From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, Praveen <praveen.paneri@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 17:06:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6cc3d4a6-cb7b-e431-7563-c560b9ceb81b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180309134659.9594-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 09/03/2018 13:46, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Exercise some new API that allows applications to request that
> individual contexts are executed within a desired frequency range.
>
> v2: Split single/continuous set_freq subtests
> v3: Do an up/down ramp for individual freq request, check nothing
> changes after each invalid request
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Paneri, Praveen <praveen.paneri@intel.com>
> Cc: Kamble, Sagar A <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
> Cc: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/Makefile.am | 1 +
> tests/Makefile.sources | 1 +
> tests/gem_ctx_freq.c | 648 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/meson.build | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 651 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/gem_ctx_freq.c
>
[snip]
> +static void check_invalid(int fd, uint32_t ctx, uint32_t min, uint32_t max)
> +{
> + const struct test {
> + uint32_t min, max;
> + } tests[] = {
> + { min - 50, max - 50 },
> + { min - 50, max },
> + { min - 50, max + 50 },
> + { min, max + 50 },
> + { min + 50, max + 50 },
> +
> + { min - 50, min - 50 },
> +
> + { min - 50, min },
> + { min + 50, min },
> + { min, min - 50 },
> +
> + { max + 50, max },
> + { max, max + 50 },
> + { max, max - 50 },
> +
> + { max + 50, max + 50 },
Is unprivileged "{ max, max }" allowed? In other words pin to max
frequency by anyone? If so, what happens when all userspace learns about
this and wants to use it just so to be lower latency than the other guy?
Or even on our integrated graphics, such userspace would unwisely take
away power budget from the CPU. Or could it even harm itself by
triggering too much thermal throttling and run slower than if it let the
balance be controlled by the system?
Or will this be tied with the cgroup work to allow only clients allowed
by sysadmin to do this?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-09 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-08 17:13 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx Chris Wilson
2018-03-08 17:33 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx (rev3) Patchwork
2018-03-08 22:29 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-03-09 0:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx Antonio Argenziano
2018-03-09 1:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-03-09 19:15 ` [igt-dev] " Antonio Argenziano
2018-03-09 20:37 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-09 13:46 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-09 17:06 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2018-03-09 17:24 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-03-09 15:57 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx (rev4) Patchwork
2018-03-09 20:27 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-03-13 13:26 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx Chris Wilson
2018-03-13 13:58 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-14 8:15 ` Sagar Arun Kamble
2018-03-14 9:03 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-14 9:49 ` Sagar Arun Kamble
2018-03-13 17:05 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx (rev6) Patchwork
2018-03-13 17:10 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-14 8:37 ` Arkadiusz Hiler
2018-03-14 8:59 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-14 9:12 ` Arkadiusz Hiler
2018-03-14 9:12 ` Patchwork
2018-03-14 9:19 ` Arkadiusz Hiler
2018-03-14 10:07 ` Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-07 22:49 [igt-dev] [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx Chris Wilson
2018-03-08 0:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Antonio Argenziano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6cc3d4a6-cb7b-e431-7563-c560b9ceb81b@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=praveen.paneri@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox