ctx->vm_id, bo->size, placement, 0,
> +					     DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WC, &bo->handle);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			int saved_errno = errno; /* capture before anything can clobber it */
> +
> +			bind->n_bufs = i;
> +			if (saved_errno == ENOMEM || saved_errno == ENOSPC) {
> +				/* Continue on OOM, expected when oversubscribing the VM */
> +				igt_debug("%s allocation failed at buffer %d (OOM)\n", mem_type, i);
> +				break;
> +			}
> +			/* We are returning as this is a fail scenario */
> +			igt_warn("%s allocation failed at buffer %d: %s\n",
> +				 mem_type, i, strerror(saved_errno));
> +			return -saved_errno;
> +		}
> +		bo->ptr = NULL;
> +		bo->addr = *addr;
> +		*addr += bo->size;
> +		igt_debug("%s buffer %d created at 0x%016lx\n", mem_type, i, bo->addr);
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup_sram_vram_objs(int fd, struct mem_bind_sync *vram_bind,
> +				   struct mem_bind_sync *sram_bind)
> +{
> +	for (int i = 0; i < vram_bind->n_bufs; i++)
> +		gem_close(fd, vram_bind->bufs[i].handle);
> +	for (int i = 0; i < sram_bind->n_bufs; i++)
> +		gem_close(fd, sram_bind->bufs[i].handle);
> +	free(vram_bind->bufs);
> +	free(sram_bind->bufs);
> +	if (vram_bind->binds_ufence)
> +		free(vram_bind->binds_ufence);
> +	if (sram_bind->binds_ufence)
> +		free(sram_bind->binds_ufence);
> +}
> +
> +static void create_bo(int fd, uint32_t vm, struct gem_bo *bo, uint64_t size,
> +		      uint64_t addr, bool map_now)
> +{
> +	bo->size = ALIGN(size, 4096);
> +	bo->handle = xe_bo_create_caching(fd, vm, bo->size, system_memory(fd), 0,
> +					  DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WC);
> +	igt_assert(bo->handle);
> +	bo->addr = addr;
> +	if (map_now) {
> +		bo->ptr = xe_bo_map(fd, bo->handle, bo->size);
> +		igt_assert(bo->ptr != MAP_FAILED);
> +	} else {
> +		bo->ptr = NULL;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static bool calc_oversubscribe_params(int fd, struct oversubscribe_params *p)
> +{
> +	uint64_t target_vram, target_sram;
> +	uint64_t total_vram_bufs, total_sram_bufs, max_by_mem;
> +
> +	p->vram_size =  xe_visible_available_vram_size(fd, 0);
> +	p->sram_size = (uint64_t)igt_get_avail_ram_mb() << 20;
> +	/*
> +	 * Dynamically cap VRAM oversubscription so the overflow into system
> +	 * RAM stays within 25% of available RAM. On small-VRAM platforms
> +	 * the 2x target fits within the cap and behavior is
> +	 * unchanged; on large-VRAM platforms (e.g. PVC) this prevents OOM.
> +	 */
> +
> +	target_vram = min(p->vram_size * 2, p->vram_size + p->sram_size / 4);
> +	target_sram = min_t(uint64_t, p->sram_size * 50 / 100,
> +			    MAX_SRAM_TEST_SIZE);
> +	total_vram_bufs = target_vram / GB(1);
> +	total_sram_bufs = target_sram / GB(1);
> +	max_by_mem = min(total_vram_bufs / MIN_BUFS_PER_PROC,
> +			 total_sram_bufs / MIN_BUFS_PER_PROC);
> +
> +	p->n_proc = min_t(int, max_by_mem, MAX_PROCS);
> +	if (p->n_proc <= 0)
> +		return false;
> +	p->n_vram_bufs = max_t(int, 2, total_vram_bufs / p->n_proc);
> +	p->n_sram_bufs = max_t(int, 2, total_sram_bufs / p->n_proc);
> +	p->total_vram_demand = (uint64_t)p->n_proc * p->n_vram_bufs * GB(1);
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_vm_oversubscribe_concurrent_bind(int fd)
> +{
> +	struct oversubscribe_params p;
> +	struct process_data *pdata;
> +
> +	igt_require_f(calc_oversubscribe_params(fd, &p),
> +		      "Not enough VRAM/RAM for oversubscription test\n");
> +
> +	igt_debug("VRAM size: %" PRIu64 "MB, System RAM available: %" PRIu64 "MB\n",
> +		  p.vram_size >> 20, p.sram_size >> 20);
> +
> +	igt_debug("n_proc = %d\n", p.n_proc);
> +	igt_debug("VRAM: %" PRIu64 "GB\n", p.vram_size >> 30);
> +	igt_debug("VRAM demand: %" PRIu64 "MB (%.2fx oversubscription)\n",
> +		  p.total_vram_demand >> 20, (double)p.total_vram_demand / p.vram_size);
> +	igt_debug("Processes=%d VRAM_bufs=%d SRAM_bufs=%d\n", p.n_proc,
> +		  p.n_vram_bufs, p.n_sram_bufs);
> +
> +	pdata = mmap(NULL, sizeof(*pdata), PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> +		     MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> +	igt_assert(pdata != MAP_FAILED);
> +	init_pdata(pdata);
> +
> +	igt_fork(child, p.n_proc) {
> +		struct xe_oversubscribe_ctx ctx = {0};
> +		int rc, ret, fd_c;
> +		uint64_t addr = STRESS_BIND_ADDR;
> +		uint32_t expected_result = 0;
> +		struct gem_bo integers_bo = {0}, result_bo = {0}, batch_bo = {0};
> +		struct gem_bo *vram_bufs, *sram_bufs;
> +		int pos = 0;
> +		struct mem_bind_sync vram_bind = {0};
> +		struct mem_bind_sync sram_bind = {0};
> +		struct drm_xe_sync batch_syncs[1];
> +		struct drm_xe_exec exec;
> +		struct gem_bo ufence_bo = {0};
> +		int vram_bind_err = 0, sram_bind_err = 0;
> +
> +		vram_bufs = calloc(p.n_vram_bufs, sizeof(*vram_bufs));
> +		sram_bufs = calloc(p.n_sram_bufs, sizeof(*sram_bufs));
> +		srand(child);
> +
> +		fd_c = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
> +
> +		igt_assert(vram_bufs && sram_bufs);
> +
> +		ctx.vm_id = xe_vm_create(fd_c, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE, 0);

The VM is created with only DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE, but you 
then use xe_vm_bind_lr_sync()

and a DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE out-sync on DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC.

LR/user-fence submission paths typically require 
DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE.

Confirm the exec queue/VM are actually long-running; otherwise the exec 
user-fence may never

signal and xe_wait_ufence will hit TIMEOUT_NS. This is the most likely 
source of an intermittent hang under pressure.
> +		create_exec_queue(fd_c, &ctx);
> +		vram_bind.bufs = vram_bufs;
> +		vram_bind.n_bufs = p.n_vram_bufs;
> +		sram_bind.bufs = sram_bufs;
> +		sram_bind.n_bufs = p.n_sram_bufs;
> +
> +		ret = create_test_bos(fd_c, &ctx, &vram_bind, vram_memory(fd_c, 0), &addr);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			process_setup_failed(pdata);
> +			goto cleanup;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = create_test_bos(fd_c, &ctx, &sram_bind, system_memory(fd_c), &addr);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			process_setup_failed(pdata);
> +			goto cleanup;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!vram_bind.n_bufs || !sram_bind.n_bufs) {
> +			igt_debug("No BOs allocated; VRAM/SRAM unavailable, skipping\n");
> +			process_setup_failed(pdata);
> +			goto cleanup;
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * All allocations are complete. Report Ready and wait until every
> +		 * child has either reached this point or repported a setup failure.
> +		 */
> +
> +		 process_ready_and_wait(pdata);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * VM_Bind starts only after the parent releases all ready
> +		 * childen.
> +		 */
> +
> +		if (bind_bos(fd_c, &ctx, vram_bufs, &vram_bind, &vram_bind_err, true))
> +			goto cleanup;
> +
> +		if (bind_bos(fd_c, &ctx, sram_bufs, &sram_bind, &sram_bind_err, false))
> +			goto cleanup;
> +
> +		create_bo(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, &integers_bo, 4096, EXEC_DATA_ADDR, true);
> +		expected_result = fill_random_integers(&integers_bo, INT_ADD_CNT);
> +		igt_debug("%d\n", expected_result);
> +		create_bo(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, &result_bo, 4096, EXEC_RESULT_ADDR, false);
> +		create_bo(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, &batch_bo, 4096, EXEC_BATCH_ADDR, true);
> +		pos = build_add_batch(&batch_bo, &integers_bo, &result_bo, INT_ADD_CNT);
> +
> +		igt_assert(pos * sizeof(int) <= batch_bo.size);
> +
> +		xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, integers_bo.handle, 0, integers_bo.addr,
> +				   integers_bo.size, 0);
> +		xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, result_bo.handle, 0, result_bo.addr,
> +				   result_bo.size, 0);
> +		xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, batch_bo.handle, 0, batch_bo.addr,
> +				   batch_bo.size, 0);
> +		create_bo(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, &ufence_bo, 4096, EXEC_UFENCE_ADDR, true);
> +
> +		memset(ufence_bo.ptr, 0, ufence_bo.size);
> +		xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, ufence_bo.handle, 0, ufence_bo.addr,
> +				   ufence_bo.size, 0);
> +
> +		batch_syncs[0] = (struct drm_xe_sync){
> +			.type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE,
> +			.flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL,
> +			.addr = ufence_bo.addr,
> +			.timeline_value = USER_FENCE_VALUE,
> +		};
> +
> +		exec = (struct drm_xe_exec) {
> +			.exec_queue_id = ctx.exec_queue_id,
> +			.num_syncs = 1,
> +			.syncs = (uintptr_t)batch_syncs,
> +			.address = batch_bo.addr,
> +			.num_batch_buffer = 1,
> +		};
> +
> +		rc = igt_ioctl(fd_c, DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC, &exec);
> +		igt_assert_f(rc == 0, "xe_exec failed unexpectedly: %s (%d)\n",
> +			     strerror(errno), errno);
> +		xe_wait_ufence(fd_c, (uint64_t *)ufence_bo.ptr, USER_FENCE_VALUE, ctx.exec_queue_id,
> +			       TIMEOUT_NS);
> +		result_bo.ptr = xe_bo_map(fd_c, result_bo.handle, result_bo.size);
> +		igt_assert(result_bo.ptr != MAP_FAILED);
> +		igt_assert_eq(result_bo.ptr[0], expected_result);
> +cleanup:
> +		cleanup_bo_resources(fd_c, &ufence_bo);
> +		cleanup_bo_resources(fd_c, &result_bo);
> +		cleanup_bo_resources(fd_c, &batch_bo);
> +		cleanup_bo_resources(fd_c, &integers_bo);
> +		cleanup_sram_vram_objs(fd_c, &vram_bind, &sram_bind);
> +		xe_exec_queue_destroy(fd_c, ctx.exec_queue_id);
> +		xe_vm_destroy(fd_c, ctx.vm_id);
> +		drm_close_driver(fd_c);
> +	}
> +
> +	release_ready_processes(pdata, p.n_proc);
> +	igt_waitchildren();
> +	igt_reset_timeout();
> +
> +	pthread_cond_destroy(&pdata->cond);
> +	pthread_mutex_destroy(&pdata->mutex);
> +	igt_assert_eq(munmap(pdata, sizeof(*pdata)), 0);
> +}
> +
>   static void alloc_sizes_init(void)
>   {
>   	int i;
> @@ -986,6 +1512,7 @@ static const struct test_case test_matrix[] = {
>   	{ "threads-leak-binding-rand-sizes-50", 50, LEAK_BINDING, TYPE_THREAD, false },
>   	{ "threads-leak-binding-rand-sizes-50-unaligned", 50, LEAK_BINDING | UNALIGNED,
>   	  TYPE_THREAD, false },
> +	{ "test_vm_oversubscribe_concurrent_bind", 0, 0, TYPE_OVERSUBSCRIBE, false},
>   };
>   
>   int igt_main()
> @@ -1011,6 +1538,10 @@ int igt_main()
>   				run_threaded_bo_alloc_test(fd, t->count, t->flags);
>   			}
>   			break;
> +		case TYPE_OVERSUBSCRIBE:
> +			igt_subtest_f("%s", t->name)
> +				test_vm_oversubscribe_concurrent_bind(fd);
> +			break;
>   		case TYPE_ALL_SIZES:
>   		case TYPE_RANDOM_SIZE:
>   		case TYPE_ARRAY_BIND:

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-22 11:04 [PATCH i-g-t v5 0/5] Add BO Allocation and VM Bind stress infra Sobin Thomas
2026-09-22 11:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v5 1/5] tests/intel: add BO allocation stress coverage Sobin Thomas
2026-10-01  4:52   ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-09-22 11:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v5 2/5] tests/intel: Add random-size BO leak tests Sobin Thomas
2026-10-01  6:50   ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-10-05  6:15     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-09-22 11:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v5 3/5] tests/intel: Add array-of-binds random-size allocation tests Sobin Thomas
2026-10-05  6:20   ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-10-08 13:17     ` Thomas, Sobin
2026-09-22 11:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v5 4/5] tests/intel: Add threaded random-size allocation stress tests Sobin Thomas
2026-10-05  6:56   ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-10-08 10:35     ` Thomas, Sobin
2026-09-22 11:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v5 5/5] tests/intel: Add oversubscribe concurrent bind stress subtest Sobin Thomas
2026-09-29  5:17   ` Sharma, Nishit [this message]
2026-10-05 14:34   ` Sharma, Nishit
2026-10-08 10:12     ` Thomas, Sobin
2026-09-23  1:23 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Add BO Allocation and VM Bind stress infra (rev4) Patchwork
2026-09-23  2:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-23 15:56 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-23 18:40 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=663ce7c8-e218-4f6a-bafd-bc2f78febfb9@intel.com \
    --to=nishit.sharma@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com \
    --cc=sobin.thomas@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox