From: Karthik B S <karthik.b.s@intel.com>
To: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic: Sanity check for CRC mismatches
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 16:33:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75dc0eec-7432-0001-d26d-f7916ed8e4df@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200806183400.31856-2-bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
On 8/7/2020 12:03 AM, Bhanuprakash Modem wrote:
> We’ve seen multiple CRC related issues on older platforms and
> pre-silicon environment, most of the time we end up with debugging.
>
> This patch works as a crc-sanity test, which can verify that the
> CRC mechanism is clean from the platform side before debugging the
> actual CRC mismatches or other CRC related issues.
>
> This patch will create two framebuffers (fb0 & fb1) with the same
> color info, flip fb0 with primary plane & collect CRC as reference.
> Then flip fb1 with primary plane, collect the CRC and compare with
> the reference CRC. There should be no CRC mismatch.
>
> v2:
> * Run subtest to all pipes (Karthik & Swati)
> * Fix commit message & few comments (Karthik)
> * Use meaningful name for functions (Swati)
> * Remove unwanted checks (Karthik)
> v3:
> * Rename subtest to compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe- (Petri)
>
> Cc: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> Cc: Karthik B S <karthik.b.s@intel.com>
> Cc: Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>
> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arek@hiler.eu>
> Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c b/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c
> index cb93c1ad..c3c4cdd8 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,75 @@ static void test_read_crc(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, unsigned flags)
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * CRC-sanity test, to make sure there would be no CRC mismatches
> + *
> + * - Create two framebuffers (FB0 & FB1) with same color info
> + * - Flip FB0 with the Primary plane & collect the CRC as ref CRC.
> + * - Flip FB1 with the Primary plane, collect the CRC & compare with
> + * the ref CRC.
> + *
> + * No CRC mismatch should happen
> + */
> +static void test_compare_crc(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe)
> +{
> + igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
> + igt_plane_t *primary;
> + drmModeModeInfo *mode;
> + igt_crc_t ref_crc, crc;
> + igt_pipe_crc_t *pipe_crc = NULL;
> + struct igt_fb fb0, fb1;
> + igt_output_t *output = igt_get_single_output_for_pipe(display, pipe);
> +
> + igt_require_f(output, "No connector found for pipe %s\n",
> + kmstest_pipe_name(pipe));
> +
> + igt_require_pipe(display, pipe);
This check is redundant as you are already calling
'igt_get_single_output_for_pipe' before this.
With this removed, LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Karthik B S <karthik.b.s@intel.com>
> + igt_display_reset(display);
> + igt_output_set_pipe(output, pipe);
> +
> + mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
> +
> + /* Create two framebuffers with the same color info. */
> + igt_create_color_fb(data->drm_fd,
> + mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay,
> + DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
> + LOCAL_DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE,
> + 1.0, 1.0, 1.0,
> + &fb0);
> + igt_create_color_fb(data->drm_fd,
> + mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay,
> + DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
> + LOCAL_DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE,
> + 1.0, 1.0, 1.0,
> + &fb1);
> +
> + /* Flip FB0 with the Primary plane & collect the CRC as ref CRC. */
> + primary = igt_output_get_plane_type(output, DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY);
> + igt_plane_set_fb(primary, &fb0);
> + igt_display_commit(display);
> +
> + pipe_crc = igt_pipe_crc_new(data->drm_fd, pipe,
> + INTEL_PIPE_CRC_SOURCE_AUTO);
> + igt_pipe_crc_collect_crc(pipe_crc, &ref_crc);
> +
> + /* Flip FB1 with the Primary plane & compare the CRC with ref CRC. */
> + igt_plane_set_fb(primary, &fb1);
> + igt_display_commit(display);
> +
> + igt_pipe_crc_collect_crc(pipe_crc, &crc);
> + igt_assert_crc_equal(&crc, &ref_crc);
> +
> + /* Clean-up */
> + igt_pipe_crc_free(pipe_crc);
> + igt_plane_set_fb(primary, NULL);
> + igt_output_set_pipe(output, PIPE_NONE);
> + igt_display_commit(display);
> +
> + igt_remove_fb(data->drm_fd, &fb0);
> + igt_remove_fb(data->drm_fd, &fb1);
> +}
> +
> data_t data = {0, };
>
> igt_main
> @@ -209,6 +278,10 @@ igt_main
>
> igt_disallow_hang(data.drm_fd, hang);
> }
> +
> + igt_describe("Basic sanity check for CRC mismatches");
> + igt_subtest_f("compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-%s", kmstest_pipe_name(pipe))
> + test_compare_crc(&data, pipe);
> }
>
> igt_fixture {
>
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-06 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-06 18:33 [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic: Sanity check for CRC mismatches Bhanuprakash Modem
2020-08-06 11:20 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic: Sanity check for CRC mismatches (rev8) Patchwork
2020-08-06 14:00 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-08-06 15:49 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
2020-08-06 18:33 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic: Sanity check for CRC mismatches Bhanuprakash Modem
2020-08-06 10:43 ` Sharma, Swati2
2020-08-06 11:03 ` Karthik B S [this message]
2020-08-06 13:28 ` Petri Latvala
2020-08-06 18:34 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] intel-ci: Add compare CRC sanity test to BAT Bhanuprakash Modem
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-08-06 18:07 [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic: Sanity check for CRC mismatches Bhanuprakash Modem
2020-08-06 18:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Bhanuprakash Modem
2020-08-06 12:44 [igt-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bhanuprakash Modem
2020-08-06 18:04 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Bhanuprakash Modem
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75dc0eec-7432-0001-d26d-f7916ed8e4df@intel.com \
--to=karthik.b.s@intel.com \
--cc=bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=petri.latvala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox