From: "Shankar, Uma" <uma.shankar@intel.com>
To: "Sharma, Swati2" <swati2.sharma@intel.com>,
"igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_cdclk: Minor fix
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 05:04:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68956fef62aa4191a9ae077da11a6820@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210706212749.27996-1-swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sharma, Swati2 <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 2:58 AM
> To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Sharma, Swati2 <swati2.sharma@intel.com>; Shankar, Uma
> <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> Subject: [igt-dev][PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_cdclk: Minor fix
>
> Driver still works in a such way that we never reduce CDCLK, but always only
> increase it. That was done in order to avoid continuous CDCLK switching,
>
> So, in case if new CDCLK is 307200 and there is no change in CDCLK beacuse of
> above stated driver optimization; pass the test else check lt condition.
As discussed on offline chats, enhance this test to lower modes for all connectors in order
to lower cd clock and get a proper DVFS behavior, along with the above mentioned kernel change.
But for now, this change helps avoid getting false failure reports, so:
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shakar@intel.com>
>
> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_cdclk.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_cdclk.c b/tests/kms_cdclk.c index d2a9fa5f..818cbfd5 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_cdclk.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_cdclk.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test cdclk features : crawling");
> #define HDISPLAY_4K 3840
> #define VDISPLAY_4K 2160
> #define VREFRESH 60
> +#define MAX_CDCLK_4K 307200
>
> /* Test flags */
> enum {
> @@ -228,7 +229,8 @@ static void test_mode_transition(data_t *data, enum pipe
> pipe, igt_output_t *out
> igt_info("CD clock frequency %d -> %d\n", cdclk_ref, cdclk_new);
>
> /* cdclk should bump */
> - igt_assert_lt(cdclk_ref, cdclk_new);
> + if (cdclk_new != MAX_CDCLK_4K)
> + igt_assert_lt(cdclk_ref, cdclk_new);
>
> /* cleanup */
> do_cleanup_display(display);
> --
> 2.25.1
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-07 5:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-06 21:27 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_cdclk: Minor fix Swati Sharma
2021-07-06 21:45 ` [igt-dev] ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for " Patchwork
2021-07-06 22:06 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-07 5:04 ` Shankar, Uma [this message]
2021-07-07 5:08 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Shankar, Uma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68956fef62aa4191a9ae077da11a6820@intel.com \
--to=uma.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox