From: "Sharma, Nishit" <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
To: Sobin Thomas <sobin.thomas@intel.com>,
<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>, <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v5 5/5] tests/intel: Add oversubscribe concurrent bind stress subtest
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:47:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <663ce7c8-e218-4f6a-bafd-bc2f78febfb9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922110438.2402109-6-sobin.thomas@intel.com>
On 9/22/2026 4:34 PM, Sobin Thomas wrote:
> Add test for oversubscribing VRAM in multi process environment that
> creates VM, bind large BOs and submit workloads nearly simultaneously.
>
> Previous coverage lacked a scenario combining multi-process bind
> with VRAM oversubscription. This generates memory pressure with
> multi-process VM Bind activity and concurrent submission, exercising
> the bind pipeline under eviction pressure.
>
> v3: Fixed minor nits
> v4: Refactoring of the create_bo ( Nishit)
> Fix child process exit deadlock in release_ready_processes() (Nishit)
>
> Signed-off-by: Sobin Thomas <sobin.thomas@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_bo_alloc.c | 533 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 532 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_bo_alloc.c b/tests/intel/xe_bo_alloc.c
> index d8368087b..2ee468c62 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_bo_alloc.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_bo_alloc.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,17 @@
> #define THREAD_VA_STRIDE GB(1)
> #define SZ_4K_SHIFT 12
> #define MAX_ALLOCATIONS 50000
> +#define INT_ADD_CNT 4
> +#define TIMEOUT_NS (30ULL * 1000000000ULL)
> +#define MAX_SRAM_TEST_SIZE GB(32)
> +#define GPR_RX_ADDR(x) (0x600 + (x) * 8)
> +#define MAX_PROCS 20
> +
> +#define EXEC_DATA_ADDR 0x100000ULL
> +#define EXEC_RESULT_ADDR 0x200000ULL
> +#define EXEC_BATCH_ADDR 0x300000ULL
> +#define EXEC_UFENCE_ADDR 0x400000ULL
> +#define STRESS_BIND_ADDR 0x40000000ULL
>
> /**
> * SUBTEST: all-sizes-once
> @@ -76,14 +87,48 @@
> * Description: Test 50 random BO allocation sizes in test table with a thread per engine,
> * leak the binding, unaligned bind addresses
> * Test category: stress test
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: test_vm_oversubscribe_concurrent_bind
> + * Description: Test enough random BO allocation sizes, bound as arrays of binds, to trigger
> + * evictions with 2 processes per engine, leak the BO munmap / gem close, unaligned bind addresses
> + * Test category: stress test
> */
>
> #define GB(x) (1024ULL * 1024ULL * 1024ULL * (x))
> #define MIN_BUFS_PER_PROC 2
>
> #define N_ALLOC_SIZES 256
> +#define USER_FENCE_VALUE 0xdeadbeefdeadbeefull
> +
> static uint64_t *alloc_sizes;
>
> +struct gem_bo {
> + uint32_t handle;
> + uint64_t size;
> + uint32_t *ptr;
> + uint64_t addr;
> +};
> +
> +struct xe_oversubscribe_ctx {
> + uint32_t vm_id;
> + uint32_t exec_queue_id;
> +};
> +
> +struct mem_bind_sync {
> + struct gem_bo *bufs;
> + int n_bufs;
> + uint64_t *binds_ufence;
> +};
> +
> +struct process_data {
> + pthread_mutex_t mutex;
> + pthread_cond_t cond;
> + int ready;
> + int failed;
> + pthread_barrier_t barrier;
> + bool go;
> +};
> +
> /*
> * Data-driven subtest matrix.
> *
> @@ -103,7 +148,8 @@ enum test_type {
> TYPE_ALL_SIZES,
> TYPE_RANDOM_SIZE,
> TYPE_ARRAY_BIND,
> - TYPE_THREAD
> + TYPE_THREAD,
> + TYPE_OVERSUBSCRIBE,
> };
>
> struct test_case {
> @@ -114,6 +160,14 @@ struct test_case {
> bool requires_evict_ram;
> };
>
> +struct oversubscribe_params {
> + int n_proc;
> + int n_vram_bufs;
> + int n_sram_bufs;
> + uint64_t vram_size;
> + uint64_t sram_size;
> + uint64_t total_vram_demand;
> +};
> #define LEAK_BINDING (0x1 << 0)
> #define LEAK_BO (0x1 << 1)
> #define EVICT (0x1 << 2)
> @@ -244,6 +298,478 @@ static int __xe_vm_bind_array(int fd, uint32_t vm,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void init_pdata(struct process_data *pdata)
> +{
> + pthread_mutexattr_t mattr;
> + pthread_condattr_t cattr;
> +
> + pthread_mutexattr_init(&mattr);
> + igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutexattr_setpshared(&mattr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED), 0);
> + igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutexattr_setrobust(&mattr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST), 0);
> + igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_init(&pdata->mutex, &mattr), 0);
> + pthread_mutexattr_destroy(&mattr);
> +
> + pthread_condattr_init(&cattr);
> + igt_assert_eq(pthread_condattr_setpshared(&cattr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED), 0);
> + igt_assert_eq(pthread_cond_init(&pdata->cond, &cattr), 0);
> + pthread_condattr_destroy(&cattr);
> + pdata->ready = 0;
> + pdata->failed = 0;
> + pdata->go = false;
> +}
> +
> +static void process_ready_and_wait(struct process_data *pdata)
> +{
> + int ret = pthread_mutex_lock(&pdata->mutex);
> +
> + if (ret == EOWNERDEAD)
> + igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_consistent(&pdata->mutex), 0);
> + else
> + igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> + pdata->ready++;
> + pthread_cond_broadcast(&pdata->cond);
> + while (!pdata->go)
> + pthread_cond_wait(&pdata->cond, &pdata->mutex);
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&pdata->mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static void process_setup_failed(struct process_data *pdata)
> +{
> + int ret = pthread_mutex_lock(&pdata->mutex);
> +
> + if (ret == EOWNERDEAD)
> + igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_consistent(&pdata->mutex), 0);
> + else
> + igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> + pdata->failed++;
> + pthread_cond_broadcast(&pdata->cond);
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&pdata->mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static void release_ready_processes(struct process_data *pdata, int n_proc)
> +{
> + struct timespec timeout;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pthread_mutex_lock(&pdata->mutex);
> + if (ret == EOWNERDEAD)
> + igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_consistent(&pdata->mutex), 0);
release_ready_processes() asserts on EOWNERDEAD which cancels out the
robust-mutex fix, If a child dies holding the mutex (exactly the case
robust mutexes exist for),
the parent aborts instead of recovering, it should be
while (pdata->ready + pdata->failed < n_proc) {
ret = pthread_cond_timedwait(&pdata->cond, &pdata->mutex,
&timeout);
if (ret == EOWNERDEAD) {
igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_consistent(&pdata->mutex), 0);
continue;
else ......
> + else
> + igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> +
> + clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &timeout);
> + timeout.tv_sec += 30;
> + /*
> + * Wait until all children have either reached VM Bind rendevouz
> + * Or, failed setup and exited the test path.
> + */
> + while (pdata->ready + pdata->failed < n_proc) {
> + ret = pthread_cond_timedwait(&pdata->cond, &pdata->mutex, &timeout);
> + if (ret == EOWNERDEAD) {
> + igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_consistent(&pdata->mutex), 0);
> + } else if (ret == ETIMEDOUT) {
After ETIMEDOUT, the parent sets pdata->go = true unconditionally,
Children still stuck in setup (that never reached the rendezvous) get
released
and proceed into bind_bos() / exec with a partially initialized state.
On timeout you should mark the run as failed rather than letting
stragglers run:
pdata->failed = n_proc; /* stop stragglers proceeding */
> + igt_warn("Timeout waiting for the child process: ready=%d, failed =%d, expected=%d",
> + pdata->ready, pdata->failed, n_proc);
> + break;
> + }
> + igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> + }
> +
> + igt_debug("Process rendezvous: ready=%d failed=%d total = %d\n",
> + pdata->ready, pdata->failed, n_proc);
> +
> + /* Release every successful child into VM_Bind at same time*/
> + pdata->go = true;
> + pthread_cond_broadcast(&pdata->cond);
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&pdata->mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static int build_add_batch(struct gem_bo *batch_bo, struct gem_bo *integers_bo,
> + struct gem_bo *result_bo, int ints_to_add)
> +{
> + int pos = 0;
> + int i;
> + uint64_t tmp_addr;
> +
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM_CMD | MI_LRI_LRM_CS_MMIO | 2;
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = GPR_RX_ADDR(0);
> + tmp_addr = integers_bo->addr + 0 * sizeof(uint32_t);
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = tmp_addr & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = (tmp_addr >> 32) & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> + for (i = 1; i < ints_to_add; i++) {
> + /* r1 = integers_bo[i] */
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM_CMD | MI_LRI_LRM_CS_MMIO | 2;
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = GPR_RX_ADDR(1);
> + tmp_addr = integers_bo->addr + i * sizeof(uint32_t);
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = tmp_addr & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = (tmp_addr >> 32) & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> + /* r0 = r0 + r1 */
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_MATH(4);
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_MATH_LOAD(MI_MATH_REG_SRCA, MI_MATH_REG(0));
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_MATH_LOAD(MI_MATH_REG_SRCB, MI_MATH_REG(1));
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_MATH_ADD;
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_MATH_STORE(MI_MATH_REG(0), MI_MATH_REG_ACCU);
> + }
> + /* result_bo[0] = r0 */
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM_GEN8 | MI_LRI_LRM_CS_MMIO;
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = GPR_RX_ADDR(0);
> + tmp_addr = result_bo->addr + 0 * sizeof(uint32_t);
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = tmp_addr & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = (tmp_addr >> 32) & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> +
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> + while (pos % 4 != 0)
> + batch_bo->ptr[pos++] = MI_NOOP;
> + return pos;
> +}
> +
> +static void create_exec_queue(int fd, struct xe_oversubscribe_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + ctx->exec_queue_id = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, ctx->vm_id,
> + &xe_engine(fd, 0)->instance, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static uint64_t *
> +vm_bind_bo_batch(int fd, struct xe_oversubscribe_ctx *ctx, struct gem_bo *bos, int size,
> + int *out_err)
> +{
> + uint64_t *ufence;
> + struct drm_xe_sync bind_sync;
> + struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op *binds;
> + int i;
> +
> + binds = calloc(size, sizeof(*binds));
> + igt_assert(binds);
> +
> + ufence = calloc(1, sizeof(*ufence));
> + igt_assert(ufence);
> + bind_sync = (struct drm_xe_sync) {
> + .type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE,
> + .flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL,
> + .addr = to_user_pointer(ufence),
> + .timeline_value = 1,
> + };
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> + binds[i] = (struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op) {
> + .obj = bos[i].handle,
> + .obj_offset = 0,
> + .range = bos[i].size,
> + .addr = bos[i].addr,
> + .op = DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_MAP,
> + .flags = 0,
> + };
> + }
> + *out_err = __xe_vm_bind_array(fd, ctx->vm_id, binds, size, &bind_sync, 1);
> + free(binds);
> + return ufence;
> +}
> +
> +/* Returns 1 (caller should skip exec) on an allowed OOM error, 0 otherwise. */
> +static int bind_bos(int fd, struct xe_oversubscribe_ctx *ctx, struct gem_bo *bufs,
> + struct mem_bind_sync *bind, int *bind_err, bool allow_oom)
> +{
> + if (!bind->n_bufs)
> + return 0;
> +
> + bind->binds_ufence = vm_bind_bo_batch(fd, ctx, bufs, bind->n_bufs, bind_err);
> +
> + if (*bind_err) {
> + if (allow_oom) {
> + igt_assert_f(*bind_err == -ENOMEM || *bind_err == -ENOSPC,
> + "Unexpected bind error: %d (%s)\n",
> + *bind_err, strerror(-*bind_err));
> + igt_debug("Bind failed with expected OOM (%s), skipping exec\n",
> + strerror(-*bind_err));
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + igt_assert_f(false, "Unexpected bind error: %d", *bind_err);
> + }
> +
> + xe_wait_ufence(fd, bind->binds_ufence, 1, 0, TIMEOUT_NS);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int fill_random_integers(struct gem_bo *int_bo, int ints_to_add)
> +{
> + uint32_t expected_result = 0;
> + char expr[256];
> + int len = 0;
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < ints_to_add; i++) {
> + uint32_t random_int = rand() % 8;
> +
> + int_bo->ptr[i] = random_int;
> + expected_result += random_int;
> +
> + len += snprintf(expr + len, sizeof(expr) - len, "%s%u",
> + i ? " + " : "", random_int);
> + }
> + igt_debug("%s = %u\n", expr, expected_result);
> + return expected_result;
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup_bo_resources(int fd, struct gem_bo *bo)
> +{
> + if (bo->ptr) {
> + igt_assert_eq(munmap(bo->ptr, bo->size), 0);
> + bo->ptr = NULL;
> + }
> + if (bo->handle)
> + gem_close(fd, bo->handle);
> +}
> +
> +static int create_test_bos(int fd, struct xe_oversubscribe_ctx *ctx,
> + struct mem_bind_sync *bind, uint32_t placement,
> + uint64_t *addr)
> +{
> + const char *mem_type = (placement & vram_memory(fd, 0)) ? "VRAM" : "SRAM";
> + int ret;
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < bind->n_bufs; i++) {
> + struct gem_bo *bo = &bind->bufs[i];
> +
> + bo->size = GB(1);
> + ret = __xe_bo_create_caching(fd, ctx->vm_id, bo->size, placement, 0,
> + DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WC, &bo->handle);
> + if (ret) {
> + int saved_errno = errno; /* capture before anything can clobber it */
> +
> + bind->n_bufs = i;
> + if (saved_errno == ENOMEM || saved_errno == ENOSPC) {
> + /* Continue on OOM, expected when oversubscribing the VM */
> + igt_debug("%s allocation failed at buffer %d (OOM)\n", mem_type, i);
> + break;
> + }
> + /* We are returning as this is a fail scenario */
> + igt_warn("%s allocation failed at buffer %d: %s\n",
> + mem_type, i, strerror(saved_errno));
> + return -saved_errno;
> + }
> + bo->ptr = NULL;
> + bo->addr = *addr;
> + *addr += bo->size;
> + igt_debug("%s buffer %d created at 0x%016lx\n", mem_type, i, bo->addr);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup_sram_vram_objs(int fd, struct mem_bind_sync *vram_bind,
> + struct mem_bind_sync *sram_bind)
> +{
> + for (int i = 0; i < vram_bind->n_bufs; i++)
> + gem_close(fd, vram_bind->bufs[i].handle);
> + for (int i = 0; i < sram_bind->n_bufs; i++)
> + gem_close(fd, sram_bind->bufs[i].handle);
> + free(vram_bind->bufs);
> + free(sram_bind->bufs);
> + if (vram_bind->binds_ufence)
> + free(vram_bind->binds_ufence);
> + if (sram_bind->binds_ufence)
> + free(sram_bind->binds_ufence);
> +}
> +
> +static void create_bo(int fd, uint32_t vm, struct gem_bo *bo, uint64_t size,
> + uint64_t addr, bool map_now)
> +{
> + bo->size = ALIGN(size, 4096);
> + bo->handle = xe_bo_create_caching(fd, vm, bo->size, system_memory(fd), 0,
> + DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WC);
> + igt_assert(bo->handle);
> + bo->addr = addr;
> + if (map_now) {
> + bo->ptr = xe_bo_map(fd, bo->handle, bo->size);
> + igt_assert(bo->ptr != MAP_FAILED);
> + } else {
> + bo->ptr = NULL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static bool calc_oversubscribe_params(int fd, struct oversubscribe_params *p)
> +{
> + uint64_t target_vram, target_sram;
> + uint64_t total_vram_bufs, total_sram_bufs, max_by_mem;
> +
> + p->vram_size = xe_visible_available_vram_size(fd, 0);
> + p->sram_size = (uint64_t)igt_get_avail_ram_mb() << 20;
> + /*
> + * Dynamically cap VRAM oversubscription so the overflow into system
> + * RAM stays within 25% of available RAM. On small-VRAM platforms
> + * the 2x target fits within the cap and behavior is
> + * unchanged; on large-VRAM platforms (e.g. PVC) this prevents OOM.
> + */
> +
> + target_vram = min(p->vram_size * 2, p->vram_size + p->sram_size / 4);
> + target_sram = min_t(uint64_t, p->sram_size * 50 / 100,
> + MAX_SRAM_TEST_SIZE);
> + total_vram_bufs = target_vram / GB(1);
> + total_sram_bufs = target_sram / GB(1);
> + max_by_mem = min(total_vram_bufs / MIN_BUFS_PER_PROC,
> + total_sram_bufs / MIN_BUFS_PER_PROC);
> +
> + p->n_proc = min_t(int, max_by_mem, MAX_PROCS);
> + if (p->n_proc <= 0)
> + return false;
> + p->n_vram_bufs = max_t(int, 2, total_vram_bufs / p->n_proc);
> + p->n_sram_bufs = max_t(int, 2, total_sram_bufs / p->n_proc);
> + p->total_vram_demand = (uint64_t)p->n_proc * p->n_vram_bufs * GB(1);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_vm_oversubscribe_concurrent_bind(int fd)
> +{
> + struct oversubscribe_params p;
> + struct process_data *pdata;
> +
> + igt_require_f(calc_oversubscribe_params(fd, &p),
> + "Not enough VRAM/RAM for oversubscription test\n");
> +
> + igt_debug("VRAM size: %" PRIu64 "MB, System RAM available: %" PRIu64 "MB\n",
> + p.vram_size >> 20, p.sram_size >> 20);
> +
> + igt_debug("n_proc = %d\n", p.n_proc);
> + igt_debug("VRAM: %" PRIu64 "GB\n", p.vram_size >> 30);
> + igt_debug("VRAM demand: %" PRIu64 "MB (%.2fx oversubscription)\n",
> + p.total_vram_demand >> 20, (double)p.total_vram_demand / p.vram_size);
> + igt_debug("Processes=%d VRAM_bufs=%d SRAM_bufs=%d\n", p.n_proc,
> + p.n_vram_bufs, p.n_sram_bufs);
> +
> + pdata = mmap(NULL, sizeof(*pdata), PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> + MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> + igt_assert(pdata != MAP_FAILED);
> + init_pdata(pdata);
> +
> + igt_fork(child, p.n_proc) {
> + struct xe_oversubscribe_ctx ctx = {0};
> + int rc, ret, fd_c;
> + uint64_t addr = STRESS_BIND_ADDR;
> + uint32_t expected_result = 0;
> + struct gem_bo integers_bo = {0}, result_bo = {0}, batch_bo = {0};
> + struct gem_bo *vram_bufs, *sram_bufs;
> + int pos = 0;
> + struct mem_bind_sync vram_bind = {0};
> + struct mem_bind_sync sram_bind = {0};
> + struct drm_xe_sync batch_syncs[1];
> + struct drm_xe_exec exec;
> + struct gem_bo ufence_bo = {0};
> + int vram_bind_err = 0, sram_bind_err = 0;
> +
> + vram_bufs = calloc(p.n_vram_bufs, sizeof(*vram_bufs));
> + sram_bufs = calloc(p.n_sram_bufs, sizeof(*sram_bufs));
> + srand(child);
> +
> + fd_c = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
> +
> + igt_assert(vram_bufs && sram_bufs);
> +
> + ctx.vm_id = xe_vm_create(fd_c, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE, 0);
The VM is created with only DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE, but you
then use xe_vm_bind_lr_sync()
and a DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE out-sync on DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC.
LR/user-fence submission paths typically require
DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE.
Confirm the exec queue/VM are actually long-running; otherwise the exec
user-fence may never
signal and xe_wait_ufence will hit TIMEOUT_NS. This is the most likely
source of an intermittent hang under pressure.
> + create_exec_queue(fd_c, &ctx);
> + vram_bind.bufs = vram_bufs;
> + vram_bind.n_bufs = p.n_vram_bufs;
> + sram_bind.bufs = sram_bufs;
> + sram_bind.n_bufs = p.n_sram_bufs;
> +
> + ret = create_test_bos(fd_c, &ctx, &vram_bind, vram_memory(fd_c, 0), &addr);
> + if (ret) {
> + process_setup_failed(pdata);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> + ret = create_test_bos(fd_c, &ctx, &sram_bind, system_memory(fd_c), &addr);
> + if (ret) {
> + process_setup_failed(pdata);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> + if (!vram_bind.n_bufs || !sram_bind.n_bufs) {
> + igt_debug("No BOs allocated; VRAM/SRAM unavailable, skipping\n");
> + process_setup_failed(pdata);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * All allocations are complete. Report Ready and wait until every
> + * child has either reached this point or repported a setup failure.
> + */
> +
> + process_ready_and_wait(pdata);
> +
> + /*
> + * VM_Bind starts only after the parent releases all ready
> + * childen.
> + */
> +
> + if (bind_bos(fd_c, &ctx, vram_bufs, &vram_bind, &vram_bind_err, true))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + if (bind_bos(fd_c, &ctx, sram_bufs, &sram_bind, &sram_bind_err, false))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + create_bo(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, &integers_bo, 4096, EXEC_DATA_ADDR, true);
> + expected_result = fill_random_integers(&integers_bo, INT_ADD_CNT);
> + igt_debug("%d\n", expected_result);
> + create_bo(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, &result_bo, 4096, EXEC_RESULT_ADDR, false);
> + create_bo(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, &batch_bo, 4096, EXEC_BATCH_ADDR, true);
> + pos = build_add_batch(&batch_bo, &integers_bo, &result_bo, INT_ADD_CNT);
> +
> + igt_assert(pos * sizeof(int) <= batch_bo.size);
> +
> + xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, integers_bo.handle, 0, integers_bo.addr,
> + integers_bo.size, 0);
> + xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, result_bo.handle, 0, result_bo.addr,
> + result_bo.size, 0);
> + xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, batch_bo.handle, 0, batch_bo.addr,
> + batch_bo.size, 0);
> + create_bo(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, &ufence_bo, 4096, EXEC_UFENCE_ADDR, true);
> +
> + memset(ufence_bo.ptr, 0, ufence_bo.size);
> + xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd_c, ctx.vm_id, ufence_bo.handle, 0, ufence_bo.addr,
> + ufence_bo.size, 0);
> +
> + batch_syncs[0] = (struct drm_xe_sync){
> + .type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE,
> + .flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL,
> + .addr = ufence_bo.addr,
> + .timeline_value = USER_FENCE_VALUE,
> + };
> +
> + exec = (struct drm_xe_exec) {
> + .exec_queue_id = ctx.exec_queue_id,
> + .num_syncs = 1,
> + .syncs = (uintptr_t)batch_syncs,
> + .address = batch_bo.addr,
> + .num_batch_buffer = 1,
> + };
> +
> + rc = igt_ioctl(fd_c, DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC, &exec);
> + igt_assert_f(rc == 0, "xe_exec failed unexpectedly: %s (%d)\n",
> + strerror(errno), errno);
> + xe_wait_ufence(fd_c, (uint64_t *)ufence_bo.ptr, USER_FENCE_VALUE, ctx.exec_queue_id,
> + TIMEOUT_NS);
> + result_bo.ptr = xe_bo_map(fd_c, result_bo.handle, result_bo.size);
> + igt_assert(result_bo.ptr != MAP_FAILED);
> + igt_assert_eq(result_bo.ptr[0], expected_result);
> +cleanup:
> + cleanup_bo_resources(fd_c, &ufence_bo);
> + cleanup_bo_resources(fd_c, &result_bo);
> + cleanup_bo_resources(fd_c, &batch_bo);
> + cleanup_bo_resources(fd_c, &integers_bo);
> + cleanup_sram_vram_objs(fd_c, &vram_bind, &sram_bind);
> + xe_exec_queue_destroy(fd_c, ctx.exec_queue_id);
> + xe_vm_destroy(fd_c, ctx.vm_id);
> + drm_close_driver(fd_c);
> + }
> +
> + release_ready_processes(pdata, p.n_proc);
> + igt_waitchildren();
> + igt_reset_timeout();
> +
> + pthread_cond_destroy(&pdata->cond);
> + pthread_mutex_destroy(&pdata->mutex);
> + igt_assert_eq(munmap(pdata, sizeof(*pdata)), 0);
> +}
> +
> static void alloc_sizes_init(void)
> {
> int i;
> @@ -986,6 +1512,7 @@ static const struct test_case test_matrix[] = {
> { "threads-leak-binding-rand-sizes-50", 50, LEAK_BINDING, TYPE_THREAD, false },
> { "threads-leak-binding-rand-sizes-50-unaligned", 50, LEAK_BINDING | UNALIGNED,
> TYPE_THREAD, false },
> + { "test_vm_oversubscribe_concurrent_bind", 0, 0, TYPE_OVERSUBSCRIBE, false},
> };
>
> int igt_main()
> @@ -1011,6 +1538,10 @@ int igt_main()
> run_threaded_bo_alloc_test(fd, t->count, t->flags);
> }
> break;
> + case TYPE_OVERSUBSCRIBE:
> + igt_subtest_f("%s", t->name)
> + test_vm_oversubscribe_concurrent_bind(fd);
> + break;
> case TYPE_ALL_SIZES:
> case TYPE_RANDOM_SIZE:
> case TYPE_ARRAY_BIND:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 11:04 [PATCH i-g-t v5 0/5] Add BO Allocation and VM Bind stress infra Sobin Thomas
2026-09-22 11:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v5 1/5] tests/intel: add BO allocation stress coverage Sobin Thomas
2026-10-01 4:52 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-09-22 11:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v5 2/5] tests/intel: Add random-size BO leak tests Sobin Thomas
2026-10-01 6:50 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-10-05 6:15 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-09-22 11:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v5 3/5] tests/intel: Add array-of-binds random-size allocation tests Sobin Thomas
2026-10-05 6:20 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-10-08 13:17 ` Thomas, Sobin
2026-09-22 11:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v5 4/5] tests/intel: Add threaded random-size allocation stress tests Sobin Thomas
2026-10-05 6:56 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-10-08 10:35 ` Thomas, Sobin
2026-09-22 11:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v5 5/5] tests/intel: Add oversubscribe concurrent bind stress subtest Sobin Thomas
2026-09-29 5:17 ` Sharma, Nishit [this message]
2026-10-05 14:34 ` Sharma, Nishit
2026-10-08 10:12 ` Thomas, Sobin
2026-09-23 1:23 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Add BO Allocation and VM Bind stress infra (rev4) Patchwork
2026-09-23 2:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-23 15:56 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-23 18:40 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=663ce7c8-e218-4f6a-bafd-bc2f78febfb9@intel.com \
--to=nishit.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com \
--cc=sobin.thomas@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox