From: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>
To: "Ser, Simon" <simon.ser@intel.com>,
"lyude@redhat.com" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Deak, Imre" <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Subject: [igt-dev] Improving DRM connector hotplug uevents
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 09:42:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c87fea83175c1790a32c55d128d751eb43185a6.camel@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <419d16c1869b4f63e79fa9cf0f14dd32aa0db502.camel@intel.com>
Hi,
So this thread has drifted off from IGT to a general DRM improvement,
so renaming the thread and adding some CCs.
It's about avoiding full reprobes (which may include slow EDID reads,
etc) when a connector change was detected, by providing information
about the connector and the new state to userspace. This way, userspace
can reprobe the changed connector alone (or not reprobe at all in case
of a disconnect).
It feels like there is growing temptation to have per-driver hacks to
avoid full reprobes when the driver knows that nothing changed, but I
think it makes more sense to fixup the uevent we send to make sure that
userspace knows what to probe exactly.
On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 06:55 +0000, Ser, Simon wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 11:56 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > I'm in support of this as well, we really could use better hotplug events.
> > Feel free to cc patches to me for review :)
>
> Any idea(s) how the API would look like?
From a quick chat on IRC yesterday, it seems that just adding entries
to the uevent would do and would be backwards-compatible (well,
provided that the userspace uevent parsers will not fail if something
extra to "HOTPLUG=1" is provided).
Currently, the notification is sent globally at each round of detected
connector change (which may concern multiple connectors). So I think we
should just list the connectors that changed in the uevent and their
new state. So my proposal here is something like:
HOTPLUG=1
CONNECTOR_ID=47
STATUS=Connected
CONNECTOR_ID=48
STATUS=Disconnected
Where each STATUS entry would refer to the previous CONNECTOR_ID entry.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Paul
> > On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 14:24 +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 15:08 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:24 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > > > > After scheduling an HPD toggle event, make sure that we wait for the
> > > > > > hotplug event for each connector that may be sent by the driver.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Depending on the scheduling there could be 1 event or as many events
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > connectors we scheduled an HPD toggle event on, depending on the
> > > > > > timing.
> > > > > > So if we don't yet see the expected connector state on a given
> > > > > > connector
> > > > > > try to wait for an additional hotplug event and reprobe/recheck the
> > > > > > state.
> > > > >
> > > > > This changes makes good sense to me, so:
> > > > >
> > > > > Reviewed-By: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > And it brings back hard feelings about the hotplug interface we have
> > > > > today...
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I was surprised too not find any way to identify which connector(s)
> > > > the hotplug event is associated with. We discussed with Ville if it'd
> > > > make sense to add a connector ID map to the uevent, but not sure if it'd
> > > > be useful outside of this test, or how that would align with Chris'
> > > > connector probe state generation idea.
> > >
> > > Either way, I'm definitely in favor of having something more reliable
> > > to expose to userspace. Having something to correlate each event to one
> > > (or more) connector(s) sounds good to me.
> > >
> > > And I think there is a general need for this, it's not just IGT.
> > >
> > > Currently, every userspace application using DRM has to do a full
> > > reprobe once a hotplug uevent is received, which is really not optimal.
> > > If an entry identifying the connector was also provided, userspace
> > > could only reprobe that connector. The step after that would be having
> > > the indication of whether the connector was connected or disconnected
> > > directly in uevent too, so that no probing needs to be done at all when
> > > a given connector is disconnected.
> > >
> > > Anyway, if you're interested in the idea and that Ville and Chris are
> > > in favor, I really think it would be worth fixing that. And we'd only
> > > be adding new elements to uevent, so that would stay backward-
> > > compatible too.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > > > > > v2:
> > > > > > - s/igt_assert(x >= y)/igt_assert_lte(y, x)/ to see the actual limits
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > the debugging output. (Lyude)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110534
> > > > > > Cc: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > tests/kms_chamelium.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/tests/kms_chamelium.c b/tests/kms_chamelium.c
> > > > > > index 714e5e06..502f1efa 100644
> > > > > > --- a/tests/kms_chamelium.c
> > > > > > +++ b/tests/kms_chamelium.c
> > > > > > @@ -284,11 +284,32 @@ test_edid_read(data_t *data, struct
> > > > > > chamelium_port *port,
> > > > > > drmModeFreeConnector(connector);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +/* Wait for hotplug and return the remaining time left from timeout
> > > > > > */
> > > > > > +static bool wait_for_hotplug(struct udev_monitor *mon, int *timeout)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct timespec start, end;
> > > > > > + int elapsed;
> > > > > > + bool detected;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + igt_assert_eq(igt_gettime(&start), 0);
> > > > > > + detected = igt_hotplug_detected(mon, *timeout);
> > > > > > + igt_assert_eq(igt_gettime(&end), 0);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + elapsed = igt_time_elapsed(&start, &end);
> > > > > > + igt_assert_lte(0, elapsed);
> > > > > > + *timeout = max(0, *timeout - elapsed);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return detected;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > static void
> > > > > > try_suspend_resume_hpd(data_t *data, struct chamelium_port *port,
> > > > > > enum igt_suspend_state state, enum
> > > > > > igt_suspend_test test,
> > > > > > struct udev_monitor *mon, bool connected)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > + drmModeConnection target_state = connected ?
> > > > > > DRM_MODE_DISCONNECTED :
> > > > > > + DRM_MODE_CONNECTE
> > > > > > D;
> > > > > > + int timeout = HOTPLUG_TIMEOUT;
> > > > > > int delay;
> > > > > > int p;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -310,17 +331,29 @@ try_suspend_resume_hpd(data_t *data, struct
> > > > > > chamelium_port *port,
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > igt_system_suspend_autoresume(state, test);
> > > > > > + igt_assert(wait_for_hotplug(mon, &timeout));
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - igt_assert(igt_hotplug_detected(mon, HOTPLUG_TIMEOUT));
> > > > > > if (port) {
> > > > > > - igt_assert_eq(reprobe_connector(data, port), connected
> > > > > > ?
> > > > > > - DRM_MODE_DISCONNECTED :
> > > > > > DRM_MODE_CONNECTED);
> > > > > > + igt_assert_eq(reprobe_connector(data, port),
> > > > > > target_state);
> > > > > > } else {
> > > > > > for (p = 0; p < data->port_count; p++) {
> > > > > > + drmModeConnection current_state;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > port = data->ports[p];
> > > > > > - igt_assert_eq(reprobe_connector(data, port),
> > > > > > connected ?
> > > > > > - DRM_MODE_DISCONNECTED :
> > > > > > - DRM_MODE_CONNECTED);
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * There could be as many hotplug events sent
> > > > > > by
> > > > > > + * driver as connectors we scheduled an HPD
> > > > > > toggle on
> > > > > > + * above, depending on timing. So if we're not
> > > > > > seeing
> > > > > > + * the expected connector state try to wait
> > > > > > for an HPD
> > > > > > + * event for each connector/port.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + current_state = reprobe_connector(data, port);
> > > > > > + if (p > 0 && current_state != target_state) {
> > > > > > + igt_assert(wait_for_hotplug(mon,
> > > > > > &timeout));
> > > > > > + current_state =
> > > > > > reprobe_connector(data, port);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + igt_assert_eq(current_state, target_state);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > port = NULL;
> > > > > --
> > > > > Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
> > > > > Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
> > > > > https://bootlin.com
> > > > >
--
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-10 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-06 17:51 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_chamelium: Make sure we wait for each connectors' hotplug event Imre Deak
2019-05-06 18:38 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2019-05-06 19:40 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-05-07 18:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Lyude Paul
2019-05-08 8:24 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2] " Imre Deak
2019-05-09 7:25 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2019-05-09 12:08 ` Imre Deak
2019-05-09 12:24 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2019-05-09 15:56 ` Lyude Paul
2019-05-10 6:55 ` Ser, Simon
2019-05-10 7:42 ` Paul Kocialkowski [this message]
2019-05-10 7:56 ` [igt-dev] Improving DRM connector hotplug uevents Daniel Vetter
2019-05-10 8:00 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2019-05-10 8:06 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-10 14:28 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2019-05-10 14:39 ` Ser, Simon
2019-05-08 10:06 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_chamelium: Make sure we wait for each connectors' hotplug event (rev2) Patchwork
2019-05-08 11:06 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-05-09 13:59 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c87fea83175c1790a32c55d128d751eb43185a6.camel@bootlin.com \
--to=paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=simon.ser@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox